Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
585 bytes added ,  02:01, 12 July 2021
no edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:  
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued|The London Katie King.}}
 
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued|The London Katie King.}}
   −
flower. Instinctively she put her hand up to protect it, and caught the hand of Hipp. He had been sitting opposite to her, and was then {{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|standing up and leaning over the table. To screen himself he at once seized Miss Cook's hand, and called for a light, when, sure enough, he was seen holding her by the hand.}}<ref>{{Style S-HPB SB. Editors note|The rest of the article is not present in HPB Scrapbook and copied from ''Banner of Light'', January 20, 1875. P. 4.}}<br>
+
flower. Instinctively she put her hand up to protect it, and caught the hand of Hipp. He had been sitting opposite to her, and was then {{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|standing up and leaning over the table. To screen himself he at once seized Miss Cook's hand, and called for a light, when, sure enough, he was seen holding her by the hand.}}
   −
From what all the other sitters told me of his conduct all through the séance, I should not believe any representation of his prejudicial to the truthfulness of Miss Cook, even if I had not heard her own version of the affair, and although she was an interested party. I have the most entire faith, derived from long experience, in her sincerity and honesty. I enclose a letter cut from the Spiritualist of Jan. 16, 1874, written by a gentleman who was present. It does not differ materially from the account Miss Cook gave me, and which I have told you.” The letter referred to is that by Mr. Blyton, given above.<br>
+
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|...}}<ref>{{Style S-HPB SB. Editors note|The rest of the article is not present in HPB Scrapbook and copied from ''Banner of Light'', January 20, 1875. P. 4.}}</ref>
   −
Here our readers have all the grounds for the story so eagerly copied into the American newspapers in the hope of damaging Spiritualsm. The affair took place before the wonderful materializations through Miss Cook were heard of, and has no bearing on those well-tested phenomena. It rests on the mere capricious assumption of one individual, and that assumption is contradicted by Mr. Blyton and other persons present at the séances. Mr. Crookes, whose opportunities of testing the good faith of Miss Cook have been ample, has seen no cause yet to doubt her truthfulness. On the contrary he bears witness to it in the fullest and most emphatic manner, and has re-confirmed it recently by many remarkable tests.<br>
+
 
 +
From what all the other sitters told me of his conduct all through the séance, I should not believe any representation of his prejudicial to the truthfulness of Miss Cook, even if I had not heard her own version of the affair, and although she was an interested party. I have the most entire faith, derived from long experience, in her sincerity and honesty. I enclose a letter cut from the Spiritualist of Jan. 16, 1874, written by a gentleman who was present. It does not differ materially from the account Miss Cook gave me, and which I have told you.” The letter referred to is that by Mr. Blyton, given above.
 +
 
 +
Here our readers have all the grounds for the story so eagerly copied into the American newspapers in the hope of damaging Spiritualsm. The affair took place before the wonderful materializations through Miss Cook were heard of, and has no bearing on those well-tested phenomena. It rests on the mere capricious assumption of one individual, and that assumption is contradicted by Mr. Blyton and other persons present at the séances. Mr. Crookes, whose opportunities of testing the good faith of Miss Cook have been ample, has seen no cause yet to doubt her truthfulness. On the contrary he bears witness to it in the fullest and most emphatic manner, and has re-confirmed it recently by many remarkable tests.
    
Of the thousand and one American newspapers that have published Mr. Hipp’s slanderous statement, impugning the integrity of Miss Cook as a medium, how many will have the candor to inform their readers that there is another side to the story? Who speaks first?
 
