Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
13,404
edits
(Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Miscellaneous Notes | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 12 | pages = 119 | publications = Lucifer, Vol. V, No. 30, Fe...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Muddled Meddlers | | previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Muddled Meddlers | ||
| next = Blavatsky H.P. - The Cycle Moveth | | next = Blavatsky H.P. - The Cycle Moveth | ||
| alternatives = | | alternatives = | ||
| translations = | | translations = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
{{HPB-CW-comment|view=center|[''Lucifer'', Vol. V, No. 30, February, 1890, p. 477]}} | |||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
{{HPB-CW-comment|[In the course of a scholarly article on the subject of the Ego and the Unmanifested Being, Vicomte de Figuanière states that “the indestructiblity of Force resides in the fact that the action of the Unmanifested is ceaseless, and that Force being limited by its primordial modes . . . . no perfect or absolute equilibrium is verified . . .” To this, H.P.B. remarks:]}} | {{Style P-Quote|{{HPB-CW-comment|[In the course of a scholarly article on the subject of the Ego and the Unmanifested Being, Vicomte de Figuanière states that “the indestructiblity of Force resides in the fact that the action of the Unmanifested is ''ceaseless'', and that Force being limited by its primordial modes . . . . no perfect or ''absolute'' equilibrium is verified . . .” To this, H.P.B. remarks:]}}}} | ||
Harmony in motion, Inertia in motion, and Activity in motion—not to be mistaken for unmanifested “action”— three in one and one in three. Or two positives and a neuter, through which the dominion of one passes to the other, the latter meanwhile acting as the | ''Harmony'' in motion, ''Inertia'' in motion, and ''Activity'' in motion—not to be mistaken for unmanifested “action”— three in one and one in three. Or two ''positives'' and a ''neuter'', through which the dominion of one passes to the other, the latter meanwhile acting as the ''negative''—a mere ''aspect'', for the negative, as such, is non-extant; till the “neuter,” as ''radically'' untrue as the negative—becomes in its turn a positive, namely the phase of attraction called gravitation—for it is only ''one'' phase of a ''triple'' fact, that is, ''latent will''; the other two modes of attraction being ''manifested will'', one now prevailing in ''organic'' states, whilst the third, as a dominant, is the compatibility of ''super-organic'' states. With the latter objection we concur heartily.—Editor, ''Lucifer''. | ||