Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
13,190
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
{{Style S-Small capitals|Several}} years ago, a distinguished writer and persecuted kabalist suggested a creed for the Protestant and Roman Catholic bodies, which may be thus formulated: | {{Style S-Small capitals|Several}} years ago, a distinguished writer and persecuted kabalist suggested a creed for the Protestant and Roman Catholic bodies, which may be thus formulated: | ||
<center> | <center>''Protevangelium''.</center> | ||
{{Style P- | {{Style P-Poem|poem=“I believe in the Devil, the Father Almighty of Evil, the Destroyer of all things, Perturbator of Heaven and Earth; | ||
And in Anti-Christ, his only Son, our Persecutor, | And in Anti-Christ, his only Son, our Persecutor, | ||
Who was conceived of the Evil Spirit; | Who was conceived of the Evil Spirit; | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
The coalition of the wicked; | The coalition of the wicked; | ||
The perdition of the body; | The perdition of the body; | ||
And the Death and Hell everlasting. {{ | And the Death and Hell everlasting. ''Amen''.” }} | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | |||
Does this offend? Does it seem extravagant, cruel, blasphemous? Listen. In the city of New York, on the ninth day of April, 1877—that is to say, in the last quarter of what is proudly styled the century of discovery and the age of illumination—the following scandalous ideas were broached. We quote from the report in the {{Style S-Italic|Sun}} of the following morning: | Does this offend? Does it seem extravagant, cruel, blasphemous? Listen. In the city of New York, on the ninth day of April, 1877—that is to say, in the last quarter of what is proudly styled the century of discovery and the age of illumination—the following scandalous ideas were broached. We quote from the report in the {{Style S-Italic|Sun}} of the following morning: | ||
Line 57: | Line 59: | ||
{{Footnotes start}} | {{Footnotes start}} | ||
{{Footnote return|fn1819}} So firmly established seems to have been the reputation of the Brahmans and Buddhists for the highest morality, and that since time immemorial, that we find Colonel Henry Yule, in his admirable edition of “Marco Polo,” giving the following testimony: “The high virtues ascribed to the Brahman and Indian merchants were, perhaps, in part, matter of tradition . . . but the eulogy is so constant among mediæval travellers {{Style S-Italic|that it must have had a solid foundation.}} In fact, it would not be difficult to trace a chain of similar testimony from ancient times down to our own. Arrian says no Indian was ever accused of falsehood. Hwen T’sang ascribes to the people of India eminent uprightness, honesty, and disinterestedness. Friar Jordanus (''circa'' 1330) says the people of Lesser India (Sindh and Western India) were true in speech and eminent in justice; and we may also refer to the high character given to the Hindus by Abul Fazl. But {{Style S-Italic|after}} 150 {{Style S-Italic|years of European trade, indeed, we find a sad deterioration}}. . . . Yet Pallas, in the last century, noticing the Bamyan colony at Astrakhan, says its members were notable for an upright dealing that made them greatly preferable to Armenians. And that wise and admirable public servant, the late Sir William Sleeman, in our own time, has said that he knew no class of men in the world more strictly honorable than the mercantile classes of India.”<sup>1</sup> | {{Footnote return|*|fn1819}} So firmly established seems to have been the reputation of the Brahmans and Buddhists for the highest morality, and that since time immemorial, that we find Colonel Henry Yule, in his admirable edition of “Marco Polo,” giving the following testimony: “The high virtues ascribed to the Brahman and Indian merchants were, perhaps, in part, matter of tradition . . . but the eulogy is so constant among mediæval travellers {{Style S-Italic|that it must have had a solid foundation.}} In fact, it would not be difficult to trace a chain of similar testimony from ancient times down to our own. Arrian says no Indian was ever accused of falsehood. Hwen T’sang ascribes to the people of India eminent uprightness, honesty, and disinterestedness. Friar Jordanus (''circa'' 1330) says the people of Lesser India (Sindh and Western India) were true in speech and eminent in justice; and we may also refer to the high character given to the Hindus by Abul Fazl. But {{Style S-Italic|after}} 150 {{Style S-Italic|years of European trade, indeed, we find a sad deterioration}}. . . . Yet Pallas, in the last century, noticing the Bamyan colony at Astrakhan, says its members were notable for an upright dealing that made them greatly preferable to Armenians. And that wise and admirable public servant, the late Sir William Sleeman, in our own time, has said that he knew no class of men in the world more strictly honorable than the mercantile classes of India.”<sup>1</sup> | ||
