Blavatsky H.P. - Science - Revision history

Pavel Malakhov at 09:10, 8 June 2025

2025-06-08T09:10:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:10, 8 June 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\| volume = 1		\| volume = 1
	\| pages = 384-385		\| pages = 384-385
	\| publications =		\| publications = Isis Unveiled, New York: J. W. Bouton, 1877
	\| scrapbook = 7:140		\| scrapbook = 7:140
	\| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - The ~~Ârya Samâj~~		\| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - The Arya Samaj
	\| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Letter to the Editor of the ~~“Tiflis Messenger”~~		\| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Letter to the Editor of the Tiflis Messenger
	\| alternatives =		\| alternatives =
	\| translations =		\| translations =
Line 15:		Line 15:

	{{Style P-Title\|SCIENCE}}		{{Style P-Title\|SCIENCE}}

			{{HPB-CW-comment\|[The cutting of this article is pasted in H.P.B.’s {{SB-page\|v=7\|p=140\|text=''Scrapbook'', Vol. VII, p. 140}}, and the text is printed in a lay-out similar to an article by S. Watson, dated May 28, 1878, and published in the ''Voice of Truth'', of Memphis, Saturday, June 1st. There is no further identification of its actual source or date.]<ref>This is a fragment from ''Isis Unveiled'', {{IU-page\|v=1\|p=5\|text=vol. 1, ch. 1, p. 5}}. </ref>}}
	{{Vertical space\|}}		{{Vertical space\|}}

	{{HPB-CW-comment\|[The cutting of this article is pasted in H.P.B.’s {{SB-page\|v=7\|p=140\|text=''Scrapbook'', Vol. VII, p. 140}}, and the text is printed in a lay-out similar to an article by S. Watson, dated May 28, 1878, and published in the ''Voice of Truth'', of Memphis, Saturday, June 1st. There is no further identification of its actual source or date.]}}

	As it is claimed to be unphilosophical to enquire into first causes, scientists now occupy themselves with considering their physical effects. The field of scientific investigation is therefore bounded by physical nature. When once its limits are reached, enquiry must stop, and their work be recommenced. With all due respect to our learned men, they are like the squirrel upon its revolving wheel, for they are doomed to turn their “matter” over and over again. Science is a mighty potency, and it is not for us pigmies to question her. But the “scientists” are not themselves science embodied any more than the men of our planet are the planet itself. We have neither the right to demand, nor the power to compel, our “modern-day philosopher” to accept without challenge a geographical description of the dark side of the moon. But, if in some lunar cataclysm one of her inhabitants should be hurled thence into the attraction of our atmosphere, and land, safe and sound, at Dr. Carpenter’s door, he would be indictable as recreant to {{Page aside\|385}} professional duty if he should fail to set the physical problem at rest.		As it is claimed to be unphilosophical to enquire into first causes, scientists now occupy themselves with considering their physical effects. The field of scientific investigation is therefore bounded by physical nature. When once its limits are reached, enquiry must stop, and their work be recommenced. With all due respect to our learned men, they are like the squirrel upon its revolving wheel, for they are doomed to turn their “matter” over and over again. Science is a mighty potency, and it is not for us pigmies to question her. But the “scientists” are not themselves science embodied any more than the men of our planet are the planet itself. We have neither the right to demand, nor the power to compel, our “modern-day philosopher” to accept without challenge a geographical description of the dark side of the moon. But, if in some lunar cataclysm one of her inhabitants should be hurled thence into the attraction of our atmosphere, and land, safe and sound, at Dr. Carpenter’s door, he would be indictable as recreant to {{Page aside\|385}} professional duty if he should fail to set the physical problem at rest.

	For a man of science to refuse an opportunity to investigate any new phenomenon, whether it comes to him in the shape of a man from the moon, or a ghost from the Eddy homestead, is alike reprehensible.		For a man of science to refuse an opportunity to investigate any new phenomenon, whether it comes to him in the shape of a man from the moon, or a ghost from the Eddy homestead, is alike reprehensible.

