Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
12,898
edits
(Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Miscellaneous Notes | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 9 | pages = 23-24 | publications = Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 5, Ja...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - A Note of Explanation | | previous = Blavatsky H.P. - A Note of Explanation | ||
| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Chinese Shadows | | next = Blavatsky H.P. - Chinese Shadows | ||
| alternatives = | | alternatives = | ||
| translations = | | translations = | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Page aside continues|23}} | {{Page aside continues|23}} | ||
{{Style P-Title|MISCELLANEOUS NOTES}} | {{Style P-Title|MISCELLANEOUS NOTES}} | ||
{{HPB-CW-comment|view=center|[''Lucifer'', Vol. I, No. 5, January, 1888, pp. 406-7, 421-22]}} | |||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
| Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
{{Page aside|24}} | {{Page aside|24}} | ||
A few years—and, who knows? perhaps only few months more, and Protestant England will have reverend scientists explaining to their congregations from the pulpits that Adam and Eve were but the “missing | A few years—and, who knows? perhaps only few months more, and Protestant England will have reverend scientists explaining to their congregations from the pulpits that Adam and Eve were but the “missing link”—''two tailless baboons''. | ||
{{HPB-CW-separator}} | {{HPB-CW-separator}} | ||
Hence the Spirit of Non-Separateness in esoteric philosophy must be the | Hence the Spirit of ''Non-Separateness'' in esoteric philosophy must be the {{Style S-Small capitals|one}} ''truth''. | ||
[What the Ego is, all is] Only this “Ego” is universal, not individual: Absolute Consciousness, not the human Brain. | [What the Ego is, ''all'' is] Only this “Ego” is ''universal'', not ''individual'': ''Absolute'' Consciousness, not the human Brain. | ||
[The highest and the lowliest are ever thus akin. . .] Then why not term the philosophy | [The highest and the lowliest are ever thus akin. . .] Then why not term the philosophy “''High-Low''-Idealism” ''vice'' “Hylo-Idealism”? | ||
[. . . everything being, not so much cleansed of God, as very | [. . . everything being, not so much cleansed of God, as very {{Style S-Small capitals|Theobroma}}, God’s food and nutrient element. . .] “Theobroma”—the same as ''cacao-butter''. We take exception ''to the phraseology'', not to Dr. Lewins’ ideas. | ||