HPB-SB-1-19: Difference between revisions

m
improved
No edit summary
m (improved)
Line 10: Line 10:
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued|The London Katie King.}}
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued|The London Katie King.}}


flower. Instinctively she put her hand up to protect it, and caught the hand of Hipp. He had been sitting opposite to her, and was then {{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|standing up and leaning over the table. To screen himself he at once seized Miss Cook's hand, and called for a light, when, sure enough, he was seen holding her by the hand.}}<ref>{{Style S-HPB SB. Editors note|The rest of the article is not present in HPB Scrapbook and copied from ''Banner of Light'', January 20, 1875. P. 4.}}<br>
flower. Instinctively she put her hand up to protect it, and caught the hand of Hipp. He had been sitting opposite to her, and was then {{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|standing up and leaning over the table. To screen himself he at once seized Miss Cook's hand, and called for a light, when, sure enough, he was seen holding her by the hand.}}


From what all the other sitters told me of his conduct all through the séance, I should not believe any representation of his prejudicial to the truthfulness of Miss Cook, even if I had not heard her own version of the affair, and although she was an interested party. I have the most entire faith, derived from long experience, in her sincerity and honesty. I enclose a letter cut from the Spiritualist of Jan. 16, 1874, written by a gentleman who was present. It does not differ materially from the account Miss Cook gave me, and which I have told you.” The letter referred to is that by Mr. Blyton, given above.<br>
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|...}}<ref>{{Style S-HPB SB. Editors note|The rest of the article is not present in HPB Scrapbook and copied from ''Banner of Light'', January 20, 1875. P. 4.}}</ref>


Here our readers have all the grounds for the story so eagerly copied into the American newspapers in the hope of damaging Spiritualsm. The affair took place before the wonderful materializations through Miss Cook were heard of, and has no bearing on those well-tested phenomena. It rests on the mere capricious assumption of one individual, and that assumption is contradicted by Mr. Blyton and other persons present at the séances. Mr. Crookes, whose opportunities of testing the good faith of Miss Cook have been ample, has seen no cause yet to doubt her truthfulness. On the contrary he bears witness to it in the fullest and most emphatic manner, and has re-confirmed it recently by many remarkable tests.<br>
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|H.P.B. <u>versus</u> D.H.J. Child #}}
 
 
From what all the other sitters told me of his conduct all through the séance, I should not believe any representation of his prejudicial to the truthfulness of Miss Cook, even if I had not heard her own version of the affair, and although she was an interested party. I have the most entire faith, derived from long experience, in her sincerity and honesty. I enclose a letter cut from the Spiritualist of Jan. 16, 1874, written by a gentleman who was present. It does not differ materially from the account Miss Cook gave me, and which I have told you.” The letter referred to is that by Mr. Blyton, given above.
 
Here our readers have all the grounds for the story so eagerly copied into the American newspapers in the hope of damaging Spiritualsm. The affair took place before the wonderful materializations through Miss Cook were heard of, and has no bearing on those well-tested phenomena. It rests on the mere capricious assumption of one individual, and that assumption is contradicted by Mr. Blyton and other persons present at the séances. Mr. Crookes, whose opportunities of testing the good faith of Miss Cook have been ample, has seen no cause yet to doubt her truthfulness. On the contrary he bears witness to it in the fullest and most emphatic manner, and has re-confirmed it recently by many remarkable tests.


Of the thousand and one American newspapers that have published Mr. Hipp’s slanderous statement, impugning the integrity of Miss Cook as a medium, how many will have the candor to inform their readers that there is another side to the story? Who speaks first?
Of the thousand and one American newspapers that have published Mr. Hipp’s slanderous statement, impugning the integrity of Miss Cook as a medium, how many will have the candor to inform their readers that there is another side to the story? Who speaks first?
</ref>


{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|H.P.B.-{{Style S-Double underline|versus}} D.H.J. Child #}}


{{HPB-SB-item
{{HPB-SB-item
Line 27: Line 30:
  | type = article
  | type = article
  | status = proofread
  | status = proofread
  | continues = 20,21
  | continues = 20, 21
  | author = Blavatsky, H. P.
  | author = Blavatsky, H. P.
  | title = The Philadelphia “Fiasco,” or Who is Who?
  | title = The Philadelphia “Fiasco,” or Who is Who?
Line 33: Line 36:
  | untitled =  
  | untitled =  
  | source title = Banner of Light, The
  | source title = Banner of Light, The
  | source details = vol. XXXVI, pp. 2-3
  | source details = Boston, Saturday, January 30, 1875, vol. XXXVI, pp. 2-3
  | publication date = 1875-01-30
  | publication date = 1875-01-30
  | original date =  
  | original date =