Jump to content

Blavatsky H.P. - Queries and Answers: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 53: Line 53:


{{Page aside|328}}
{{Page aside|328}}
{{HPB-CW-comment|view=center|{{HPB-CW-comment|[Explaining, in answer to a query, certain phenomena of clairvoyance in the condition of sleep, H.P.B. stresses the following points:]}}}}
{{HPB-CW-comment|[Explaining, in answer to a query, certain phenomena of clairvoyance in the condition of sleep, H.P.B. stresses the following points:]}}


This . . . . . reminds one of the old Spiritualistic claim that a medium’s body ''may be disintegrated'' by the Spirits and carried by them through walls to any distance, and rematerialized as easily. Mrs. Marshall, we are asked to believe, was so disintegrated, and carried three miles off from her bedroom and ''rebuilt'' and dropped on a table of a dark ''séance'' room. Occultism, however, denies such possibility. It teaches that no living creature, man or mosquito, can be so disintegrated and live. This may be done with flowers and minerals, plants and other things which may be made to pass through “solid” roofs and walls; but no living man or being can be dealt with in such fashion without death ensuing. This is what Occultism, backed by logic and common sense, teaches us, for it admits no such thing as a supernatural miracle. Nor has the “umbilical cord” anything to do with “Soul,” ''but only with the astral body'' (the “Double”) whenever the latter is projected outside the body . . . . The image of his friend, the Seer, was of course projected upon his brain and ''through'' his mind; but as the latter was his ''lower'' physical mind (''Kama-manas'') so the “projector was his higher, or Spiritual mind (''Manas'' proper). There is no need, indeed, of any “Spiritual attendant,” man having always in him his own attendant, the reincarnating Higher ''Ego''. Notwithstanding the pitying fling at him by his friend, the “Seer,” who denies him any clairvoyance, the “Dreamer” must undeniabily be a clairvoyant, to have seen, as he did, so vividly and so correctly, his “Frater G.” The vision is very easily explained. He fell asleep thinking of his friend whom he had never seen in body, ''willing'' to see him, and thus passing immediately from the waking to the dreaming state. What wonder then, that his will stirred to powerful action by strong desire, his ''human'' mind (the lower Manas) being paralyzed, moreover, by the sudden sleep of the body, acted through the divine and omniscient “Seer” instead of doing so through his uncertain, human principle of thought, which confuses and throws into confusion all it sees in sleep, {{Page aside|329}}upon awakening? “Kshetrajña” (our Higher Ego), says Indian philosophy, is the embodied Spirit, that which knows all and informs at times our Kshetra (the mortal body). The case of the “Dreamer” was one of such special cases. He saw ''through'' and ''with'' the spiritual, all-seeing eye of his divine Ego. Impressing the sight upon its human, sleeping, and therefore plastic and passive mind and memory, the latter remembered what the Ego had seen upon awakening. This is quite natural and no ''miracle'' is involved.
This . . . . . reminds one of the old Spiritualistic claim that a medium’s body ''may be disintegrated'' by the Spirits and carried by them through walls to any distance, and rematerialized as easily. Mrs. Marshall, we are asked to believe, was so disintegrated, and carried three miles off from her bedroom and ''rebuilt'' and dropped on a table of a dark ''séance'' room. Occultism, however, denies such possibility. It teaches that no living creature, man or mosquito, can be so disintegrated and live. This may be done with flowers and minerals, plants and other things which may be made to pass through “solid” roofs and walls; but no living man or being can be dealt with in such fashion without death ensuing. This is what Occultism, backed by logic and common sense, teaches us, for it admits no such thing as a supernatural miracle. Nor has the “umbilical cord” anything to do with “Soul,” ''but only with the astral body'' (the “Double”) whenever the latter is projected outside the body . . . . The image of his friend, the Seer, was of course projected upon his brain and ''through'' his mind; but as the latter was his ''lower'' physical mind (''Kama-manas'') so the “projector was his higher, or Spiritual mind (''Manas'' proper). There is no need, indeed, of any “Spiritual attendant,” man having always in him his own attendant, the reincarnating Higher ''Ego''. Notwithstanding the pitying fling at him by his friend, the “Seer,” who denies him any clairvoyance, the “Dreamer” must undeniabily be a clairvoyant, to have seen, as he did, so vividly and so correctly, his “Frater G.” The vision is very easily explained. He fell asleep thinking of his friend whom he had never seen in body, ''willing'' to see him, and thus passing immediately from the waking to the dreaming state. What wonder then, that his will stirred to powerful action by strong desire, his ''human'' mind (the lower Manas) being paralyzed, moreover, by the sudden sleep of the body, acted through the divine and omniscient “Seer” instead of doing so through his uncertain, human principle of thought, which confuses and throws into confusion all it sees in sleep, {{Page aside|329}}upon awakening? “Kshetrajña” (our Higher Ego), says Indian philosophy, is the embodied Spirit, that which knows all and informs at times our Kshetra (the mortal body). The case of the “Dreamer” was one of such special cases. He saw ''through'' and ''with'' the spiritual, all-seeing eye of his divine Ego. Impressing the sight upon its human, sleeping, and therefore plastic and passive mind and memory, the latter remembered what the Ego had seen upon awakening. This is quite natural and no ''miracle'' is involved.


{{Footnotes}}
{{Footnotes}}