The sad examples of the rapid demoralization of {{Style S-Italic|savage}} American Indians, as soon as they are made to live in a close proximity with {{Style S-Italic|Christian}} officials and missionaries, are familiar in our modern days. | The sad examples of the rapid demoralization of {{Style S-Italic|savage}} American Indians, as soon as they are made to live in a close proximity with {{Style S-Italic|Christian}} officials and missionaries, are familiar in our modern days. | ||
Line 65: | Line 67: | ||
{{Footnotes end}} | {{Footnotes end}} | ||
{{ | {{Page|475|THE DEVIL IN ALL HIS ASPECTS.}} | ||
But we challenge any honest man in the wide world to say whether he thinks the Brahman was far from the truth in saying of the missionary Stoddard, “this man beats us all” in lying. What else would he say, if the latter preached to them the doctrine of {{Style S-Italic|eternal damnation,}} because, indeed, they had passed their lives without reading a Jewish book of which they never heard, or asked salvation of a Christ whose existence they never suspected! But Baptist clergymen who need a few thousand dollars must devise terrifying sensations to fire the congregational heart. | {{Style P-No indent|But we challenge any honest man in the wide world to say whether he thinks the Brahman was far from the truth in saying of the missionary Stoddard, “this man beats us all” in lying. What else would he say, if the latter preached to them the doctrine of {{Style S-Italic|eternal damnation,}} because, indeed, they had passed their lives without reading a Jewish book of which they never heard, or asked salvation of a Christ whose existence they never suspected! But Baptist clergymen who need a few thousand dollars must devise terrifying sensations to fire the congregational heart.}} | ||
We abstain, as a rule, from giving our own experience when we can call acceptable witnesses, and so, upon reading missionary Stoddard’s outrageous remarks, we requested our acquaintance, Mr. William L. D. O’Grady,{{Footnote mark|*|fn1820}} to give a fair opinion upon the missionaries. This gentleman’s father and grandfather were British army officers, and he himself was born in India, and enjoyed life-long opportunities to learn what the general opinion among the English is of these religious propagandists. Following is his communication in reply to our letter: | We abstain, as a rule, from giving our own experience when we can call acceptable witnesses, and so, upon reading missionary Stoddard’s outrageous remarks, we requested our acquaintance, Mr. William L. D. O’Grady,{{Footnote mark|*|fn1820}} to give a fair opinion upon the missionaries. This gentleman’s father and grandfather were British army officers, and he himself was born in India, and enjoyed life-long opportunities to learn what the general opinion among the English is of these religious propagandists. Following is his communication in reply to our letter: | ||
Line 83: | Line 85: | ||
{{Style P-Quote|{{Style P-No indent|India Company, and which supports unsectarian education, gives them no countenance whatever. Protected from personal violence, they yelp and bark at natives and Europeans alike, after the fashion of ill-conditioned curs. Often recruited from the poorest specimens of theological fanaticism, they are regarded on all sides as mischievous. Their rabid, reckless, vulgar, and offensive propagandism caused the great Mutiny of 1857. They are noisome humbugs.}} | {{Style P-Quote|{{Style P-No indent|India Company, and which supports unsectarian education, gives them no countenance whatever. Protected from personal violence, they yelp and bark at natives and Europeans alike, after the fashion of ill-conditioned curs. Often recruited from the poorest specimens of theological fanaticism, they are regarded on all sides as mischievous. Their rabid, reckless, vulgar, and offensive propagandism caused the great Mutiny of 1857. They are noisome humbugs.}} | ||
{{Style P-Align right| | {{Style P-Align right|“{{Style S-Small capitals|Wm. L. D. O’Grady}}.}} | ||
“{{Style S-Small capitals|New York}}, June 12, 1877.” }} | |||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
Line 100: | Line 102: | ||
{{Footnote return|*|fn1821}} Ecclesiastes xii. 13; see Tayler Lewis’s “Metrical Translation.” | {{Footnote return|*|fn1821}} Ecclesiastes xii. 13; see Tayler Lewis’s “Metrical Translation.” | ||
{{Style P- | {{Style P-Poem|poem= “The great conclusion here; | ||
Fear God and His commandments keep, for this is all of man.” }} | Fear God and His commandments keep, for this is all of man.” }} | ||
Line 505: | Line 507: | ||
What better commentary than this upon the fashionable preacher, who “{{Style S-Italic|multiplieth}} words without knowledge!” This magnificent {{Style S-Italic|prophetic}} satire might have been written to prefigure the spirit that prevails in all the denominations of Christians. | What better commentary than this upon the fashionable preacher, who “{{Style S-Italic|multiplieth}} words without knowledge!” This magnificent {{Style S-Italic|prophetic}} satire might have been written to prefigure the spirit that prevails in all the denominations of Christians. | ||
