HPB-SB-4-80: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued |Mad. Blavatsky`s Forthcoming Work |4-79}} | {{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued |Mad. Blavatsky`s Forthcoming Work |4-79}} | ||
... | {{Style P-No indent|Properly, the disembodied ''souls'' of the depraved; these souls having at some time | ||
prior to death separated from themselves their divine spirits, and so lost | |||
their chance for immortality. Once divorced from their bodies, these souls, | |||
(also called astral bodies,) of purely materialistic persons, are | |||
irresistibly attracted to the earth, where they live a temporary and finite | |||
life amid elements congenial to their gross natures. “''After a more or less | |||
prolonged period of time these material souls will begin to disintegrate, | |||
and finally, like a column of mist, be dissolved atom by atom in the | |||
surrounding elements.''” I have, in these quotations, italicised those | |||
passages which, in my opinion, are apt to become points of issue between | |||
the Spiritualists and Madame B.}} | |||
At the same time I suggest that to avoid further confusion of “elemental | |||
and elementary spirits” it would be advisable to designate the latter by | |||
some other name, as for instance, “rudimentary.” If they, as Madame B. | |||
assures us, are liable to be “dissolved,” there must have been some | |||
deficiency in their germ, which would justify their designation as | |||
“rudimentary.” | |||
''On Evolution'', our authoress makes these highly appropriate remarks: | |||
“The development of higher orders of animals from the lower, modern, or | |||
so-called exact, science, holds but to a one-sided, physical evolution, | |||
prudently avoiding and ignoring the higher, or spiritual evolution, which | |||
would force our contemporaries to confess the superiority of the ancient | |||
philosophers and psychologists over themselves. The ancient sages ascending | |||
to the {{Style S-Small capitals|unknowable}}, made their starting-point | |||
from the first manifestation of the unseen, the unavoidable, and from a | |||
strict logical reasoning the absolutely necessary creative Being, the | |||
Demiurgos of the universe. Evolution began with them from pure spirit, | |||
which, descending lower and lower down, assumed at last a visible and | |||
comprehensible form, and became matter. Arrived at this point, they | |||
speculated in the Darwinian method, but on a far more large and | |||
comprehensive basis.” | |||
An important declaration is found under the head of “''Materialization''.” | |||
It reads: | |||
''Materialization.'' A word employed by Spiritualists to indicate the | |||
phenomenon of a “spirit clothing himself with a material form.” The far | |||
less objectionable term “form-manifestation” has been recently suggested by | |||
Mr. Stainton Moses, of London. When the real nature of these apparitions is | |||
better comprehended, a still more appropriate name will doubtless be | |||
adopted. ''To call them “materialized spirits” is inadmissible, for they | |||
are not spirits but'' “{{Style S-Small capitals|animated portrait-statues.}}” | |||
Here a wide field of strife opens between the unveiler of Isis and the | |||
Spiritualists. A great many of the latter, at least, in view of the latest | |||
and most wonderful experiences of Mr. O’Sullivan in Paris, will be prone to | |||
contend that the forms produced through the mediumship of Mr. Firman must | |||
be more than “animated portrait-statues,” supposing even that Madame B. | |||
should be prepared to demonstrate that the fable of Pygmalion may still | |||
become a reality. | |||
“''Soma''.” “This Hindu sacred beverage, answering to the Greek Ambrosia or | |||
nectar drank by the gods of Olympus,” prompts the authoress to make the | |||
following spicy remarks: “Thus the Hindu Soma is mystically and in all | |||
respects the same that the Eucharist supper is to the Christian. The idea | |||
is similar. By means of the sacrificial prayers — the Mantras — this liquor | |||
is supposed to be transformed on the spot into real Soma, or the Angel, and | |||
