HPB-SB-4-53: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| image = SB-04-053.jpg | | image = SB-04-053.jpg | ||
| notes = | | notes = | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued |Mme Blavatsky on Fakirs| 4-52}} | {{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued |Mme. Blavatsky on Fakirs|4-52}} | ||
{{Style P-No indent|uate from the Buddhist Lamaseries of Tibet; but it is unpardonable to make them wear baggy breeches in the exercise of their religious functions. This is as bad as if a Hindu journalist had represented the Rev. Mr. Beecher entering his pulpit in the scant costume of the fakir—the dhoti, a cloth about the loins; “only that and nothing more.” To account, therefore, for the oft-witnessed, open-air levitations of the Svâmis and Gurus upon the theory of an iron frame concealed beneath the clothing, is as reasonable as Monsieur Babinet’s explanation of the table-tipping and tapping as “unconscious ventriloquism.”}} | |||
You may object to the act of disembowelling, which I am compelled to affirm I have seen performed. It is, as you say, “remarkable”; but still not miraculous. Your suggestion that Dr. Hammond should go and see it is a good one. Science would be the gainer, and your humble correspondent be justified. Are you, however, in a position to guarantee that he would furnish the world of skeptics with an example of “veracious reporting,” if his observation should tend to overthrow the pet theories of what we loosely call science? | |||
Yours very respectfully, | |||
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|H. P. Blavatsky.}} | |||
''New York, March'' 28''th'', 1877. | |||
{{HPB-SB-item | {{HPB-SB-item | ||
| Line 22: | Line 29: | ||
| untitled = | | untitled = | ||
| source title = World,The | | source title = World,The | ||
| source details = March 27,1877 | | source details = New York, March 27, 1877 | ||
| publication date = | | publication date = 1877-03-27 | ||
| original date = | | original date = | ||
| notes = | | notes = | ||
| categories = | | categories = | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|(*) N.Y. <u>World</u> March 27, 1877|center}} | |||
... | ... | ||
{{HPB-SB-item | {{HPB-SB-item | ||
| Line 37: | Line 46: | ||
| type = article | | type = article | ||
| status = wanted | | status = wanted | ||
| continues = | | continues =54 | ||
| author = | | author = | ||
| title = Baron Palm`s Incineratiom | | title = Baron Palm`s Incineratiom | ||
| subtitle = | | subtitle = | ||
| untitled = | | untitled = | ||
| source title =Gazette,The | | source title = Gazette, The | ||
| source details =Montreal, March 1877 | | source details = Montreal, March 1877 | ||
| publication date = | | publication date =1877-03 | ||
| original date = | | original date = | ||
| notes = | | notes = Some lost words recovered by HPB. | ||
| categories = | | categories = | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|March 1876|center}} | |||
... | ... | ||
{{Style S-HPB SB. Continues on | 4- | {{Style S-HPB SB. Continues on|4-54}} | ||
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}} | |||
Latest revision as of 21:28, 13 December 2022
Legend
< Mme. Blavatsky on Fakirs (continued from page 4-52) >
uate from the Buddhist Lamaseries of Tibet; but it is unpardonable to make them wear baggy breeches in the exercise of their religious functions. This is as bad as if a Hindu journalist had represented the Rev. Mr. Beecher entering his pulpit in the scant costume of the fakir—the dhoti, a cloth about the loins; “only that and nothing more.” To account, therefore, for the oft-witnessed, open-air levitations of the Svâmis and Gurus upon the theory of an iron frame concealed beneath the clothing, is as reasonable as Monsieur Babinet’s explanation of the table-tipping and tapping as “unconscious ventriloquism.”
You may object to the act of disembowelling, which I am compelled to affirm I have seen performed. It is, as you say, “remarkable”; but still not miraculous. Your suggestion that Dr. Hammond should go and see it is a good one. Science would be the gainer, and your humble correspondent be justified. Are you, however, in a position to guarantee that he would furnish the world of skeptics with an example of “veracious reporting,” if his observation should tend to overthrow the pet theories of what we loosely call science?
Yours very respectfully,
New York, March 28th, 1877.
Levitation and Other Light Matters
...
Baron Palm`s Incineratiom
...
<... continues on page 4-54 >
Editor's notes