Job hearkens to the words of wisdom, and then the “Lord” answers Job “out of the whirlwind” of nature, God’s first visible manifestation: “Stand still, O Job, stand still! and consider the wondrous works of God; for {{Style S-Italic|by them alone}} thou canst know God. ‘Behold, God is great, and {{Style S-Italic|we know him not,’}} Him who ‘maketh small the drops of water; {{Style S-Italic|but they}} pour down rain {{Style S-Italic|according to the vapor thereof;’”{{ | Job hearkens to the words of wisdom, and then the “Lord” answers Job “out of the whirlwind” of nature, God’s first visible manifestation: “Stand still, O Job, stand still! and consider the wondrous works of God; for {{Style S-Italic|by them alone}} thou canst know God. ‘Behold, God is great, and {{Style S-Italic|we know him not,’}} Him who ‘maketh small the drops of water; {{Style S-Italic|but they}} pour down rain {{Style S-Italic|according to the vapor thereof;’”{{Footnote mark|*|fn1876}}}} not according to the divine whim, but to the once established and immutable laws. Which law “removeth the mountains and they know not; which shaketh the earth; which commandeth the sun, {{Style S-Italic|and it riseth not;}} and sealeth up the stars; . . . which doeth great things {{Style S-Italic|past finding out;}} yea, and {{Style S-Italic|wonders without number}}. . . . Lo, {{Style S-Italic|He goeth by me,}} and I see {{Style S-Italic|him not;}} he passeth on also, but {{Style S-Italic|I perceive him not!”{{Footnote mark|†|fn1877}}}} | ||
Then, “Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?”{{Footnote mark|‡|fn1878}} speaks the voice of God through His mouthpiece—nature. “Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, {{Style S-Italic|if thou knowest?}} When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? . . . Wast thou present when I said to the seas, ‘Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further; and here shall thy proud waves be stayed?’ . . . Knowest thou who hath caused it to rain on the earth, {{Style S-Italic|where no man is;}} on the wilderness, wherein {{Style S-Italic|there is no man.}} . . . Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands | Then, “Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?”{{Footnote mark|‡|fn1878}} speaks the voice of God through His mouthpiece—nature. “Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, {{Style S-Italic|if thou knowest?}} When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? . . . Wast thou present when I said to the seas, ‘Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further; and here shall thy proud waves be stayed?’ . . . Knowest thou who hath caused it to rain on the earth, {{Style S-Italic|where no man is;}} on the wilderness, wherein {{Style S-Italic|there is no man.}} . . . Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands | ||
Line 527: | Line 529: | ||
Job, now in modest confidence, responded: | Job, now in modest confidence, responded: | ||
{{Style P- | {{Style P-Poem|poem=“I know that thou canst do everything, | ||
And that no thought of thine can be resisted. | And that no thought of thine can be resisted. | ||
Who is he that maketh a show of arcane wisdom, | Who is he that maketh a show of arcane wisdom, | ||
Line 620: | Line 622: | ||
{{Style P-Poem|poem=“New Light has arisen: | {{Style P-Poem|poem=“New Light has arisen: | ||
Coming from Heaven, it assumed a mortal form. . . . | Coming from Heaven, it assumed a mortal form. . . . | ||
Virgin, receive God in thy pure bosom— | :: —— Virgin, receive God in thy pure bosom— | ||
And the Word flew into her womb: | :: And the Word flew into her womb: | ||
Becoming incarnate in Time, and animated by her body, | Becoming incarnate in Time, and animated by her body, | ||
It was found in a mortal image, and a Boy was created | It was found in a mortal image, and a Boy was created | ||
Line 827: | Line 829: | ||
{{Footnotes start}} | {{Footnotes start}} | ||
{{Footnote return|*|fn1918 | {{Footnote return|*|fn1918}} Saturn is Bel-Moloch and even Hercules and Siva. Both of the latter are {{Style S-Italic|Harakala}}, or gods of the war, of the battle, or the “Lords of Hosts.” Jehovah is called “a man of war” in Exodus xv. 3. “The Lord of Hosts is his name” (Isaiah li. 15), and David blesses him for teaching his “hands to war and his fingers to fight” (Psalms cxliv. 1). Saturn is also the Sun, and Movers says that “Kronos Saturn was called by the Phœnicians {{Style S-Italic|Israel”}} (130). Philo says the same (in Euseb., p. 44). | ||
{{Footnote return|†|fn1919}} “Blessed be Iahoh, Alahim, Alahi, {{Style S-Italic|Israel”}} (Psalm lxii.). | {{Footnote return|†|fn1919}} “Blessed be Iahoh, Alahim, Alahi, {{Style S-Italic|Israel”}} (Psalm lxii.). | ||
Line 896: | Line 898: | ||
{{Footnotes end}} | {{Footnotes end}} | ||
{{ | {{Page|517|SATAN’S WATERLOO!}} | ||
