Blavatsky H.P. - Miscellaneous Notes (46) - Revision history

Sergey at 14:08, 27 February 2026

2026-02-27T14:08:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 27 February 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	{{Style P-Quote\|[Thomas May brings forward some Scriptural data in answer to Rev. T. G. Headley’s perplexities on the subject of God and the Devil. He writes: “He is called Satan or Shethen—opposition—and also an Accuser—not, however, a ''false'' accuser—as, in the book ascribed to Job, he is represented as one of the Sons of God, who presents himself with the others, and as such is invested with superior wisdom, directing even the providence of God.” To this, H.P.B. appends the following footnote:]}}		{{Style P-Quote\|[Thomas May brings forward some Scriptural data in answer to Rev. T. G. Headley’s perplexities on the subject of God and the Devil. He writes: “He is called Satan or Shethen—opposition—and also an Accuser—not, however, a ''false'' accuser—as, in the book ascribed to Job, he is represented as one of the Sons of God, who presents himself with the others, and as such is invested with superior wisdom, directing even the providence of God.” To this, H.P.B. appends the following footnote:]}}

	This is undeniable; for we find stated in the ''Zohar'' that the “Ancient of all the Ancients” (Ain-soph, the Kabalists say, the ''Logos'' or At-tee-kah, also Hokhmah, or Wisdom, the Occultists maintain) having evolved or “created” ''Thorah'' (the law, or Dharma) hitherto hidden, {{Page aside\|109}}Thorah forthwith addressed IT (the Ancient of all the Ancients) in these words: ~~“IT~~, that wishes to arrange in order other things, should first arrange Itself in its (to it pertaining) Forms.” And the “Forever concealed” did follow Thorah’s advice and did so arrange its forms as to become manifested as the Universe. And if Thorah, why not Satan?		This is undeniable; for we find stated in the ''Zohar'' that the “Ancient of all the Ancients” (Ain-soph, the Kabalists say, the ''Logos'' or At-tee-kah, also Hokhmah, or Wisdom, the Occultists maintain) having evolved or “created” ''Thorah'' (the law, or Dharma) hitherto hidden, {{Page aside\|109}}Thorah forthwith addressed {{Style S-Small capitals\|It}} (the Ancient of all the Ancients) in these words: “{{Style S-Small capitals\|It}}, that wishes to arrange in order other things, should first arrange Itself in its (to it pertaining) Forms.” And the “Forever concealed” did follow Thorah’s advice and did so arrange its forms as to become manifested as the Universe. And if Thorah, why not Satan?

Sergey at 13:59, 27 February 2026

2026-02-27T13:59:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 27 February 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - From the Note Book of an Unpopular Philosopher (4)		\| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - From the Note Book of an Unpopular Philosopher (4)
	\| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Théosophie et Bouddhisme		\| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Théosophie et Bouddhisme
	\| alternatives = ~~[https://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v10/y1888_072.htm KH]~~		\| alternatives =
	\| translations =		\| translations =
	}}		}}
Line 17:		Line 17:
	{{Vertical space\|}}		{{Vertical space\|}}

	<center>[Lucifer, Vol. III, No. 13, September, 1888, pp. 69, 81-82]~~</center>~~		{{HPB-CW-comment\|view=center\|[''Lucifer'', Vol. III, No. 13, September, 1888, pp. 69, 81-82]}}
	{{Vertical space\|}}		{{Vertical space\|}}

	[Thomas May brings forward some Scriptural data in answer to Rev. T. G. Headley’s perplexities on the subject of God and the Devil. He writes: “He is called Satan or Shethen—opposition—and also an Accuser—not, however, a false accuser—as, in the book ascribed to Job, he is represented as one of the Sons of God, who presents himself with the others, and as such is invested with superior wisdom, directing even the providence of God.” To this, H.P.B. appends the following footnote:]		{{Style P-Quote\|[Thomas May brings forward some Scriptural data in answer to Rev. T. G. Headley’s perplexities on the subject of God and the Devil. He writes: “He is called Satan or Shethen—opposition—and also an Accuser—not, however, a ''false'' accuser—as, in the book ascribed to Job, he is represented as one of the Sons of God, who presents himself with the others, and as such is invested with superior wisdom, directing even the providence of God.” To this, H.P.B. appends the following footnote:]}}

	This is undeniable; for we find stated in the Zohar that the “Ancient of all the Ancients” (Ain-soph, the Kabalists say, the Logos or At-tee-kah, also Hokhmah, or Wisdom, the Occultists maintain) having evolved or “created” Thorah (the law, or Dharma) hitherto hidden, {{Page aside\|109}}Thorah forthwith addressed IT (the Ancient of all the Ancients) in these words: “IT, that wishes to arrange in order other things, should first arrange Itself in its (to it pertaining) Forms.” And the “Forever concealed” did follow Thorah’s advice and did so arrange its forms as to become manifested as the Universe. And if Thorah, why not Satan?		This is undeniable; for we find stated in the ''Zohar'' that the “Ancient of all the Ancients” (Ain-soph, the Kabalists say, the ''Logos'' or At-tee-kah, also Hokhmah, or Wisdom, the Occultists maintain) having evolved or “created” ''Thorah'' (the law, or Dharma) hitherto hidden, {{Page aside\|109}}Thorah forthwith addressed IT (the Ancient of all the Ancients) in these words: “IT, that wishes to arrange in order other things, should first arrange Itself in its (to it pertaining) Forms.” And the “Forever concealed” did follow Thorah’s advice and did so arrange its forms as to become manifested as the Universe. And if Thorah, why not Satan?

Sergey: Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Miscellaneous Notes | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 10 | pages = 108-109 | publications = Lucifer, Vol. III, No...."

2024-04-10T18:16:51Z

Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Miscellaneous Notes | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 10 | pages = 108-109 | publications = Lucifer, Vol. III, No...."

New page

{{HPB-CW-header
| item title = Miscellaneous Notes
| item author = Blavatsky H.P.
| volume = 10
| pages = 108-109
| publications = Lucifer, Vol. III, No. 13, September, 1888, pp. 69, 81-82
| scrapbook =
| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - From the Note Book of an Unpopular Philosopher (4)
| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Théosophie et Bouddhisme
| alternatives = [https://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v10/y1888_072.htm KH]
| translations =
}}

{{Page aside continues|108}}

{{Style P-Title|MISCELLANEOUS NOTES}}
{{Vertical space|}}

<center>[Lucifer, Vol. III, No. 13, September, 1888, pp. 69, 81-82]</center>
{{Vertical space|}}

[Thomas May brings forward some Scriptural data in answer to Rev. T. G. Headley’s perplexities on the subject of God and the Devil. He writes: “He is called Satan or Shethen—opposition—and also an Accuser—not, however, a false accuser—as, in the book ascribed to Job, he is represented as one of the Sons of God, who presents himself with the others, and as such is invested with superior wisdom, directing even the providence of God.” To this, H.P.B. appends the following footnote:]

This is undeniable; for we find stated in the Zohar that the “Ancient of all the Ancients” (Ain-soph, the Kabalists say, the Logos or At-tee-kah, also Hokhmah, or Wisdom, the Occultists maintain) having evolved or “created” Thorah (the law, or Dharma) hitherto hidden, {{Page aside|109}}Thorah forthwith addressed IT (the Ancient of all the Ancients) in these words: “IT, that wishes to arrange in order other things, should first arrange Itself in its (to it pertaining) Forms.” And the “Forever concealed” did follow Thorah’s advice and did so arrange its forms as to become manifested as the Universe. And if Thorah, why not Satan?