Of the thousand and one American newspapers that have published Mr. Hipp’s slanderous statement, impugning the integrity of Miss Cook as a medium, how many will have the candor to inform their readers that there is another side to the story? Who speaks first?
</ref>
     −
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|H.P.B.-{{Style S-Double underline|versus}} D.H.J. Child #}}
+
{{Style P-HPB SB. Article separator}}
    +
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|H.P.B. <u>versus</u> D.H.J. Child<ref>{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|Child was <u>a confederate</u>. He took money {{Style S-HPB SB. Lost|...lmes’}} séance. He is a {{Style S-HPB SB. Lost|...}}*.}}<br>
 +
{{Style S-HPB SB. Editors note|<nowiki>*</nowiki> The last word may be rascal. — B. Zirkoff}}</ref>|center}}
   −
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title|The Philadelphia “Fiasco,” or Who is Who?}}
+
{{HPB-SB-item
 
+
| volume = 1
{{Style S-HPB SB. Archivist note|Published in "A Modern Panarion", p.15 ...}}
+
| page = 19
 +
| item = 1
 +
| type = article
 +
| status = proofread
 +
| continues = 20, 21
 +
| author = Blavatsky, H. P.
 +
| title = The Philadelphia “Fiasco,” or Who is Who?
 +
| subtitle =
 +
| untitled =
 +
| source title = Banner of Light, The
 +
| source details = Boston, Saturday, January 30, 1875, vol. XXXVI, pp. 2-3
 +
| publication date = 1875-01-30
 +
| original date =
 +
| notes = Also in  HPB CW, vol. I, pp. 56-72
 +
| categories =
 +
}}
 +
{{Style S-HPB SB. Archivist note|Published in "A Modern Panarion", p.15[-27] {{Style S-HPB SB. Lost|...}}|center}}
    
A few weeks ago, in a letter, extracts from which have appeared in the Spiritual Scientist of December 3rd, I alluded to the deplorable lack of accord between American Spiritualists, and the consequences of the same. At that time I had just fought out my useless battle with a foe who, though beneath my own personal notice, had insulted all the Spiritualists of this country, as a body, in a caricature of a so-called scientific ''exposé''. In dealing with {{Style S-HPB SB. HPB underlined|him}} I dealt but with one of the numerous “bravos” enlisted in the army of the bitter opponents of our belief, and my task was, comparatively speaking, an easy one, if we take it for granted that falsehood can hardly withstand truth, as the latter will ever speak for itself. Since that day the scales have turned; prompted now as then, by the same love of justice and fair play, I feel compelled to throw [down] my glove once more in our defence, seeing that so few of the adherents to our cause are bold enough to accept that duty, and so many of them show the white feather of pusillanimity.
 
A few weeks ago, in a letter, extracts from which have appeared in the Spiritual Scientist of December 3rd, I alluded to the deplorable lack of accord between American Spiritualists, and the consequences of the same. At that time I had just fought out my useless battle with a foe who, though beneath my own personal notice, had insulted all the Spiritualists of this country, as a body, in a caricature of a so-called scientific ''exposé''. In dealing with {{Style S-HPB SB. HPB underlined|him}} I dealt but with one of the numerous “bravos” enlisted in the army of the bitter opponents of our belief, and my task was, comparatively speaking, an easy one, if we take it for granted that falsehood can hardly withstand truth, as the latter will ever speak for itself. Since that day the scales have turned; prompted now as then, by the same love of justice and fair play, I feel compelled to throw [down] my glove once more in our defence, seeing that so few of the adherents to our cause are bold enough to accept that duty, and so many of them show the white feather of pusillanimity.
Line 63: Line 83:     
As I am unwilling to base my argument upon any other testimony than my own, I will not dwell upon the alleged apparition of Katie King at the Holmeses’ on the 5th of December, to Mr. Roberts and fifteen others, among whom was Mr. W. H. Clarke, a reporter for The Daily Graphic, for I happened to be out of town, though, if this {{Style S-HPB SB. Continued on|}}
 
As I am unwilling to base my argument upon any other testimony than my own, I will not dwell upon the alleged apparition of Katie King at the Holmeses’ on the 5th of December, to Mr. Roberts and fifteen others, among whom was Mr. W. H. Clarke, a reporter for The Daily Graphic, for I happened to be out of town, though, if this {{Style S-HPB SB. Continued on|}}
  −
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|Child was {{Style S-Underline|a confederate}}. He took money… lmes’ séance. He is a ra..l.}}
  −
      
{{Footnotes}}
 
{{Footnotes}}
[[Category:To be proofread]]
 

Navigation menu