Blavatsky H.P. - Notice: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(незначительные правки) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| volume = 11 | | volume = 11 | ||
| pages = 400 | | pages = 400 | ||
| publications = Lucifer, Vol. V, No. 25, September 15,1889, p. 64 | | publications = Lucifer, Vol. V, No. 25, September 15, 1889, p. 64 | ||
| scrapbook = | | scrapbook = | ||
| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Our Three Objects | | previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Our Three Objects | ||
| next = Blavatsky H.P. - “Going To and Fro in the Earth” | | next = Blavatsky H.P. - “Going To and Fro in the Earth” | ||
| alternatives = | | alternatives = | ||
| translations = | | translations = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
{{HPB-CW-comment| | {{Style P-Align center|1={{HPB-CW-comment|1=<span style="font-size:90%; line-height:115%;">[''Lucifer'', Vol. V, No. 25, September 15, 1889, p. 64]</span>}}}} | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
American Theosophists who may have read in the August {{Style S-Small capitals|Lucifer}} in “A Puzzle from Adyar” a reference to a report copied in the ''Theosophist'' from the ''N. Y. Times'', and called by us “bungled and sensational” are notified that the qualification has no direct reference to that particular article, which is ''not'' “bungled up” and was written by ''a friend''. Our remark was due to an oversight, the article was not read in the hurry, and was mistaken for some speech by Dr. Keightley at the Chicago Convention; the editor having in mind shorthand reports in general and having no idea of the identity of the two.—({{Style S-Small capitals|Ed.}}) | <p style="text-indent:1em;">American Theosophists who may have read in the August {{Style S-Small capitals|Lucifer}} in “A Puzzle from Adyar” a reference to a report copied in the ''Theosophist'' from the ''N. Y. Times'', and called by us “bungled and sensational” are notified that the qualification has no direct reference to that particular article, which is ''not'' “bungled up” and was written by ''a friend''. Our remark was due to an oversight, the article was not read in the hurry, and was mistaken for some speech by Dr. Keightley at the Chicago Convention; the editor having in mind shorthand reports in general and having no idea of the identity of the two. — ({{Style S-Small capitals|Ed.}})</p> | ||
{{Style P-Separator custom}} | |||
Latest revision as of 18:36, 30 October 2026
Publications: Lucifer, Vol. V, No. 25, September 15, 1889, p. 64
Also at:
In other languages:
400...
NOTICE
[Lucifer, Vol. V, No. 25, September 15, 1889, p. 64]
American Theosophists who may have read in the August Lucifer in “A Puzzle from Adyar” a reference to a report copied in the Theosophist from the N. Y. Times, and called by us “bungled and sensational” are notified that the qualification has no direct reference to that particular article, which is not “bungled up” and was written by a friend. Our remark was due to an oversight, the article was not read in the hurry, and was mistaken for some speech by Dr. Keightley at the Chicago Convention; the editor having in mind shorthand reports in general and having no idea of the identity of the two. — (Ed.)