{{Style P-No indent|are repeated in {{Style S-Italic|Nicodemus.}} Follows a scene of confusion, horror, and lamenting. Perceiving that the battle is lost, the Prince of Hell turns tail and prudently chooses to side with the strongest. He against whom, according to Jude and Peter, even the Archangel Michael “durst not bring a railing accusation before the Lord,” is now shamefully treated by his ex-ally and friend, the “Prince of Hell.” Poor Satan is abused and reviled for all his crimes both by devils and saints; while the {{Style S-Italic|Prince}} is openly rewarded for his treachery. Addressing him, the King of Glory says thus: “Beelzebub, the Prince of Hell, Satan the Prince shall now be subject to thy dominion {{Style S-Italic|forever, in the room of Adam}} and his righteous sons, who are mine . . . Come to me, all ye my saints, who were {{Style S-Italic|created in my image,}} who {{Style S-Italic|were condemned by the tree of the forbidden fruit,}} and {{Style S-Italic|by the Devil and death.}} Live now {{Style S-Italic|by the wood of my cross;}} the Devil, the prince of this world is overcome (?) and {{Style S-Italic|Death is conquered.}} “Then the Lord takes hold of Adam by his right hand, of David by the left, and “{{Style S-Italic|ascends}} from Hell, followed by all the saints,” Enoch and Elias, and by the “{{Style S-Italic|holy}} thief.”{{Footnote mark|*|fn1933}}}} | {{Style P-No indent|are repeated in {{Style S-Italic|Nicodemus.}} Follows a scene of confusion, horror, and lamenting. Perceiving that the battle is lost, the Prince of Hell turns tail and prudently chooses to side with the strongest. He against whom, according to Jude and Peter, even the Archangel Michael “durst not bring a railing accusation before the Lord,” is now shamefully treated by his ex-ally and friend, the “Prince of Hell.” Poor Satan is abused and reviled for all his crimes both by devils and saints; while the {{Style S-Italic|Prince}} is openly rewarded for his treachery. Addressing him, the King of Glory says thus: “Beelzebub, the Prince of Hell, Satan the Prince shall now be subject to thy dominion {{Style S-Italic|forever, in the room of Adam}} and his righteous sons, who are mine . . . Come to me, all ye my saints, who were {{Style S-Italic|created in my image,}} who {{Style S-Italic|were condemned by the tree of the forbidden fruit,}} and {{Style S-Italic|by the Devil and death.}} Live now {{Style S-Italic|by the wood of my cross;}} the Devil, the prince of this world is overcome (?) and {{Style S-Italic|Death is conquered.}} “Then the Lord takes hold of Adam by his right hand, of David by the left, and “{{Style S-Italic|ascends}} from Hell, followed by all the saints,” Enoch and Elias, and by the “{{Style S-Italic|holy}} thief.”{{Footnote mark|*|fn1933}}}} | ||
Line 1,005: | Line 1,007: | ||
Who was conceived of the Holy Ghost, }} | Who was conceived of the Holy Ghost, }} | ||
523 ROBERT TAYLOR’S CREDO. | {{Page|523|ROBERT TAYLOR’S CREDO.}} | ||
{{Style P-Poem|poem=Born of the Virgin Elektra, | {{Style P-Poem|poem=Born of the Virgin Elektra, | ||
Line 1,020: | Line 1,022: | ||
And the Life Everlasting. }} | And the Life Everlasting. }} | ||
The Israelites have been proved to have worshipped Baal, the Syrian Bacchus, offered incense to the Sabazian or Æsculapian serpent, and performed the Dionysian Mysteries. And how could it be otherwise if Typhon was called Typhon Set, | The Israelites have been proved to have worshipped Baal, the Syrian Bacchus, offered incense to the Sabazian or Æsculapian serpent, and performed the Dionysian Mysteries. And how could it be otherwise if Typhon was called Typhon Set,{{Footnote mark|*|fn1943}} and Seth, the son of Adam, is identical with Satan or Sat-an; and Seth was worshipped by the Hittites? Less than two centuries b.c., we find the Jews either reverencing or simply worshipping the “golden head of an ass” in their temple; according to Apion, Antiochus Epiphanes carried it off with him. And Zacharias is struck dumb by the apparition of the deity under the shape of an ass in the temple!{{Footnote mark|†|fn1944}} | ||
{{Footnotes start}} | |||
{{Footnote return|*|fn1943}} Seth or Sutech, “Rawlinson’s History of Herodotus,” book ii., appendix. viii., 23. | |||
{{Footnote return|†|fn1944}} The fact is vouchsafed for by Epiphanius. See Hone: “Apocryphal New Testament;” “The Gospel of the Birth of Mary.” | |||
In his able article “Bacchus, the Prophet-God,” Professor A. Wilder remarks that “Tacitus was misled into thinking that the Jews worshipped an ass, the symbol of Typhon or Seth, the Hyk-sos God. The Egyptian name of the ass was | In his able article “Bacchus, the Prophet-God,” Professor A. Wilder remarks that “Tacitus was misled into thinking that the Jews worshipped an ass, the symbol of Typhon or Seth, the Hyk-sos God. The Egyptian name of the ass was ''co'', the phonetic of Iao;” and hence, probably, he adds, “a symbol from that mere circumstance.” We can hardly agree with this learned archæologist, for the idea that the Jews reverenced, for some mysterious reason, Typhon under his symbolical representation rests on more proof than one. And for one we find a passage in the “Gospel of Mary,” is cited from Epiphanius, which corroborates the fact. It relates to the death of “Zacharias, the father of John the Baptist, murdered by Herod,” says the Protevangelion. Epiphanius writes that the cause of the death of Zacharias was that upon seeing a vision in the temple he, through surprise, was willing to disclose it, but his mouth was stopped. That which he saw was at the time of his offering incense, and it was a man standing in the form of an ass. When he was gone out, and had a mind to speak thus to the people, {{Style S-Italic|Woe unto you, whom do ye worship?}} he who had appeared unto him in the temple took away the use of his speech. Afterward when he recovered it, and was able to speak, he declared this to the Jews, and they slew him. They (the Gnostics) add in this book, that on this very account the high priest was commanded by the law-giver (Moses) to carry little bells, that whensoever he went into the temple to sacrifice, he {{Style S-Italic|whom they worshipped,}} hearing the noise of the bells, might have time enough to hide himself, and not be caught in that ugly shape and figure” (Epiph.). | ||
