HPB-SB-10-39: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| item = 2 | | item = 2 | ||
| type = article | | type = article | ||
| status = | | status = proofread | ||
| continues = | | continues = | ||
| author = | | author = Scrutator | ||
| author signed = Scrutator | | author signed = Scrutator | ||
| title = Conditional Immortality | | title = Conditional Immortality | ||
| subtitle = | | subtitle = | ||
| untitled = | | untitled = | ||
| source title = Spiritualist | | source title = London Spiritualist | ||
| source details = No. 369, September 19, 1879, p. 143 | | source details = No. 369, September 19, 1879, p. 143 | ||
| publication date = 1879-09-19 | | publication date = 1879-09-19 | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
}} | }} | ||
... | {{Style S-Small capitals|Sir}},—The papers are a good deal exercised at this time about the “Conditional Immortality Association.” The ''Court Journal ''of September 6th has two paragraphs on the subject. That paper speaks of it as “a curious doctrine by which the gift of eternal life is limited to believers in Christianity only, the future punishment of the impenitent being, at some indefinite period, to be terminated by ''annihilation.” ''It tells us that a large number of delegates were then in London “from the provinces, from Scotland and Ireland,” and that this was the second annual meeting of the society. They have certainly one salient doctrine in common with the Theosophists—that of annihilation—but whether they will be able to hit it off together seems doubtful on other grounds. Still they seem to have had their first general advent in England about the same time, but 1 suppose there is no connection. The ''Daily Telegraph ''of Friday, the 5th inst., tells us that at a public meeting of the above society, in St. George’s Hall, Langham-place, the chairman, Mr. Henry I. Ward, of Liverpool, said, “That the destiny of the lost was eternal death after resurrection, and for the saved eternal life after resurrection. ''It would be necessary to grapple with Spiritualism, and he did not know who could do so but those who believed in this body.” '' | ||
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|Scrutator.}} | |||
{{HPB-SB-item | {{HPB-SB-item | ||
| Line 122: | Line 124: | ||
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}} | {{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}} | ||
{{HPB-SB-footer-sources}} | |||
<gallery widths=300px heights=300px> | |||
london_spiritualist_n.369_1879-09-19.pdf|page=13|London Spiritualist, No. 369, September 19, 1879, p. 143 | |||
</gallery> | |||
Latest revision as of 13:37, 14 August 2024
Legend
Conditional Immortality
Sir,—The papers are a good deal exercised at this time about the “Conditional Immortality Association.” The Court Journal of September 6th has two paragraphs on the subject. That paper speaks of it as “a curious doctrine by which the gift of eternal life is limited to believers in Christianity only, the future punishment of the impenitent being, at some indefinite period, to be terminated by annihilation.” It tells us that a large number of delegates were then in London “from the provinces, from Scotland and Ireland,” and that this was the second annual meeting of the society. They have certainly one salient doctrine in common with the Theosophists—that of annihilation—but whether they will be able to hit it off together seems doubtful on other grounds. Still they seem to have had their first general advent in England about the same time, but 1 suppose there is no connection. The Daily Telegraph of Friday, the 5th inst., tells us that at a public meeting of the above society, in St. George’s Hall, Langham-place, the chairman, Mr. Henry I. Ward, of Liverpool, said, “That the destiny of the lost was eternal death after resurrection, and for the saved eternal life after resurrection. It would be necessary to grapple with Spiritualism, and he did not know who could do so but those who believed in this body.”
Miscellaneous news
...
<Untitled> (We had the pleasure the present...)
...
Editor's notes
Sources
-
London Spiritualist, No. 369, September 19, 1879, p. 143