HPB-SB-8-34: Difference between revisions

From Teopedia
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 8: Line 8:
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued|Professor Zollner's Experiments With Ddr. Slade|8-33}}
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued|Professor Zollner's Experiments With Ddr. Slade|8-33}}


...
{{Style P-No indent|Professor Zollner concludes with some remarks on the necessity of complete passivity on the part of the observer as regards the conditions under which these manifestations occur, and points out that their unexpected variety, and the fact that the same things are not repeated at will, even when most desired by the sitters, are additional arguments why Slade cannot be credited with doing them himself, since a conjuror has always the greatest success with of repeated tricks. The same rule holds good as in all other scientific work. The impartial and cool observer, who continues patiently watching the operations of nature, is more likely to be rewarded than he who disturbs them by trying to impose his own conditions. As Goethe says:—}}
 
{{Style P-Poem|poem=‘Mysteriously in garish day,
Does Nature hide herself, her beauty veiling,
And when she wills not secrets to betray,
Nor screws nor levers will be found availing.’”}}


{{HPB-SB-item
{{HPB-SB-item

Latest revision as of 07:27, 10 July 2024

vol. 8, p. 34
from Adyar archives of the International Theosophical Society
vol. 8 (September 1878 - September 1879)
 

Legend

  • HPB note
  • HPB highlighted
  • HPB underlined
  • HPB crossed out
  • <Editors note>
  • <Archivist note>
  • Lost or unclear
  • Restored
<<     >>
engрус


< Professor Zollner's Experiments With Ddr. Slade (continued from page 8-33) >

Professor Zollner concludes with some remarks on the necessity of complete passivity on the part of the observer as regards the conditions under which these manifestations occur, and points out that their unexpected variety, and the fact that the same things are not repeated at will, even when most desired by the sitters, are additional arguments why Slade cannot be credited with doing them himself, since a conjuror has always the greatest success with of repeated tricks. The same rule holds good as in all other scientific work. The impartial and cool observer, who continues patiently watching the operations of nature, is more likely to be rewarded than he who disturbs them by trying to impose his own conditions. As Goethe says:—

‘Mysteriously in garish day,
Does Nature hide herself, her beauty veiling,
And when she wills not secrets to betray,
Nor screws nor levers will be found availing.’”

Baltimore Underweriter

October 5, 1878

...

Hierophant Olcott Makes an Explanation

...

A Mission Against Christianity

...


Editor's notes

  1. image by unknown author
  2. Baltimore Underweriter by unknown author
  3. image by unknown author
  4. Hierophant Olcott Makes an Explanation by Olcott Henry S., Sun, The, Sunday, October 13, 1878
  5. A Mission Against Christianity by unknown author
  6. image by unknown author