Malakhov P. - Coronavirus - a Medicine from Aggression: Difference between revisions

Malakhov P. - Coronavirus - a Medicine from Aggression (view source)

Revision as of 14:25, 10 May 2020

5 bytes added , 10 May 2020

m

no edit summary

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted

11,028

edits

Revision as of 14:22, 10 May 2020 (view source) Pavel Malakhov (addition \| contribs) mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:25, 10 May 2020 (view source) Pavel Malakhov (addition \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:
	{{Style S-Dialog speaker\|Enquirer}}. – But don't you think that the fuss made about it is just someone’s skilled manipulation of public opinion?		{{Style S-Dialog speaker\|Enquirer}}. – But don't you think that the fuss made about it is just someone’s skilled manipulation of public opinion?

	{{Style S-Dialog speaker\|Thinker}}. – Of course, there are always those who are willing to use any opportunity for selfish interests, but we should not generalize anything. ~~Governments~~ use this as an occasion to check the combat readiness of their people, as a practice alert. I can't see anything wrong in it. On the contrary, I consider it right and necessary to use this situation for training a variety of rescue services, perfecting the interaction between the departments responsible for safety in emergency situations. For the country's leadership this is an opportunity to test people readiness for joint action in case of serious threats. The civic solidarity and responsibility must have their probation and consolidation tools. Any skill can only be developed through a certain action. Speculation and planning alone are not enough.		{{Style S-Dialog speaker\|Thinker}}. – Of course, there are always those who are willing to use any opportunity for selfish interests, but we should not generalize anything. Some governments use this as an occasion to check the combat readiness of their people, as a practice alert. I can't see anything wrong in it. On the contrary, I consider it right and necessary to use this situation for training a variety of rescue services, perfecting the interaction between the departments responsible for safety in emergency situations. For the country's leadership this is an opportunity to test people readiness for joint action in case of serious threats. The civic solidarity and responsibility must have their probation and consolidation tools. Any skill can only be developed through a certain action. Speculation and planning alone are not enough.