Jump to content

HPB-SB-4-175: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
That an American Rite, thus spuriously organized, declines to acknowledge the Patent of an English Sovereign Sanctuary, duly recognized by the Grand Orient of France, does not at all invalidate my claim to Masonic honours. As well might Protestants refuse to call the Dominicans Christians, because they—the Protestants—broke away from the Catholic Church and set up for themselves, as for A. and A. Masons of America to deny the validity of a Patent from an English A. and P. Rite body. Though I have nothing to do with American modern Masonry, and do not expect to have, yet, feeling highly honoured by the distinction conferred upon me by Brother Yarker, I mean to stand for my chartered rights, and to recognize no other authority than that of the high Masons of England, who have pleased to send me this unsolicited and unexpected testimonial of their approval of my humble labours.
That an American Rite, thus spuriously organized, declines to acknowledge the Patent of an English Sovereign Sanctuary, duly recognized by the Grand Orient of France, does not at all invalidate my claim to Masonic honours. As well might Protestants refuse to call the Dominicans Christians, because they—the Protestants—broke away from the Catholic Church and set up for themselves, as for A. and A. Masons of America to deny the validity of a Patent from an English A. and P. Rite body. Though I have nothing to do with American modern Masonry, and do not expect to have, yet, feeling highly honoured by the distinction conferred upon me by Brother Yarker, I mean to stand for my chartered rights, and to recognize no other authority than that of the high Masons of England, who have pleased to send me this unsolicited and unexpected testimonial of their approval of my humble labours.


Of a piece with the above is the ignorant rudeness of certain critics who pronounce Cagliostro an “impostor” and his desire of engrafting Eastern Philosophy upon Western Masonry “charlatanism.” Without such a union Western Masonry is a corpse without a soul. As Yarker observes, in his ''Notes on the Scientific and Religious Mysteries of Antiquity'' “As the masonic fraternity is now governed," the craft is becoming a storehouse of "paltry masonic tinsel,"–"rascally merchants," and "masonic eperoros and other charlatans," who swindle their brothers, and feather their nests "out of the aristocratic pretensions which they have tacked on to our institutions,—''ad captandum vulgus''.”<ref>This qoute in HPB CW edition: “. . . As the Masonic fraternity is now governed, the Craft is fast becoming the paradise of the bon vivant . . . the manufacturer of paltry masonic tinsel . . . and the masonic ‘Emperor’ and other charlatans who make power or money out of the aristocratic pretensions which they have tacked on to our institutions—ad captandum vulgus . . .”</ref>
Of a piece with the above is the ignorant rudeness of certain critics who pronounce Cagliostro an “impostor” and his desire of engrafting Eastern Philosophy upon Western Masonry “charlatanism.” Without such a union Western Masonry is a corpse without a soul. As Yarker observes, in his ''Notes on the Scientific and Religious Mysteries of Antiquity'' “As the masonic fraternity is now governed," the craft is becoming a storehouse of "paltry masonic tinsel,"–"rascally merchants," and "masonic eperoros and other charlatans," who swindle their brothers, and feather their nests "out of the aristocratic pretensions which they have tacked on to our institutions,—''ad captandum vulgus''.”<ref>This qoute in [[HPB CWhttp://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v1/y1878_009.htm|HPB CW]] edition: “. . . As the Masonic fraternity is now governed, the Craft is fast becoming the paradise of the bon vivant . . . the manufacturer of paltry masonic tinsel . . . and the masonic ‘Emperor’ and other charlatans who make power or money out of the aristocratic pretensions which they have tacked on to our institutions—ad captandum vulgus . . .”</ref>


Respectfully,
Respectfully,