even into Brahma himself. Some missionaries have expressed themselves very | |||
indignantly about this ceremony, the more so that, generally speaking, the | |||
Brahmans use a kind of spirituous liquor as a substitute. But do the | |||
Christians believe less fervently in the transubstantiation of the | |||
communion wine into the blood of Christ, because this wine happens to be | |||
more or less spirituous? Is not the idea of the symbol attached to it the | |||
same? But the missionaries say that this hour of Soma-drinking is the | |||
golden hour of Satan, who lurks at the bottom of the Hindu sacrificial | |||
cup.” | |||
The very vague and promiscuous use of the terms ''spirit'' and ''soul'', | |||
causes the authoress to state this as her definition of them: Referring to | |||
the work itself, she remarks here only that “spirit” is the “''Nous'' | |||
(νοῦς)” of Plato, the immortal, immaterial and purely divine principle in | |||
man, the crown of the human triad, whereas “''Soul''” is the Psyche or the | |||
''nephesli'' of the Bible, the vital principle or the breath of life which | |||
every animal, down to the infusoria, shares with man.” | |||
Space and time forbidding, I must resist the temptation of making further | |||
quotations, but I trust that what has been quoted will impress the | |||
attentive reader of the Banner with the fact that the forthcoming book of | |||
Madame B. will, under all considerations, range among the most important | |||
contributions to the literature of the modern science of spirit, and be | |||
worth the attention of every thinking student of this. Whether the | |||
authoress will make good the proud title of her work, and this will prove a | |||
true “''Unveiling of Isis, i. e.'',” the lifting of the curtain from the | |||
inner temple of the mysterious goddess, and solve the enigma of nature and | |||
life, I am not prepared to say. I am satisfied, however, that it may tear | |||
some rents into the hitherto indestructible Veil, and allow some peeps into | |||
the sanctissimum of the Unknowable. But not being an adept of the Esoteric | |||
Arcana of “theosophical wisdom,” I would, in view of malevolent opposition, | |||
have preferred ''a less pretentious title'' for the meritorious work of our | |||
learned authoress. Although great things have been done since, nearly a | |||
hundred years ago, ''Goethe'' wrote his great theosophical poem, “''Faust'',” | |||
I believe that to these very days, the days of “materialization,” or | |||
“animated portrait-statues,” remains true what that student of mediæval | |||
magic expressed as the ultimate result of his studies: | |||
{{Style P-Poem|poem= | |||
“Mysterious even in open day, | |||
Nature ''retains her veil'' despite our clamors, | |||
That which she does not ''willingly'' display | |||
Cannot be wrenched ''from her'' with levers, screws and | |||
hammers.” —[''Goethe, Faust, trans. B. Taylor''. | |||
}} | |||
''Brooklyn, Aug.'' 1877. | |||
Revision as of 15:23, 7 July 2026
< Mad. Blavatsky`s Forthcoming Work (continued from page 4-79) >
Properly, the disembodied souls of the depraved; these souls having at some time prior to death separated from themselves their divine spirits, and so lost their chance for immortality. Once divorced from their bodies, these souls, (also called astral bodies,) of purely materialistic persons, are irresistibly attracted to the earth, where they live a temporary and finite life amid elements congenial to their gross natures. “After a more or less prolonged period of time these material souls will begin to disintegrate, and finally, like a column of mist, be dissolved atom by atom in the surrounding elements.” I have, in these quotations, italicised those passages which, in my opinion, are apt to become points of issue between the Spiritualists and Madame B.
At the same time I suggest that to avoid further confusion of “elemental and elementary spirits” it would be advisable to designate the latter by some other name, as for instance, “rudimentary.” If they, as Madame B. assures us, are liable to be “dissolved,” there must have been some deficiency in their germ, which would justify their designation as “rudimentary.”
