HPB-SD(ed.1) v.2 p.1 st.8 sl.28

From Teopedia library
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Secret Doctrine
The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky
Verbatim first edition
volume 2 Anthropogenesis, part 1 Anthropogenesis, stanza 8 Evolution of the Animal Mammalians. The First Fall, sloka 28 How the first mammals were produced
<<     >>
ed.1rus


180
the secret doctrine.
180


STANZA VIII.
EVOLUTION OF THE ANIMAL MAMMALIANS. —  THE FIRST FALL.
–––––––

§§ (28) How the first mammals were produced. (29) A quasi-Darwinian Evolution. (30) The animals get solid bodies. (31) Their separation into sexes. (32) The first sin of the mindless men.

––––––––––––––
28. From the drops of sweat (a) ; from the residue of the substance ; matter from dead bodies and animals of the wheel beforeprevious, Third Round) ; and from cast-off dust ; the first animals (of this Round) were produced.

(a) The Occult doctrine maintains that, in this Round, the mammalians were a later work of evolution than man. Evolution proceeds in cycles. The great Manvantaric cycle of Seven Rounds, beginning in the First Round with mineral, vegetable, and animal, brings its evolutionary work on the descending arc to a dead stop in the middle of the Fourth Race, at the close of the first half of the Fourth Round. It is on our Earth, then, (the Fourth sphere and the lowest) and in the present Round, that this middle point has been reached. And since the Monad has passed, after its “ first inmetallization ” on Globe A, through the mineral, vegetable, and animal worlds in every degree of the three states of matter, except the last degree of the third or solid state, which it reached only at the “ mid-point of evolution,” it is but logical and natural that at the beginning of the Fourth Round on Globe D, Man should be the first to appear ; and also that his frame should be of the most tenuous matter that is compatible with objectivity. To make it still clearer : if the Monad begins its cycle of incarnations through the three objective kingdoms on the descending curved line, it has necessarily to enter on the re-ascending curved line of the sphere as a man also. On the descending arc it is the spiritual which is gradually transformed into the material. On the middle line of the base, Spirit and Matter are equilibrized in Man. On the ascending arc, Spirit is slowly re-asserting itself at the expense of the physical, or matter, so that, at the close of the seventh Race of the Seventh Round, the Monad will find itself as


181
men, the progenitors of animals.
181


free from matter and all its qualities as it was in the beginning ; having gained in addition the experience and wisdom, the fruition of all its personal lives, without their evil and temptations.

This order of evolution is found also in Genesis (ch. 1 and 2) if one reads it in its true esoteric sense, for chapter i. contains the history of the first Three Rounds, as well as that of the first Three Races of the Fourth, up to that moment when Man is called to conscious life by the Elohim of Wisdom. In the first chapter, animals, whales and fowls of the air, are created before the androgyne Adam. * In the second, Adam (the sexless) comes first, and the animals only appear after him. Even the state of mental torpor and unconsciousness of the first two races, and of the first half of the Third Race, is symbolized, in the second chapter of Genesis, by the deep sleep of Adam. It was the dreamless sleep of mental inaction, the slumber of the Soul and Mind, which was meant by that “ sleep,” and not at all the physiological process of differentiation of sexes, as a learned French theorist (M. Naudin) imagined.

The Purânas, the Chaldean and Egyptian fragments, and also the Chinese traditions, all show an agreement with the Secret Doctrine as to the process and order of evolution. We find in them the corroboration of almost all our teaching. For instance : the statement concerning the oviparous mode of procreation of the Third Race, and even a hint at a less innocent mode of the procreation of the first mammal forms, “ gigantic, transparent, dumb and monstrous they were,” says the Commentary. Study the stories of the several Rishis and their multifarious progeny ; e.g., Pulastya is the father of all the Serpents and Nagas — the oviparous brood ; Kasyapa was grandsire, through his wife Tamra, of the birds and of Garuda, king of the feathered tribe ; while by his wife Surabhi, he was the parent of cows and buffaloes, etc., etc. In the Secret Doctrine, the first Nagas — beings wiser than Serpents —  are the “ Sons of Will and Yoga,” born before the complete separation of the sexes, “ matured in the man-bearing eggs † produced by the power (Kriyasakti) of the holy sages ” of the early Third Race. ‡

* An allegorical reference to the “ Sacred Animals ” of the Zodiac and other heavenly bodies. Some Kabalists see in them the prototypes of the animals.

