Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
7,788
edits
HPB-SB-1-138: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| item = 2 | | item = 2 | ||
| type = article | | type = article | ||
| status = | | status = proofread | ||
| continues = | | continues = | ||
| author = Wyld, R. S. | | author = Wyld, R. S. | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| untitled = | | untitled = | ||
| source title = London Spiritualist | | source title = London Spiritualist | ||
| source details = | | source details = v. 4, No. 189, April 7, 1876, pp. 166-7 | ||
| publication date = | | publication date = 1876-04-07 | ||
| original date = | | original date = 1876-03-31 | ||
| notes = | | notes = | ||
| categories = | | categories = | ||
}} | }} | ||
... | {{Style S-Small capitals|Sir}}, —It seems to me that the views I have held for many years regarding the dynamical constitution of physical bodies, if it does not explain, at least enables us to accept as possible, the alleged appearance of those presentations which, according to modern language, are called materialized spirit forms. | ||
Though I am not a Spiritualist, not having had an opportunity of witnessing and judging for myself, yet I confess I am not one who can treat with contempt phenomena which are attested by so many seemingly competent and credible persons in England and America. Perhaps it may interest some of your readers if I explain what appears to be the bearing of my theory on Spiritualism, or at least as regards these abnormal manifestations to which I have referred. To begin then, I do not believe in matter in the ordinary sense of the word. The atoms of which all visible and tangible things consist, I conceive to be mere centres of force. I gave my reasons for holding this opinion in a paper read to the Royal Society of Edinburgh (March, 1865), and again in a recent volume—''The Physics and Philosophy of the Senses'', chap. 1. It is acknowledged by philosophers that we never perceive matter, that is, the substratum or immediate underlying cause of physical bodies. We are merely conscious of certain exhibitions of localized force or energy, as, for instance, of solidity or resisting force of gravity and inertia forces, acting in different and special ways. Bodies are visible because of their repelling the luminous vibrations which affect the eye. Taste and smell again are due to an action on the nerves of these senses. All these properties of bodies evidently imply energy or power, and we are conscious of nothing else than force, or the results of force, in any physical body; physical bodies may therefore be fairly regarded, not as natural, but as dynamical or spiritual. Their atoms are held together by attractive force, and this force, as modem science has shown, may be successively resolved into equivalent measures of electricity, heat, light, and magnetic attraction. Force acting in any of these last-mentioned ways I call ''free'' ''anatomatic or transmissible force'', while solid, visible, and tangible bodies I call ''atomic bodies'', because force in them is localized or materialized in the atomic form, which is not the case, as far as science has discovered, in transmissible force. When, therefore, a spirit becomes visible and tangible, according to my theory it must be held that the spiritual being has the ability of converting the free an-atomic force which it possesses, and which constitutes in fact the essence of its being as a spirit, into the ''atomic'' constitution peculiar to visible, solid bodies. | |||
If, then, it can be proved that spirits can thus materialize themselves, this will furnish strong confirmation of the dynamical theory of the world which I hold. You may, therefore, believe I am actuated by no blind prejudice against the phenomena of Spiritualism. But there are much stronger grounds for a man desiring the establishment of Spiritualism; there are grounds connected both with religion and philosophy which should induce most men to welcome phenomena which, by establishing the verity of the supernatural or superphysical, supply a ready answer to the thousand objections of modern sceptics regarding the verity of the Gospel narrative. What strength and significance, for instance, would the phenomena of which we have been talking throw upon the doctrine of the resurrection and ascension of the body of Christ! —a doctrine so fondly held and so persistently enforced by the Apostles who had sojourned with Him in the flesh, but which has been so scorned by some modern critics as a thing impossible. “It was sown a natural body; it was raised a spiritual body.” This assertion offers no difficulty to any one holding the dynamical theory of matter, and it occurs to me that this theory may therefore, perhaps, commend itself to devout Spiritualists as affording a natural explanation of the phenomena in which they believe. | |||
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|R. S. Wyld.}} | {{Style P-Signature in capitals|R. S. Wyld.}} | ||
Edinburgh, March 31, 1876. | |||
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}} | |||
{{HPB-SB-footer- | {{HPB-SB-footer-sources}} | ||
<gallery widths=300px heights=300px> | |||
london_spiritualist_n.189_1876-04-07.pdf|page=12|London Spiritualist, v. 4, No. 189, April 7, 1876, pp. 166-7 | |||
</gallery> | |||