	{{Style P-Signature in capitals\|H. P. Blavatsky.}}		{{Style P-Signature in capitals\|H. P. Blavatsky.}}


			{{Footnotes}}

Sergey at 08:37, 31 May 2025

2025-05-31T08:37:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:37, 31 May 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - The Ârya Samâj		\| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - The Ârya Samâj
	\| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Letter to the Editor of the “Tiflis Messenger”		\| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Letter to the Editor of the “Tiflis Messenger”
	\| alternatives = ~~[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v1/y1878_027.htm KH]~~		\| alternatives =
	\| translations =		\| translations =
	}}		}}
Line 17:		Line 17:
	{{Vertical space\|}}		{{Vertical space\|}}

	{{HPB-CW-comment\|[The cutting of this article is pasted in H.P.B.’s {{SB-page\|v=7\|p=140\|text=Scrapbook, Vol. VII, p. 140}}, and the text is printed in a lay-out similar to an article by S. Watson, dated May 28, 1878, and published in the Voice of Truth, of Memphis, Saturday, June 1st. There is no further identification of its actual source or date.]}}		{{HPB-CW-comment\|[The cutting of this article is pasted in H.P.B.’s {{SB-page\|v=7\|p=140\|text=''Scrapbook'', Vol. VII, p. 140}}, and the text is printed in a lay-out similar to an article by S. Watson, dated May 28, 1878, and published in the ''Voice of Truth'', of Memphis, Saturday, June 1st. There is no further identification of its actual source or date.]}}

	As it is claimed to be unphilosophical to enquire into first causes, scientists now occupy themselves with considering their physical effects. The field of scientific investigation is therefore bounded by physical nature. When once its limits are reached, enquiry must stop, and their work be recommenced. With all due respect to our learned men, they are like the squirrel upon its revolving wheel, for they are doomed to turn their “matter” over and over again. Science is a mighty potency, and it is not for us pigmies to question her. But the “scientists” are not themselves science embodied any more than the men of our planet are the planet itself. We have neither the right to demand, nor the power to compel, our “modern-day philosopher” to accept without challenge a geographical description of the dark side of the moon. But, if in some lunar cataclysm one of her inhabitants should be hurled thence into the attraction of our atmosphere, and land, safe and sound, at Dr. Carpenter’s door, he would be indictable as recreant to {{Page aside\|385}} professional duty if he should fail to set the physical problem at rest.		As it is claimed to be unphilosophical to enquire into first causes, scientists now occupy themselves with considering their physical effects. The field of scientific investigation is therefore bounded by physical nature. When once its limits are reached, enquiry must stop, and their work be recommenced. With all due respect to our learned men, they are like the squirrel upon its revolving wheel, for they are doomed to turn their “matter” over and over again. Science is a mighty potency, and it is not for us pigmies to question her. But the “scientists” are not themselves science embodied any more than the men of our planet are the planet itself. We have neither the right to demand, nor the power to compel, our “modern-day philosopher” to accept without challenge a geographical description of the dark side of the moon. But, if in some lunar cataclysm one of her inhabitants should be hurled thence into the attraction of our atmosphere, and land, safe and sound, at Dr. Carpenter’s door, he would be indictable as recreant to {{Page aside\|385}} professional duty if he should fail to set the physical problem at rest.

	For a man of science to refuse an opportunity to investigate any new phenomenon, whether it comes to him in the shape of a man from the moon, or a ghost from the Eddy homestead, is alike reprehensible.		For a man of science to refuse an opportunity to investigate any new phenomenon, whether it comes to him in the shape of a man from the moon, or a ghost from the Eddy homestead, is alike reprehensible.
	{{Style P-Signature\|H. P. ~~BLAVATSKY~~.}}		{{Style P-Signature in capitals\|H. P. Blavatsky.}}

Sergey at 17:48, 6 October 2023

2023-10-06T17:48:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 6 October 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - The Ârya Samâj		\| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - The Ârya Samâj
	\| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Letter to the Editor of the “Tiflis Messenger”		\| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Letter to the Editor of the “Tiflis Messenger”
	\| alternatives = [http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v1/y1878_027.htm ~~KHL~~]		\| alternatives = [http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v1/y1878_027.htm KH]
	\| translations =		\| translations =
	}}		}}

Sergey at 01:03, 30 September 2023

2023-09-30T01:03:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 30 September 2023
Line 17:		Line 17:
	{{Vertical space\|}}		{{Vertical space\|}}

	{{HPB-CW-comment\|[The cutting of this article is pasted in H.P.B.’s Scrapbook, Vol. VII, p. 140, and the text is printed in a lay-out similar to an article by S. Watson, dated May 28, 1878, and published in the Voice of Truth, of Memphis, Saturday, June 1st. There is no further identification of its actual source or date.]}}		{{HPB-CW-comment\|[The cutting of this article is pasted in H.P.B.’s {{SB-page\|v=7\|p=140\|text=Scrapbook, Vol. VII, p. 140}}, and the text is printed in a lay-out similar to an article by S. Watson, dated May 28, 1878, and published in the Voice of Truth, of Memphis, Saturday, June 1st. There is no further identification of its actual source or date.]}}

