Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
13,148
edits
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Buddhism was originally atheistic, because the predominant idea was the extinction of pain. Intense contemplation vivified the conviction of the existence of the soul or the immortal and divine principle in the human being and through the soul, the Soul of Souls was made vivid. Buddhism although originally atheistic, was eventually Vedantic in the conception of God, of the soul and the means of attaining ''Nirvana ''or soul life. | Buddhism was originally atheistic, because the predominant idea was the extinction of pain. Intense contemplation vivified the conviction of the existence of the soul or the immortal and divine principle in the human being and through the soul, the Soul of Souls was made vivid. Buddhism although originally atheistic, was eventually Vedantic in the conception of God, of the soul and the means of attaining ''Nirvana ''or soul life. | ||
Calcutta. | |||
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|Although, perhaps, originally atheistic was eventually Vedantee, and {{Style S-HPB SB. HPB crossed out|the means}} tought the knowledge of God and the means of attaining Nirvana or {{Style S-HPB SB. HPB crossed out|lif}} Soul-life.|center}} | {{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|Although, perhaps, originally atheistic was eventually Vedantee, and {{Style S-HPB SB. HPB crossed out|the means}} tought the knowledge of God and the means of attaining Nirvana or {{Style S-HPB SB. HPB crossed out|lif}} Soul-life.|center}} | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| volume = 4 | | volume = 4 | ||
| page = 97 | | page = 97 | ||
| item = | | item =1 | ||
| type = article | | type = article | ||
| status = | | status = proofread | ||
| continues =98, 99 | | continues =98, 99 | ||
| author = | | author = | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| subtitle =Form Manifestations | | subtitle =Form Manifestations | ||
| untitled = | | untitled = | ||
| source title = Spiritualist | | source title = London Spiritualist | ||
| source details = | | source details = No. 275, November 30, 1877, pp. 254-5 | ||
| publication date = 1877-11-30 | | publication date = 1877-11-30 | ||
| original date = | | original date = | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
}} | }} | ||
... | {{Style S-Small capitals|Last}} Monday night, at the ordinary fortnightly meeting of the British National Association of Spiritualists, Mr. Desmond Fitz-Gerald, M.S.Tel.E., presided. There was a large attendance. | ||
{{Style S-HPB SB. Continues on |4-98}} | The Rev. W. Stainton-Moses, M.A., then read the following paper:—“It is now nearly a year* since Miss Kislingbury read a paper in this place on the subject of “Form Manifestations,” in which she pointed out that the term covered a wide area, and might apply to very diverse kinds of phenomena. The choice of that term (erroneously attributed in her recent book by Madame Blavatsky to myself) seemed to me very felicitous, as did the paper in which Miss Kislingbury developed her views with regard to the various phenomena embraced under it. | ||
Nearly six months afterwards† I submitted to this society a paper on the same subject, in which I endeavoured to particularise what had been done in the way of accumulating exact knowledge, and to point out what still remained to be desired. Exact knowledge, when accounts were thoroughly sifted, there was very little. Some fortunate experimenters had, indeed, been in a position to give positive testimony as to the production of a human form which they had seen, and of the existence of which they had assured themselves while the medium was in their sight. But these were conspicuously the exceptions which only served to prove the rule. | |||
“In most cases—practically in all save a tiny percentage—the scientific result was ''nil. ''A medium was secluded from view, and certain forms were more or less visibly perceived to issue from the cabinet in which he {{Style S-HPB SB. Continues on |4-98}} | |||
{{Footnotes start}} | |||
<nowiki>*</nowiki> ''Spiritualist'', Dec. 22, 1876. | |||
† ''Spiritualist'', May 18, 1877. | |||
{{Footnotes end}} | |||
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}} | {{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}} | ||
{{HPB-SB-footer-sources}} | |||
<gallery widths=300px heights=300px> | |||
london_spiritualist_n.275_1877-11-30.pdf|page=4|London Spiritualist, No. 275, November 30, 1877, pp. 254-5 | |||
</gallery> | |||