On Evolution, our authoress makes these highly appropriate remarks: “The development of higher orders of animals from the lower, modern, or so-called exact, science, holds but to a one-sided, physical evolution, prudently avoiding and ignoring the higher, or spiritual evolution, which would force our contemporaries to confess the superiority of the ancient philosophers and psychologists over themselves. The ancient sages ascending to the unknowable, made their starting-point from the first manifestation of the unseen, the unavoidable, and from a strict logical reasoning the absolutely necessary creative Being, the Demiurgos of the universe. Evolution began with them from pure spirit, which, descending lower and lower down, assumed at last a visible and comprehensible form, and became matter. Arrived at this point, they speculated in the Darwinian method, but on a far more large and comprehensive basis.”
An important declaration is found under the head of “Materialization.” It reads:
Materialization. A word employed by Spiritualists to indicate the phenomenon of a “spirit clothing himself with a material form.” The far less objectionable term “form-manifestation” has been recently suggested by Mr. Stainton Moses, of London. When the real nature of these apparitions is better comprehended, a still more appropriate name will doubtless be adopted. To call them “materialized spirits” is inadmissible, for they are not spirits but “animated portrait-statues.”
Here a wide field of strife opens between the unveiler of Isis and the Spiritualists. A great many of the latter, at least, in view of the latest and most wonderful experiences of Mr. O’Sullivan in Paris, will be prone to contend that the forms produced through the mediumship of Mr. Firman must be more than “animated portrait-statues,” supposing even that Madame B. should be prepared to demonstrate that the fable of Pygmalion may still become a reality.
“Soma.” “This Hindu sacred beverage, answering to the Greek Ambrosia or nectar drank by the gods of Olympus,” prompts the authoress to make the following spicy remarks: “Thus the Hindu Soma is mystically and in all respects the same that the Eucharist supper is to the Christian. The idea is similar. By means of the sacrificial prayers — the Mantras — this liquor is supposed to be transformed on the spot into real Soma, or the Angel, and even into Brahma himself. Some missionaries have expressed themselves very indignantly about this ceremony, the more so that, generally speaking, the Brahmans use a kind of spirituous liquor as a substitute. But do the Christians believe less fervently in the transubstantiation of the communion wine into the blood of Christ, because this wine happens to be more or less spirituous? Is not the idea of the symbol attached to it the same? But the missionaries say that this hour of Soma-drinking is the golden hour of Satan, who lurks at the bottom of the Hindu sacrificial cup.”
The very vague and promiscuous use of the terms spirit and soul, causes the authoress to state this as her definition of them: Referring to the work itself, she remarks here only that “spirit” is the “Nous (νοῦς)” of Plato, the immortal, immaterial and purely divine principle in man, the crown of the human triad, whereas “Soul” is the Psyche or the nephesli of the Bible, the vital principle or the breath of life which every animal, down to the infusoria, shares with man.”
Space and time forbidding, I must resist the temptation of making further quotations, but I trust that what has been quoted will impress the attentive reader of the Banner with the fact that the forthcoming book of Madame B. will, under all considerations, range among the most important contributions to the literature of the modern science of spirit, and be worth the attention of every thinking student of this. Whether the authoress will make good the proud title of her work, and this will prove a true “Unveiling of Isis, i. e.,” the lifting of the curtain from the inner temple of the mysterious goddess, and solve the enigma of nature and life, I am not prepared to say. I am satisfied, however, that it may tear some rents into the hitherto indestructible Veil, and allow some peeps into the sanctissimum of the Unknowable. But not being an adept of the Esoteric Arcana of “theosophical wisdom,” I would, in view of malevolent opposition, have preferred a less pretentious title for the meritorious work of our learned authoress. Although great things have been done since, nearly a hundred years ago, Goethe wrote his great theosophical poem, “Faust,” I believe that to these very days, the days of “materialization,” or “animated portrait-statues,” remains true what that student of mediæval magic expressed as the ultimate result of his studies:
“Mysterious even in open day, |
Brooklyn, Aug. 1877.
The Khedive`s Gift to America
...
Isis Unveiled
...
<... continues on page 4-81 >
Editor's notes
