Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
15,239
edits
HPB-SD(ed.1) v.2 p.1 st.2 sl.7 (view source)
Revision as of 01:14, 14 September 2025
, 14 September 2025no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
{{Page|61|what the gnostics say.}} | {{Page|61|what the gnostics say.}} | ||
{{Style P-No indent|''Zend-Avesta'', the ''Vendidad ''and others correct and expose the later cunning shuffling of the gods in the Hindu Pantheon, and restore through Ahura the ''Asuras ''to their legitimate place in theogony, so the recent discoveries of the Chaldean tablets vindicate the good name of the first divine Emanations. This is easily proved. Christian Angelology is directly and solely derived from that of the Pharisees, who brought their tenets from Babylonia. The Sadducees, the real guardians of the Laws of Moses, knew not of, and rejected, any angels, opposing even the immortality of the human ''Soul ''(not impersonal Spirit). In the Bible the only “ Angels ” spoken of are the “ Sons of God ” mentioned in Genesis vi. (who are now regarded as the ''Nephilim'', the Fallen Angels), and several angels in human form, the “ Messengers ” of the Jewish God, whose own rank needs a closer analysis than heretofore given. (''Vide Supra'', Stanza I., sub-sections 2, 3, ''et seq.'', where it is shown that the early Akkadians called ''Ea'', Wisdom, that which was disfigured by the later Chaldees and Semites into ''Tismat'', Tisalat and the Thallath of Berosus, the female Sea Dragon, now Satan.) Truly — “ How art thou fallen (by the hand of man), O bright star and son of the morning ” !}} | {{Style P-No indent|''Zend-Avesta'', the ''Vendidad ''and others correct and expose the later cunning shuffling of the gods in the Hindu Pantheon, and restore through {{Style S-Small capitals|Ahura}} the ''Asuras ''to their legitimate place in theogony, so the recent discoveries of the Chaldean tablets vindicate the good name of the first divine Emanations. This is easily proved. Christian Angelology is directly and solely derived from that of the Pharisees, who brought their tenets from Babylonia. The Sadducees, the real guardians of the Laws of Moses, knew not of, and rejected, any angels, opposing even the immortality of the human ''Soul ''(not impersonal Spirit). In the Bible the only “ Angels ” spoken of are the “ Sons of God ” mentioned in Genesis vi. (who are now regarded as the ''Nephilim'', the Fallen Angels), and several angels in human form, the “ Messengers ” of the Jewish God, whose own rank needs a closer analysis than heretofore given. (''Vide Supra'', Stanza I., sub-sections 2, 3, ''et seq.'', where it is shown that the early Akkadians called ''Ea'', Wisdom, that which was disfigured by the later Chaldees and Semites into ''Tismat'', Tisalat and the Thallath of Berosus, the female Sea Dragon, now Satan.) Truly — “ How art thou fallen (by the hand of man), O bright star and son of the morning ” !}} | ||
Now what do the Babylonian accounts of “ Creation,” as found on the Assyrian fragments of tiles, tell us ; those very accounts upon which the Pharisees built their angelology ? But compare Mr. G. Smith’s “ ''Assyrian Discoveries'',” p. 398, and his “ ''Chaldean Account of Genesis'',” p. 107. The “ ''Tablet with the story of the Seven Wicked Gods or Spirits'',” has the following account — we print the important passages in italics : — | Now what do the Babylonian accounts of “ Creation,” as found on the Assyrian fragments of tiles, tell us ; those very accounts upon which the Pharisees built their angelology ? But compare Mr. G. Smith’s “ ''Assyrian Discoveries'',” p. 398, and his “ ''Chaldean Account of Genesis'',” p. 107. The “ ''Tablet with the story of the Seven Wicked Gods or Spirits'',” has the following account — we print the important passages in italics : — | ||