Blavatsky H.P. - The Church and the Doctrine of Atonement: Difference between revisions

692 bytes removed , 29 March

m

no edit summary

6,780

edits

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 {{Style P-No indent|adding that the Tree and Serpent worship was an Oriental cult, “of which the narrative of Adam and Eve is a Semitic form.” Is this admissible orthodoxy?}}
-{{HPB-CW-separator}}
-<sup>†</sup>{{HPB-CW-comment|[This has reference to the second instalment of H.P.B.’s essay on “The Esoteric Character of the Gospels,” Lucifer, Vol. I, December, 1887, p. 300, footnote.—Compiler.]}}
-<sup>‡</sup>The remark made has never been meant as “an answer,” but simply as an observation that the word “Chrêstos” applied to a “good man,” a “human original,” and not to a “good God only.” If such was the intention of Mr. Massey, and he amplifies his idea elsewhere, it was not so amplified in his article in the Agnostic Annual. It is, therefore, simply a bare statement of facts referring to that particular article and no more.
 {{Footnotes}}

Blavatsky H.P. - The Church and the Doctrine of Atonement (view source)