† In “ Hesiod,” Zeus creates his third race of men out of ash-trees. In the “ Popol Vuh ” the Third Race of men is created out of the tree Tzita and the marrow of the reed called Sibac. But Sibac means “ egg ” in the mystery language of the Artufas (or Initiation caves). In a report sent in 1812 to the Cortes by Don Baptista Pino it is said : “ All the Pueblos have their Artufas — so the natives call subterranean rooms with only a single door where they (secretly) assemble. . . . . These are impenetrable temples . . . . and the doors are always closed to the Spaniards. . . . . They adore the Sun and Moon . . . . fire and the great snake (the creative power), whose eggs are called Sibac.

‡ There is a notable difference esoterically between the words Sarpa and Naga, though


182
the secret doctrine.
182


“ . . . . . In these were incarnated the Lords of the three (upper) worlds, “ the various classes of Rudras, who had been Tushitas, who had been Jayas, who are Adityas ; ” for, as explained by Parâsara, “ There are a hundred appellations of the immeasurably mighty Rudras.”

Some of the descendants of the primitive Nagas, the Serpents of Wisdom, peopled America, when its continent arose during the palmy days of the great Atlantis, (America being the Pâtâla or Antipodes of Jambu-Dwipa, not of Bharata-Varsha). Otherwise, whence the traditions and legends — the latter always more true than history, as says Augustin Thierry — and even the identity in the names of certain “ medicine men ” and priests, who exist to this day in Mexico ? We shall have to say something of the Nargals and the Nagals and also of Nagalism, called “ devil-worship ” by the Missionaries.

In almost all the Purânas, the story of the “ Sacrifice of Daksha ” is given, the oldest account of which is to be found in Vayu Purâna. Allegorical as it is, there is more meaning and biological revelation in it to a Naturalist, than in all the pseudo-scientific vagaries, which are regarded as learned theories and hypotheses.

Daksha, who is regarded as the Chief Progenitor, is, moreover, pointed out as the creator of physical man in the “ fable,” which makes him lose his head from his body in the general strife between the gods and the Raumas. This head, being burnt in the fire, is replaced by the head of a ram (Kasi-Khanda). Now the ram’s head and horns are ever the symbol of generating power and of reproductive force, and are phallic. As we have shown, it is Daksha who establishes the era of men engendered by sexual intercourse. But this mode of procreation did not occur suddenly, as one may think, and required long ages before it became the one “ natural ” way. Therefore, his sacrifice to the gods is shown as interfered with by Siva, the destroying deity, evolution and progress personified, who is the regenerator at the same time ; who destroys things under one form but to recall them to life under another more perfect type. Siva-Rudra creates the terrible Virabhadra (born of his breath) the “ thousand-headed, thousand-armed ” (etc.) monster, and commissions him to destroy the sacrifice prepared by Daksha. Then Virabhadra, “ abiding in the region of the ghosts (ethereal men) . . . .

they are both used indiscriminately. Sarpa (serpent) is from the root Srip, serpo to creep ; and they are called “ Ahi,” from Ha, to abandon. “ The sarpa was produced from Brahmâ’s hair, which, owing to his fright at beholding the Yakshas, whom he had created horrible to behold, fell off from the head, each hair becoming a serpent. They are called Sarpa from their creeping and Ahi because they had deserted the head ” (Wilson). But the Nagas, their serpent’s tail notwithstanding, do not creep, but manage to walk, run and fight in the allegories.


183
archaic astrology.
183


created from the pores of the skin (Romakupas), powerful Raumas, * (or Raumyas).” Now, however mythical the allegory, the Mahabhârata, which is history as much as is the Iliad, shows † the Raumyas and other races, as springing in the same manner from the Romakupas, hair or skin pores. This allegorical description of the “ sacrifice ” is full of significance to the students of the Secret Doctrine who know of the “ Sweat-born.”

In the Vayu Purâna’s account of Daksha’s sacrifice, moreover, it is said to have taken place in the presence of creatures born from the egg, from the vapour, vegetation, pores of the skin, and, finally only, from the womb.

Daksha typifies the early Third Race, holy and pure, still devoid of an individual Ego, and having merely the passive capacities. Brahmâ, therefore, commands him to create (in the exoteric texts) ; when, obeying the command, he made “ inferior and superior ” (avara and vara) progeny (putra), bipeds and quadrupeds ; and by his will, gave birth to females . . . . to the gods, the Daityas (giants of the Fourth Race), the snake-gods, animals, cattle and the Danavas (Titans and demon Magicians) and other beings.”

. . . . “ From that period forward, living creatures were engendered by sexual intercourse. Before the time of Daksha, they were variously propagated —  by the will, by sight, by touch, and by Yoga-power.” ‡ And now comes the simply zoological teaching.

* Wilson translates the word as “ demigods ” (See his Vishnu Purâna, p. 130) ; but Raumas or Raumyas are simply a race, a tribe.

† xii. 10308.

‡ “ Vishnu Purâna.”