− | ... | + | {{Style S-Small capitals|Sir}},—Will any of your correspondents, versed in astrology, favour me with a judgment on the following question of sickness? A female child, born on the 26th June, 1875, at 11.45 a.m., in London. Her nativity, cast by a well-known astrologer, shows no indication of early death. On the 8th December, 1877, at 8.16 p.m., I receive a letter from the mother of the child telling me that it has scarlet fever. Being a friend of the family, and having, moreover, an interest in the child’s life, the letter renders me really anxious on her behalf. So I take this time as one suitable for the question. On the 12th December, hearing that the child is worse, and, being requested to call, I go to the house, and, at 5.5 p.m., am taken into the sick room, when again I feel extremely anxious. I take this time for a second question. The illness has terminated, whether in death or recovery I do not now say, but will communicate the result to your readers if they are favoured with judgments with which they can compare it. |
| + | I drew the two figures myself, and both appeared to me, whether rightly or wrongly, as it turned out, I do not say, extremely menacing. Here, since horary astrology does not involve the complex calculations of a nativity, is a simple test, which I hope it may not be considered too troublesome to respond to by those who are willing to advance their favourite study in public estimation. |
| + | london_spiritualist_n.283_1878-01-25.pdf|page=12|London Spiritualist, No. 283, January 25, 1878, pp. 38-40 |