Blavatsky H.P. - Notice: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Notice | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 11 | pages = 400 | publications = Lucifer, Vol. V, No. 25, September 15,18...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Our Three Objects | | previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Our Three Objects | ||
| next = Blavatsky H.P. - “Going To and Fro in the Earth” | | next = Blavatsky H.P. - “Going To and Fro in the Earth” | ||
| alternatives = | | alternatives = | ||
| translations = | | translations = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
{{HPB-CW-comment|view=center|[''Lucifer'', Vol. V, No. 25, September 15,1889, p. 64]}} | |||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
American Theosophists who may have read in the August | American Theosophists who may have read in the August {{Style S-Small capitals|Lucifer}} in “A Puzzle from Adyar” a reference to a report copied in the ''Theosophist'' from the ''N. Y. Times'', and called by us “bungled and sensational” are notified that the qualification has no direct reference to that particular article, which is not “bungled up” and was written by ''a friend''. Our remark was due to an oversight, the article was not read in the hurry, and was mistaken for some speech by Dr. Keightley at the Chicago Convention; the editor having in mind shorthand reports in general and having no idea of the identity of the two.—({{Style S-Small capitals|Ed.}}) | ||
Revision as of 11:04, 31 March 2026
Publications: Lucifer, Vol. V, No. 25, September 15,1889, p. 64
Also at:
In other languages:
400...
NOTICE
[Lucifer, Vol. V, No. 25, September 15,1889, p. 64]
American Theosophists who may have read in the August Lucifer in “A Puzzle from Adyar” a reference to a report copied in the Theosophist from the N. Y. Times, and called by us “bungled and sensational” are notified that the qualification has no direct reference to that particular article, which is not “bungled up” and was written by a friend. Our remark was due to an oversight, the article was not read in the hurry, and was mistaken for some speech by Dr. Keightley at the Chicago Convention; the editor having in mind shorthand reports in general and having no idea of the identity of the two.—(Ed.)