Changes

2,274 bytes added ,  16:51, 24 October 2023
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
{{HPB-SB-header
 
{{HPB-SB-header
 
  | volume = 3
 
  | volume = 3
  | page =143
+
  | page = 143
 
  | image = SB-03-143.jpg
 
  | image = SB-03-143.jpg
 
  | notes =
 
  | notes =
Line 8: Line 8:  
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued |The Ring of Science|3-142}}
 
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued |The Ring of Science|3-142}}
   −
...
+
ately noticed, at page 384, Vol VII No 39 of Pop. Science Monthly. Prof. E. B. Elliott will show that he was right and Prof. H. E. Davis wrong in the number of young ''Lepidoptera ''which, when placed end to end, will measure a mile, —the true figures being 0174 X b— Y54<sup>2</sup> 1 2 =  A’ss.
 +
 
 +
The Anthropological subsection will no doubt give prominence to a discussion upon Measles as a Religious Element among the Andamanese; and an adjournment could hardly be reached without a fight over the old puzzle, whether it is probable that the American stovepipe represents the form of the prayer-cylinder of the Lacustrians. If Professor Buchanan, who has forgotten more about Anthropology than any of them ever knew, should attempt to crowd upon them the complete study of Man in all his relations, he will be coughed down and the floor granted to somebody who has a speech ready upon the reticulated button-hole of the Bergalese rajpoot's coat. And yet they are not happy.
 +
 
 +
Have we done any injustice to the American and British Association—for they are both alike. Consult the printed volumes of Transactions, in which may be found record of some of the very papers above enumerated, and others about orange-peel oil, fat women, hyena's dens and the blastoderms of birds’ eggs. If these learned children (for what are they else, who play with such toys?) would simply confess their ignorance of spiritual facts, laws and philosophy, we would have nothing to complain of. It is their own affair whether they study this or that science, and prefer to use the few hours they have on earth in discovering the nature of the respiratory organs of the shark or any other, ignoble tomfoolery, to studying the spiritual part of Man and his inter-mundane communications, attractions and perils. But what the whole Spiritualistic press and all intelligent Spiritualists so indignantly denounce, is the fact that scientific men like Davy, Faraday, Tyndall and Huxley pronounce upon these matters without being possessed of any data upon which to form an opinion. Worse, they sometimes have deliberately lied about observed phenomena, to avoid making a favorable report. If any of them feels aggrieved at our language, let him say so, and we will prove its literal accuracy.