Blavatsky H.P. - Madame Blavatsky (4): Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Letter to the Editor of the “Indu Prakash” | | previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Letter to the Editor of the “Indu Prakash” | ||
| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Réponse Définitive d’une Théosophe à M. Rossi de Justiniani | | next = Blavatsky H.P. - Réponse Définitive d’une Théosophe à M. Rossi de Justiniani | ||
| alternatives = | | alternatives = | ||
| translations = | | translations = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
{{Style P-Title|MADAME BLAVATSKY}} | {{Style P-Title|MADAME BLAVATSKY}} | ||
{{HPB-CW-comment|view=center|[''The Spiritualist'', London, July 11, 1879, p. 24]}} | |||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
{{Style S-Small capitals|Sir}},—Be so kind as to make room in your next issue for this indignant protest of mine. Speaking of me in your leading article of May 23rd, and entitled “Theosophic Thaumaturgy,” I am mentioned as the “Countess” Blavatsky. Allow me to state, once for ever, that such is not my title, nor can I concede the right to include in the long list of vices I may be possibly endowed with that of a ''parvenu’s'' vanity. My family, on both sides, is quite ancient enough and noble enough to have transmitted to me too much pride to leave room for any petty feeling of vanity. I had to protest against this title while I was in America; have protested against it at another time in ''La Revue Spirite'' of Paris; and have just published in the ''Bombay Gazette'' of May 13th a third protest, stating that, for reasons sufficiently specified, and not wholly disconnected with American citizenship, my name is simply | |||
{{Style P-Signature|H. P. | {{Style P-Signature in capitals|H. P. Blavatsky}} | ||
Bombay, June 12th.}} | {{Style P-No indent|Bombay, June 12th.}} | ||
{{HPB-CW-comment|[The expression “Countess Blavatsky” was taken from the Indian newspapers. | {{HPB-CW-comment|[The expression “Countess Blavatsky” was taken from the Indian newspapers.—{{Style S-Small capitals|Ed}}.]}} | ||
Revision as of 13:45, 9 July 2025
Publications: The Spiritualist, London, July 11, 1879, p. 24
Also at:
In other languages:
55
MADAME BLAVATSKY
[The Spiritualist, London, July 11, 1879, p. 24]
Sir,—Be so kind as to make room in your next issue for this indignant protest of mine. Speaking of me in your leading article of May 23rd, and entitled “Theosophic Thaumaturgy,” I am mentioned as the “Countess” Blavatsky. Allow me to state, once for ever, that such is not my title, nor can I concede the right to include in the long list of vices I may be possibly endowed with that of a parvenu’s vanity. My family, on both sides, is quite ancient enough and noble enough to have transmitted to me too much pride to leave room for any petty feeling of vanity. I had to protest against this title while I was in America; have protested against it at another time in La Revue Spirite of Paris; and have just published in the Bombay Gazette of May 13th a third protest, stating that, for reasons sufficiently specified, and not wholly disconnected with American citizenship, my name is simply
Bombay, June 12th.
[The expression “Countess Blavatsky” was taken from the Indian newspapers.—Ed.]