Sergey at 12:52, 26 January 2026

2026-01-26T12:52:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:52, 26 January 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - A Note of Explanation		\| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - A Note of Explanation
	\| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Chinese Shadows		\| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Chinese Shadows
	\| alternatives = ~~[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v9/y1888_007.htm KH]~~		\| alternatives =
	\| translations =		\| translations =
	}}		}}

	~~{{Page aside\|24}}~~
	{{Page aside continues\|23}}		{{Page aside continues\|23}}

	{{Style P-Title\|MISCELLANEOUS NOTES}}		{{Style P-Title\|MISCELLANEOUS NOTES}}
	~~{{Vertical space\|}}~~

	<center>[Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 5, January, 1888, pp. 406-7, 421-22]~~</center>~~		{{HPB-CW-comment\|view=center\|[''Lucifer'', Vol. I, No. 5, January, 1888, pp. 406-7, 421-22]}}
	{{Vertical space\|}}		{{Vertical space\|}}

Line 24:		Line 22:

	{{Page aside\|24}}		{{Page aside\|24}}
	A few years—and, who knows? perhaps only few months more, and Protestant England will have reverend scientists explaining to their congregations from the pulpits that Adam and Eve were but the “missing ~~link”—two~~ tailless baboons.		A few years—and, who knows? perhaps only few months more, and Protestant England will have reverend scientists explaining to their congregations from the pulpits that Adam and Eve were but the “missing link”—''two tailless baboons''.

	{{HPB-CW-separator}}		{{HPB-CW-separator}}

	Hence the Spirit of Non-Separateness in esoteric philosophy must be the ~~ONE~~ truth.		Hence the Spirit of ''Non-Separateness'' in esoteric philosophy must be the {{Style S-Small capitals\|one}} ''truth''.

	[What the Ego is, all is] Only this “Ego” is universal, not individual: Absolute Consciousness, not the human Brain.		[What the Ego is, ''all'' is] Only this “Ego” is ''universal'', not ''individual'': ''Absolute'' Consciousness, not the human Brain.

	[The highest and the lowliest are ever thus akin. . .] Then why not term the philosophy ~~“High~~-Low-Idealism” vice “Hylo-Idealism”?		[The highest and the lowliest are ever thus akin. . .] Then why not term the philosophy “''High-Low''-Idealism” ''vice'' “Hylo-Idealism”?

	[. . . everything being, not so much cleansed of God, as very ~~THEOBROMA~~, God’s food and nutrient element. . .] “Theobroma”—the same as cacao-butter. We take exception to the phraseology, not to Dr. Lewins’ ideas.		[. . . everything being, not so much cleansed of God, as very {{Style S-Small capitals\|Theobroma}}, God’s food and nutrient element. . .] “Theobroma”—the same as ''cacao-butter''. We take exception ''to the phraseology'', not to Dr. Lewins’ ideas.

Sergey: Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Miscellaneous Notes | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 9 | pages = 23-24 | publications = Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 5, Ja..."

2024-03-29T16:17:21Z

Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Miscellaneous Notes | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 9 | pages = 23-24 | publications = Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 5, Ja..."

New page

{{HPB-CW-header
| item title = Miscellaneous Notes
| item author = Blavatsky H.P.
| volume = 9
| pages = 23-24
| publications = Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 5, January, 1888, pp. 406-7, 421-22
| scrapbook =
| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - A Note of Explanation
| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Chinese Shadows
| alternatives = [http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v9/y1888_007.htm KH]
| translations =
}}

{{Page aside|24}}
{{Page aside continues|23}}

{{Style P-Title|MISCELLANEOUS NOTES}}
{{Vertical space|}}

<center>[Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 5, January, 1888, pp. 406-7, 421-22]</center>
{{Vertical space|}}

Both the Idealism of Mr. Herbert Spencer, and the Hylo-Idealism of Dr. Lewins are more materialistic and atheistic than any of the honestly declared materialistic views—Büchner’s and Moleschott’s included.

{{Page aside|24}}
A few years—and, who knows? perhaps only few months more, and Protestant England will have reverend scientists explaining to their congregations from the pulpits that Adam and Eve were but the “missing link”—two tailless baboons.

{{HPB-CW-separator}}

Hence the Spirit of Non-Separateness in esoteric philosophy must be the ONE truth.

[What the Ego is, all is] Only this “Ego” is universal, not individual: Absolute Consciousness, not the human Brain.

[The highest and the lowliest are ever thus akin. . .] Then why not term the philosophy “High-Low-Idealism” vice “Hylo-Idealism”?

[. . . everything being, not so much cleansed of God, as very THEOBROMA, God’s food and nutrient element. . .] “Theobroma”—the same as cacao-butter. We take exception to the phraseology, not to Dr. Lewins’ ideas.

Blavatsky H.P. - Miscellaneous Notes (39) - Revision history

Sergey at 12:52, 26 January 2026

Sergey: Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Miscellaneous Notes | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 9 | pages = 23-24 | publications = Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 5, Ja..."