{{Footnotes end}} | |||
524 ISIS UNVEILED. | {{Page|524|ISIS UNVEILED.}} | ||
El, the Sun-God of the Syrians, the Egyptians, and the Semites, is declared by Pleytè to be no other than Set or Seth, and El is the primeval Saturn—Israel. | El, the Sun-God of the Syrians, the Egyptians, and the Semites, is declared by Pleytè to be no other than Set or Seth, and El is the primeval Saturn—Israel.{{Footnote mark|*|fn1945}} Siva is an Æthiopian God, the same as the Chaldean Baal—Bel; thus he is also Saturn. Saturn, El, Seth and Kiyun, or the biblical Chiun of Amos, are all one and the same deity, and may be all regarded in their worst aspect as Typhon the Destroyer. When the religious Pantheon assumed a more definite expression, Typhon was separated from his androgyne—the {{Style S-Italic|good}} deity, and fell into degradation as a brutal {{Style S-Italic|unintellectual}} power. | ||
Such reactions in the religious feelings of a nation were not unfrequent. The Jews had worshipped Baal or Moloch, the Sun-God Hercules, | Such reactions in the religious feelings of a nation were not unfrequent. The Jews had worshipped Baal or Moloch, the Sun-God Hercules,{{Footnote mark|†|fn1946}} in their early days—if they had any days at all earlier than the Persians or Maccabees—and then made their prophets denounce them. On the other hand, the characteristics of the Mosaic Jehovah exhibit more of the moral disposition of Siva than of a benevolent, “long-suffering” God. Besides, to be identified with Siva is no small compliment, for the latter is God of wisdom. Wilkinson depicts him as the most intellectual of the Hindu gods. He is {{Style S-Italic|three-eyed,}} and, like Jehovah, terrible in his resistless revenge and wrath. And, although the Destroyer, “yet he is the re-creator of all things in perfect wisdom.”{{Footnote mark|‡|fn1947}} He is the type of St. Augustine’s God who “prepares {{Style S-Italic|hell}} for pryers into his mysteries,” and insists on trying human reason as well as common sense by forcing mankind to view with equal reverence his good and evil acts. | ||
Notwithstanding the numerous proofs that the Israelites worshipped a variety of gods, and even offered human sacrifices until a far later period than their Pagan neighbors, they have contrived to blind posterity in regard to truth. They sacrificed human life as late as 169 b.c., | Notwithstanding the numerous proofs that the Israelites worshipped a variety of gods, and even offered human sacrifices until a far later period than their Pagan neighbors, they have contrived to blind posterity in regard to truth. They sacrificed human life as late as 169 b.c.,{{Footnote mark|§|fn1948}} and the {{Style S-Italic|Bible}} contains a number of such records. At a time when the Pagans had long abandoned the abominable practice, and had replaced the sacrificial man by the animal,{{Footnote mark|║|fn1949}} Jephthah is represented sacrificing his own daughter to the “Lord” for a burnt-offering. | ||
The denunciations of their own prophets are the best proofs against them. Their worship in high places is the same as that of the “idolaters.” Their prophetesses are counterparts of the Pythiæ and Bacchantes. Pausanias speaks of women-colleges which superintend the worship of | The denunciations of their own prophets are the best proofs against them. Their worship in high places is the same as that of the “idolaters.” Their prophetesses are counterparts of the Pythiæ and Bacchantes. Pausanias speaks of women-colleges which superintend the worship of | ||
{{Footnotes start}} | |||
{{Footnote return|*|fn1945}} “Phallism in Ancient Religions,” by Staniland Wake and Westropp, p. 74. | |||
{{Footnote return|†|fn1946}} Hercules is also a god-fighter as well as Jacob-Israel. | |||
{{Footnote return|‡|fn1947}} “Phallism in Ancient Religions,” p. 75. | |||
{{Footnote return|§|fn1948}} Antiochus Epiphanius found in 169 b.c. in the Jewish temple, a man kept there to be sacrificed. Apion: “Joseph. contra Apion,” ii., 8. | |||
{{Footnote return|║|fn1949}} The ox of Dionysus was sacrificed at the Bacchic Mysteries. See “Anthon,” p. 365. | |||
{{Footnotes end}} | |||
525 HUMAN SACRIFICES AMONG THE JEWS. | {{Page|525|HUMAN SACRIFICES AMONG THE JEWS.}} | ||
