Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
17,091
edits
(Комментарий к шлоке 2 станцы I тома II третьей редакции «Тайной доктрины») |
(незначительные правки) |
||
| Line 256: | Line 256: | ||
{{Style P-Quote|{{Style P-No indent|and the Rabbi, in commenting upon them, says: “It teaches the ''Alhim''-ness (31415) and ''One''-ness (the diameter to Alhim), through Words (DBRIM = 41224), by which on the one side there is infinite expression in heterogeneous creations, and on the other a final harmonic tendency to ''One''-ness” (which, as everyone knows, is the mathematical function of ''pi'' of the schools, which measures, weighs, and numbers the stars of heaven, and yet resolves them back into the final oneness of the Uni-verse) “through Words. Their final accord perfects itself in that ''One''-ness that ordains them, and which consists in}}}} | {{Style P-Quote|{{Style P-No indent|and the Rabbi, in commenting upon them, says: “It teaches the ''Alhim''-ness (31415) and ''One''-ness (the diameter to Alhim), through Words (DBRIM = 41224), by which on the one side there is infinite expression in heterogeneous creations, and on the other a final harmonic tendency to ''One''-ness” (which, as everyone knows, is the mathematical function of ''pi'' of the schools, which measures, weighs, and numbers the stars of heaven, and yet resolves them back into the final oneness of the Uni-verse) “through Words. Their final accord perfects itself in that ''One''-ness that ordains them, and which consists in}}}} | ||
{{Style P-Quote|<center>{{Style S-Hebrew|ספר ספר ספור}} ”</center>}} | {{Style P-Quote|<center>{{Style S-Hebrew|ספר ספר ספור}}”</center>}} | ||
{{Style P-Quote|{{Style P-No indent|that is, the Rabbi, in his first comment, leaves the ''jod'', or ''i'', out of one of the words, whereas afterwards he restores it again. If we take the values of those subordinate}}}} | {{Style P-Quote|{{Style P-No indent|that is, the Rabbi, in his first comment, leaves the ''jod'', or ''i'', out of one of the words, whereas afterwards he restores it again. If we take the values of those subordinate}}}} | ||