HPB-SB-5-54: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| notes = | | notes = | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Page|190|Transaction Collection.}} | |||
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued|Transaction Collection|5-53}} | |||
{{Style P- | {{Style P-No indent|should not manage part of the his own share by interrupting other's share and if common holder's shared land is mortgaged, by this (affecting) other share holders’ rights of distribution pertaining to that shared land depending on it. The Disputants say that they have rights on the disputed land. But the party from whom the disputants acquired the rights was not known to other common holders. And now if the respondents want to appeal against etc. they can do so against the party from whom the appellant acquired the land. For this cause, (this court) annuls the judgement of the Sub Judge and confirms the lower court’s orders.}} | ||
... | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| item = 1 | | item = 1 | ||
| type = other | | type = other | ||
| status = | | status = ok | ||
| continues = 55, 56 | | continues = 55, 56 | ||
| author = | | author = | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| untitled = | | untitled = | ||
| source title = | | source title = | ||
| source details = | | source details = In. La. Re. Mumbai Series, No.3, Page 202. | ||
| publication date = | | publication date = | ||
| original date = 1879-02-17 | | original date = 1879-02-17 | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
<center>Judgment Date 17 February 1879</center> | <center>Judgment Date 17 February 1879</center> | ||
<center>Before Hon. Justice West and Hon. Justice Pinhi</center> | |||
<center>J. Carvallo ………………………………….. (Original Plaintiff) Appellant</center> | |||
<center>v/s</center> | |||
<center>Noorbibee and others ………………….(Original Defendants) Respondents</center> | |||
Civil Law of Easement (of 1859 Act 8, Section 194) Pledge/Pawn – Interest – Plaintiff’s court cost. | |||
'''Facts of the Case:''' A&B pledged their home with C for Rupees 250. Later on they assigned and conveyed the same house to D for Rupees 551. D was not aware that A&B {{Style S-HPB SB. Continues on|5-55}} | |||
{{ | {{Footnotes start}} | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki> In. La. Re. Mumbai Series, No.3, Page 202. | |||
{{Footnotes end}} | |||
Latest revision as of 09:13, 2 May 2023
Legend
| 190 | 190 |
< Transaction Collection (continued from page 5-53) >
should not manage part of the his own share by interrupting other's share and if common holder's shared land is mortgaged, by this (affecting) other share holders’ rights of distribution pertaining to that shared land depending on it. The Disputants say that they have rights on the disputed land. But the party from whom the disputants acquired the rights was not known to other common holders. And now if the respondents want to appeal against etc. they can do so against the party from whom the appellant acquired the land. For this cause, (this court) annuls the judgement of the Sub Judge and confirms the lower court’s orders.
The High Court of Bombay
Civil Law of Easement (of 1859 Act 8, Section 194) Pledge/Pawn – Interest – Plaintiff’s court cost.
Facts of the Case: A&B pledged their home with C for Rupees 250. Later on they assigned and conveyed the same house to D for Rupees 551. D was not aware that A&B <... continues on page 5-55 >
* In. La. Re. Mumbai Series, No.3, Page 202.
Editor's notes