Bacchus, and of the sixteen matrons of Elis. | {{Style P-No indent|Bacchus, and of the sixteen matrons of Elis.{{Footnote mark|*|fn1950}} The {{Style S-Italic|Bible}} says that “Deborah, a prophetess . . . judged Israel at that time;”{{Footnote mark|†|fn1951}} and speaks of Huldah, another prophetess, who “dwelt in Jerusalem, {{Style S-Italic|in the college;”{{Footnote mark|‡|fn1952}}}} and 2 {{Style S-Italic|Samuel}} mentions “{{Style S-Italic|wise}} women” several times,{{Footnote mark|§|fn1953}} notwithstanding the injunction of Moses not to use either divination or augury. As to the final and conclusive identification of the “Lord God” of Israel with Moloch, we find a very suspicious evidence of the case in the last chapter of {{Style S-Italic|Leviticus,}} concerning {{Style S-Italic|things devoted not to be redeemed}}. . . . A man shall devote unto the Lord of all that he hath, {{Style S-Italic|both of man}} and beast. . . . None devoted, which shall be devoted of men, shall be redeemed, {{Style S-Italic|but shall surely be put to death}} . . . for it is {{Style S-Italic|most holy unto the Lord.”{{Footnote mark|║|fn1954}}}}}} | ||
The duality, if not the plurality of the gods of Israel may be inferred from the very fact of such bitter denunciations. Their prophets {{Style S-Italic|never approved of sacrificial worship.}} Samuel denied that the Lord had any delight in burnt-offerings and sacrifices (1 {{Style S-Italic|Samuel,}} xv. 22). Jeremiah asserted, unequivocally, that the Lord, Yava Sabaoth Elohe Israel, never commanded anything of the sort, but contrariwise (vii. 21-24). | The duality, if not the plurality of the gods of Israel may be inferred from the very fact of such bitter denunciations. Their prophets {{Style S-Italic|never approved of sacrificial worship.}} Samuel denied that the Lord had any delight in burnt-offerings and sacrifices (1 {{Style S-Italic|Samuel,}} xv. 22). Jeremiah asserted, unequivocally, that the Lord, Yava Sabaoth Elohe Israel, never commanded anything of the sort, but contrariwise (vii. 21-24). | ||
Line 1,058: | Line 1,064: | ||
The question is likely to be asked: “In the view of so much evidence to show that Christian theology is only a {{Style S-Italic|pot-pourri}} of Pagan mythologies, how can it be connected with the religion of Moses?” The early Christians, Paul and his disciples, the Gnostics and their successors generally, regarded Christianity and Judaism as essentially distinct. The | The question is likely to be asked: “In the view of so much evidence to show that Christian theology is only a {{Style S-Italic|pot-pourri}} of Pagan mythologies, how can it be connected with the religion of Moses?” The early Christians, Paul and his disciples, the Gnostics and their successors generally, regarded Christianity and Judaism as essentially distinct. The | ||
{{Footnotes start}} | |||
{{Footnote return|*|fn1950}} “Paus.,” 5, 16. | |||
{{Footnote return|†|fn1951}} Judges iv. 4. | |||
{{Footnote return|‡|fn1952}} 2 Kings, xxii. 14. | |||
{{Footnote return|§|fn1953}} xiv. 2; xx. 16, 17. | |||
{{Footnote return|║|fn1954}} xxvii. 28, 29. | |||
{{Footnotes end}} | |||
526 ISIS UNVEILED. | {{Page|526|ISIS UNVEILED.}} | ||
latter, in their view, was an antagonistic system, and from a lower origin. “Ye received the law,” said Stephen, “from the ministration of angels,” or æons, and not from the Most High Himself. The Gnostics, as we have seen, taught that Jehovah, the Deity of the Jews, was Ilda-Baoth, the son of the ancient | {{Style P-No indent|latter, in their view, was an antagonistic system, and from a lower origin. “Ye received the law,” said Stephen, “from the ministration of angels,” or æons, and not from the Most High Himself. The Gnostics, as we have seen, taught that Jehovah, the Deity of the Jews, was Ilda-Baoth, the son of the ancient ''Bohu'', or Chaos, the adversary of Divine Wisdom.}} | ||
The question may be more than easily answered. The {{Style S-Italic|law of Moses, and the so-called monotheism of the Jews, can hardly be said to have been more than two or three centuries older than Christianity.}} The {{Style S-Italic|Pentateuch}} itself, we are able to show, was written and revised upon this “new departure,” at a period subsequent to the colonization of Judea under the authority of the kings of Persia. The Christian Fathers, in their eagerness to make their new system dovetail with Judaism, and so avoid Paganism, unconsciously shunned Scylla only to be caught in the whirlpool of Charybdis. Under the monotheistic stucco of Judaism was unearthed the same familiar mythology of Paganism. But we should not regard the Israelites with less favor for having had a Moloch and being like the natives. Nor should we compel the Jews to do penance for their fathers. They had their prophets and their law, and were satisfied with them. How faithfully and nobly they have stood by their ancestral faith under the most diabolical persecutions, the present remains of a once-glorious people bear witness. The Christian world has been in a state of convulsion from the first to the present century; it has been cleft into thousands of sects; but the Jews remain substantially united. Even their differences of opinion do not destroy their unity. | The question may be more than easily answered. The {{Style S-Italic|law of Moses, and the so-called monotheism of the Jews, can hardly be said to have been more than two or three centuries older than Christianity.