	As it is claimed to be unphilosophical to enquire into first causes, scientists now occupy themselves with considering their physical effects. The field of scientific investigation is therefore bounded by physical nature. When once its limits are reached, enquiry must stop, and their work be recommenced. With all due respect to our learned men, they are like the squirrel upon its revolving wheel, for they are doomed to turn their “matter” over and over again. Science is a mighty potency, and it is not for us pigmies to question her. But the “scientists” are not themselves science embodied any more than the men of our planet are the planet itself. We have neither the right to demand, nor the power to compel, our “modern-day philosopher” to accept without challenge a geographical description of the dark side of the moon. But, if in some lunar cataclysm one of her inhabitants should be hurled thence into the attraction of our atmosphere, and land, safe and sound, at Dr. Carpenter’s door, he would be indictable as recreant to {{Page aside\|385}} professional duty if he should fail to set the physical problem at rest.		As it is claimed to be unphilosophical to enquire into first causes, scientists now occupy themselves with considering their physical effects. The field of scientific investigation is therefore bounded by physical nature. When once its limits are reached, enquiry must stop, and their work be recommenced. With all due respect to our learned men, they are like the squirrel upon its revolving wheel, for they are doomed to turn their “matter” over and over again. Science is a mighty potency, and it is not for us pigmies to question her. But the “scientists” are not themselves science embodied any more than the men of our planet are the planet itself. We have neither the right to demand, nor the power to compel, our “modern-day philosopher” to accept without challenge a geographical description of the dark side of the moon. But, if in some lunar cataclysm one of her inhabitants should be hurled thence into the attraction of our atmosphere, and land, safe and sound, at Dr. Carpenter’s door, he would be indictable as recreant to {{Page aside\|385}} professional duty if he should fail to set the physical problem at rest.

Sergey at 10:35, 28 September 2023

2023-09-28T10:35:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:35, 28 September 2023
Line 12:		Line 12:
	}}		}}

	{{Page aside\|384}}		{{Page aside continues\|384}}

	{{Style P-Title\|SCIENCE}}		{{Style P-Title\|SCIENCE}}

Sergey: Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Science | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 1 | pages = 384-385 | publications = | scrapbook = 7:140 | previous..."

2023-09-06T16:49:56Z

Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Science | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 1 | pages = 384-385 | publications = | scrapbook = 7:140 | previous..."

New page

{{HPB-CW-header
| item title = Science
| item author = Blavatsky H.P.
| volume = 1
| pages = 384-385
| publications =
| scrapbook = 7:140
| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - The Ârya Samâj
| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Letter to the Editor of the “Tiflis Messenger”
| alternatives = [http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v1/y1878_027.htm KHL]
| translations =
}}

{{Page aside|384}}

{{Style P-Title|SCIENCE}}
{{Vertical space|}}

{{HPB-CW-comment|[The cutting of this article is pasted in H.P.B.’s Scrapbook, Vol. VII, p. 140, and the text is printed in a lay-out similar to an article by S. Watson, dated May 28, 1878, and published in the Voice of Truth, of Memphis, Saturday, June 1st. There is no further identification of its actual source or date.]}}

As it is claimed to be unphilosophical to enquire into first causes, scientists now occupy themselves with considering their physical effects. The field of scientific investigation is therefore bounded by physical nature. When once its limits are reached, enquiry must stop, and their work be recommenced. With all due respect to our learned men, they are like the squirrel upon its revolving wheel, for they are doomed to turn their “matter” over and over again. Science is a mighty potency, and it is not for us pigmies to question her. But the “scientists” are not themselves science embodied any more than the men of our planet are the planet itself. We have neither the right to demand, nor the power to compel, our “modern-day philosopher” to accept without challenge a geographical description of the dark side of the moon. But, if in some lunar cataclysm one of her inhabitants should be hurled thence into the attraction of our atmosphere, and land, safe and sound, at Dr. Carpenter’s door, he would be indictable as recreant to {{Page aside|385}} professional duty if he should fail to set the physical problem at rest.

For a man of science to refuse an opportunity to investigate any new phenomenon, whether it comes to him in the shape of a man from the moon, or a ghost from the Eddy homestead, is alike reprehensible.
{{Style P-Signature|H. P. BLAVATSKY.}}