HPB-SB-3-143

T i

vol. 3, p. 143

H. P. Blavatsky Scrapbooks

from Adyar archives of the International Theosophical Society

vol. 3 (1875-1878)

 

SBT, DT

Legend

• HPB note
• HPB highlighted
• HPB underlined
• HPB crossed out
• <Editors note>
• <Archivist note>
• Lost or unclear
• Restored

<<   ☰   >>

eng • рус

< The Ring of Science (continued from page 3-142) >

ately noticed, at page 384, Vol VII No 39 of Pop. Science Monthly. Prof. E. B. Elliott will show that he was right and Prof. H. E. Davis wrong in the number of young Lepidoptera which, when placed end to end, will measure a mile, —the true figures being 0174 X b— Y54² 1 2 = A’ss.

The Anthropological subsection will no doubt give prominence to a discussion upon Measles as a Religious Element among the Andamanese; and an adjournment could hardly be reached without a fight over the old puzzle, whether it is probable that the American stovepipe represents the form of the prayer-cylinder of the Lacustrians. If Professor Buchanan, who has forgotten more about Anthropology than any of them ever knew, should attempt to crowd upon them the complete study of Man in all his relations, he will be coughed down and the floor granted to somebody who has a speech ready upon the reticulated button-hole of the Bergalese rajpoot's coat. And yet they are not happy.

Have we done any injustice to the American and British Association—for they are both alike. Consult the printed volumes of Transactions, in which may be found record of some of the very papers above enumerated, and others about orange-peel oil, fat women, hyena's dens and the blastoderms of birds’ eggs. If these learned children (for what are they else, who play with such toys?) would simply confess their ignorance of spiritual facts, laws and philosophy, we would have nothing to complain of. It is their own affair whether they study this or that science, and prefer to use the few hours they have on earth in discovering the nature of the respiratory organs of the shark or any other, ignoble tomfoolery, to studying the spiritual part of Man and his inter-mundane communications, attractions and perils. But what the whole Spiritualistic press and all intelligent Spiritualists so indignantly denounce, is the fact that scientific men like Davy, Faraday, Tyndall and Huxley pronounce upon these matters without being possessed of any data upon which to form an opinion. Worse, they sometimes have deliberately lied about observed phenomena, to avoid making a favorable report. If any of them feels aggrieved at our language, let him say so, and we will prove its literal accuracy.

“From the Other World”

...

Apotheosis of Mrs. Conant

Under this startling caption our contemporaries of the Banner of Light, publish some of the laudatory notices of the late Mrs. Conant. Good gracious! What next? Is a new religion to be instituted? Must Spiritualists be called upon to worship Mrs. Conant as a divinity? The Pope contents himself with the mere canonization of a devout brother or sister; he or she is made a simple saint; Catholics have not ventured further than this; but the Banner wants an apotheosis! It would have us make of Mrs. Conant a goddess! How would that dear, good lady have recoiled from adulation like this! An apotheosis! Does the Banner really know what it means? Let Noah Webster explain; “Apotheosis (from apo, from, and theos, god.) The act of elevating a mortal to the rank, and placing him among the number, of the gods; deification, consecration.” It is bombast like this that makes Spiritualism the laughing-stock of the cultivated classes. But the Banner’s blunder is of a piece with many of the utterances through Mrs. Conant, claiming to be scientific. What wonder that Spiritualism has been mistrusted and laughed at? Is it not time for a little wholesome competition?

Only One Kind of Matter in the Universe

To the Editor of the Spiritual Scientist:

There are many eminent chemists. Prof. Cooke among the number, who believe, that, instead of there being sixty-four elements, there is but one. That this one universal element assumes more than sixty different forms (according to the velocity with which the atom moves), which constitute the molecules, or their arrangement or number, it not more wonderful than the changes which some of our so-called elemental bodies suffer in their allotropic modifications — Scientific American.

What a sublime simplification of the “elements” of nature the foregoing suggests! bringing us within a step of the universal atom of matter, the macrocosmic atom, save that it is pulseless and inert!

But the atom lives and moves. Whence its life and motion? Whence force? Is it not of God? Is it not “God”?

J.C.R.

Mt. Vernon, N.Y. Aug 16, 1876.

Our Rogues Gallery

...

<... continues on page 3-144 >

Editor's notes

Sources

• 

  Spiritual Scientist, v. 2, No. 25, August 26, 1875, p. 295

• 

  Spiritual Scientist, v. 4, No. 26, August 31, 1876, p. 305