}} The {{Style S-Italic|Pentateuch}} itself, we are able to show, was written and revised upon this “new departure,” at a period subsequent to the colonization of Judea under the authority of the kings of Persia. The Christian Fathers, in their eagerness to make their new system dovetail with Judaism, and so avoid Paganism, unconsciously shunned Scylla only to be caught in the whirlpool of Charybdis. Under the monotheistic stucco of Judaism was unearthed the same familiar mythology of Paganism. But we should not regard the Israelites with less favor for having had a Moloch and being like the natives. Nor should we compel the Jews to do penance for their fathers. They had their prophets and their law, and were satisfied with them. How faithfully and nobly they have stood by their ancestral faith under the most diabolical persecutions, the present remains of a once-glorious people bear witness. The Christian world has been in a state of convulsion from the first to the present century; it has been cleft into thousands of sects; but the Jews remain substantially united. Even their differences of opinion do not destroy their unity. | ||
Line 1,080: | Line 1,088: | ||
The Rosicrucian motto, “{{Style S-Italic|Igne natura renovatur integra,”}} which the alchemists interpret as nature renovated by fire, or matter by spirit, is | The Rosicrucian motto, “{{Style S-Italic|Igne natura renovatur integra,”}} which the alchemists interpret as nature renovated by fire, or matter by spirit, is | ||
527 REAL MEANING OF THE LETTERS I. H. S. | {{Page|527|REAL MEANING OF THE LETTERS I. H. S.}} | ||
made to be accepted to this day as {{Style S-Italic|Iesus Nazarenus rex Iudæorum.}} The mocking satire of Pilate is accepted literally, and the Jews made to unwittingly confess thereby the royalty of Christ; whereas, if the inscription is not a forgery of the Constantinian period, it yet is the action of Pilate, against which the Jews were first to violently protest. I. H. S. is interpreted {{Style S-Italic|Iesus Hominum Salvator,}} and {{Style S-Italic|In hoc signo,}} whereas ΙΗΣ is one of the most ancient names of Bacchus. And more than ever do we begin to find out, by the bright light of comparative theology, that the great object of Jesus, the initiate of the inner sanctuary, was to open the eyes of the fanatical multitude to the difference between the highest Divinity—the mysterious and never-mentioned IAO of the ancient Chaldean and later Neo-platonic initiates—and the Hebrew Yahuh, or Yaho (Jehovah). The modern Rosicrucians, so violently denounced by the Catholics, now find brought against them, as the most important charge, the fact that they accuse Christ of having destroyed the worship of Jehovah. Would to Heaven he could have been allowed the time to do so, for the world would not have found itself still bewildered, after nineteen centuries of mutual massacres, among 300 quarrelling sects, and with a personal Devil reigning over a terrorized Christendom! | {{Style P-No indent|made to be accepted to this day as {{Style S-Italic|Iesus Nazarenus rex Iudæorum.}} The mocking satire of Pilate is accepted literally, and the Jews made to unwittingly confess thereby the royalty of Christ; whereas, if the inscription is not a forgery of the Constantinian period, it yet is the action of Pilate, against which the Jews were first to violently protest. I. H. S. is interpreted {{Style S-Italic|Iesus Hominum Salvator,}} and {{Style S-Italic|In hoc signo,}} whereas ΙΗΣ is one of the most ancient names of Bacchus. And more than ever do we begin to find out, by the bright light of comparative theology, that the great object of Jesus, the initiate of the inner sanctuary, was to open the eyes of the fanatical multitude to the difference between the highest Divinity—the mysterious and never-mentioned IAO of the ancient Chaldean and later Neo-platonic initiates—and the Hebrew Yahuh, or Yaho (Jehovah). The modern Rosicrucians, so violently denounced by the Catholics, now find brought against them, as the most important charge, the fact that they accuse Christ of having destroyed the worship of Jehovah. Would to Heaven he could have been allowed the time to do so, for the world would not have found itself still bewildered, after nineteen centuries of mutual massacres, among 300 quarrelling sects, and with a personal Devil reigning over a terrorized Christendom!}} | ||
True to the exclamation of David, paraphrased in {{Style S-Italic|King James’ Version}} as “all the gods of the nations are idols,” {{Style S-Italic|i.e}}., devils, Bacchus or the “first-born” or the Orphic theogony, the Monogenes, or “only-begotten” of Father Zeus and Koré, was transformed, with the rest of the ancient myths, into a devil. By such a degradation, the Fathers, whose pious zeal could only be surpassed by their ignorance, have unwittingly furnished evidence against themselves. They have, with their own hands, paved the way for many a future solution, and greatly helped modern students of the science of religions. | True to the exclamation of David, paraphrased in {{Style S-Italic|King James’ Version}} as “all the gods of the nations are idols,” {{Style S-Italic|i.e}}., devils, Bacchus or the “first-born” or the Orphic theogony, the Monogenes, or “only-begotten” of Father Zeus and Koré, was transformed, with the rest of the ancient myths, into a devil. By such a degradation, the Fathers, whose pious zeal could only be surpassed by their ignorance, have unwittingly furnished evidence against themselves. They have, with their own hands, paved the way for many a future solution, and greatly helped modern students of the science of religions. | ||
Line 1,090: | Line 1,098: | ||
“Such was the Jove of Nysa to his worshippers,” concludes the author. “He represented to them alike the world of nature and the world of thought. He was the ‘Sun of righteousness, with healing on his wings,’ and he not only brought joy to mortals, but opened to them hope beyond mortality of immortal life. Born of a human mother, he raised her from | “Such was the Jove of Nysa to his worshippers,” concludes the author. “He represented to them alike the world of nature and the world of thought. He was the ‘Sun of righteousness, with healing on his wings,’ and he not only brought joy to mortals, but opened to them hope beyond mortality of immortal life. Born of a human mother, he raised her from | ||
528 ISIS UNVEILED. | {{Page|528|ISIS UNVEILED.}} | ||
the world of death to the supernal air, to be revered and worshipped. At once lord of all worlds, he was in them all alike the Saviour. | {{Style P-No indent|the world of death to the supernal air, to be revered and worshipped. At once lord of all worlds, he was in them all alike the Saviour.}} | ||
“Such was Bacchus, the prophet-god. A change of cultus, decreed by the Murderer-Imperial, the Emperor Theodosius, at the instance of Ghostly-Father Ambrosius, of Milan, has changed his title to Father of Lies. His worship, before universal, was denominated Pagan or {{Style S-Italic|local,}} and his rites stigmatized as witchcraft. His orgies received the name of {{Style S-Italic|Witches’ Sabbath,}} and his favorite symbolical form with the bovine foot became the modern representative of the Devil with the cloven hoof. The master of the house having been called Beelzebub, they of his household were alike denounced as having commerce with the powers of darkness. Crusades were undertaken; whole peoples massacred. Knowledge and the higher learning were denounced as magic and sorcery. Ignorance became the mother of devotion—such as was then cherished. Galileo languished long years in prison for teaching that the sun was in the centre of the solar universe. Bruno was burned alive at Rome in 1600 for reviving the ancient philosophy; yet, queerly enough, the Liberalia have become a festival of the Church, | “Such was Bacchus, the prophet-god. A change of cultus, decreed by the Murderer-Imperial, the Emperor Theodosius, at the instance of Ghostly-Father Ambrosius, of Milan, has changed his title to Father of Lies. His worship, before universal, was denominated Pagan or {{Style S-Italic|local,}} and his rites stigmatized as witchcraft. His orgies received the name of {{Style S-Italic|Witches’ Sabbath,}} and his favorite symbolical form with the bovine foot became the modern representative of the Devil with the cloven hoof. The master of the house having been called Beelzebub, they of his household were alike denounced as having commerce with the powers of darkness. Crusades were undertaken; whole peoples massacred. Knowledge and the higher learning were denounced as magic and sorcery. Ignorance became the mother of devotion—such as was then cherished. Galileo languished long years in prison for teaching that the sun was in the centre of the solar universe. Bruno was burned alive at Rome in 1600 for reviving the ancient philosophy; yet, queerly enough, the Liberalia have become a festival of the Church,{{Footnote mark|*|fn1955}} Bacchus is a saint in the calendar four times repeated, and at many a shrine he may be seen reposing in the arms of his deified mother. The names are changed; the ideas remain as before.”{{Footnote mark|†|fn1956}} | ||
And now that we have shown that we must indeed “bid an eternal farewell to all the rebellious angels,” we naturally pass to an examination of the God Jesus, who was manufactured out of the man Jesus to redeem us from these very mythical devils, as Father Ventura shows us. This labor will of course necessitate once more a comparative inquiry into the history of Gautama-Buddha, his doctrines and his “miracles,” and those of Jesus and the predecessor of both—Christna. | And now that we have shown that we must indeed “bid an eternal farewell to all the rebellious angels,” we naturally pass to an examination of the God Jesus, who was manufactured out of the man Jesus to redeem us from these very mythical devils, as Father Ventura shows us. This labor will of course necessitate once more a comparative inquiry into the history of Gautama-Buddha, his doctrines and his “miracles,” and those of Jesus and the predecessor of both—Christna. | ||
{{Footnotes start}} | |||
{{Footnote return|*|fn1955}} The festival denominated Liberalia occurred on the seventeenth of March, now St. Patrick’s Day. Thus Bacchus was also the patron saint of the Irish. | |||
{{Footnote return|†|fn1956}} Prof. A. Wilder: “Bacchus, the Prophet-God,” in the June number (1877) of the “Evolution, a Review of Polities, Religion, Science, Literature, and Art.” | |||
{{Footnotes end}} |