Changes

Blavatsky H.P. - Isis Unveiled (view source)

Revision as of 07:47, 10 March 2024

38,261 bytes added , 10 March

no edit summary

Line 279: Line 279:

The idea that “numbers” possessing the greatest virtue, produce always what is good and never what is evil, refers to justice, equanimity of temper, and everything that is harmonious. When the author speaks of every star as an individual soul, he only means what the Hindu initiates and the Hermetists taught before and after him, viz.: that every star is an independent planet, which, like our earth, has a soul of its own, every atom of matter being impregnated with the divine influx of the soul of the world. It breathes and lives; it feels and suffers as well as enjoys life in its way. What naturalist is prepared to dispute it on good evidence? Therefore, we must consider the celestial bodies as the images of gods; as partaking of the divine powers in their substance; and though they are not immortal in their soul-entity, their agency in the economy of the universe is entitled to divine honors, such as we pay to minor gods. The idea is plain, and one must be malevolent indeed to misrepresent it. If the author of {{Style S-Italic|Epinomis}} places these fiery gods higher than the animals, plants, and even mankind, all of which, as earthly creatures, are assigned by him

+

{{Footnote return|*|fn27}} “Plato und die Alt. Akademie.”

{{Footnote return|†|fn28}} One of the five solid figures in Geometry.

+

Line 462: Line 464:

{{Footnote return|†|fn39}} Taley means ocean or sea.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Kabalist}}, from {{Style S-Hebrew|קבלה}}, Kabala; an unwritten or oral tradition. The kabalist is a student of “secret science,” one who interprets the hidden meaning of the Scriptures with the help of the symbolical {{Style S-Italic|Kabala,}} and explains the real one by these means. The Tanaim were the first kabalists among the Jews; they appeared at Jerusalem about the beginning of the third century before the Christian era. The Books of {{Style S-Italic|Ezekiel, Daniel, Henoch,}} and the {{Style S-Italic|Revelation}} of St. John, are purely kabalistical. This secret doctrine is identical with that of the Chaldeans, and includes at the same time much of the Persian wisdom, or “magic.”

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Lamas}}.—Buddhist monks belonging to the Lamaic religion of Thibet, as, for instance, friars are the monks belonging to the Popish or Roman Catholic religion. Every lama is subject to the grand Taley-Lama, the Buddhist pope of Thibet, who holds his residence at Lha-ssa, and is a reincarnation of Buddha.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Mage}}, or {{Style S-Italic|Magian;}} from {{Style S-Italic|Mag}} or {{Style S-Italic|Maha.}} The word is the root of the word magician. The Maha-âtma (the great Soul or Spirit) in India had its priests in the pre-Vedic times. The Magians were priests of the fire-god; we find them among the Assyrians and Babylonians, as well as among the Persian fire-worshippers. The three magi, also denominated kings, that are said to have made gifts of gold, incense, and myrrh to the infant Jesus, were fire-worshippers like the rest, and astrologers; for they saw his star. The high priest of the Parsis, at Surat, is called {{Style S-Italic|Mobed,}} others derived the word from Megh; Meh-ab signifying something grand and noble. Zoroaster’s disciples were called {{Style S-Italic|Meghestom,}} according to Kleuker.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Magician}}.—This term, once a title of renown and distinction, has come to be wholly perverted from its true meaning. Once the synonym of all that was honorable and reverent, of a possessor of learning and wisdom, it has become degraded into an epithet to designate one who is a pretender and a juggler; a charlatan, in short, or one who has “sold his soul to the Evil One”; who misuses his knowledge, and employs it for low and dangerous uses, according to the teachings of the clergy, and a mass of superstitious fools who believe the magician a sorcerer and an enchanter. But Christians forget, apparently, that Moses was also a magician, and Daniel, “{{Style S-Italic|Master}} of the magicians, astrologers, Chaldeans, and soothsayers” ({{Style S-Italic|Daniel,}} v. II).

+

The word magician then, scientifically speaking, is derived from {{Style S-Italic|Magh, Mah,}} Hindu or {{Style S-Italic|Sanscrit}} Maha—great; a man well versed in the secret or esoteric knowledge; properly a Sacerdote.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Manticism}}, or mantic frenzy. During this state was developed the gift of prophecy. The two words are nearly synonymous. One was as honored as the other. Pythagoras and Plato held it in high esteem, and Socrates

+

{{Style P-No indent|advised his disciples to study Manticism. The Church Fathers, who condemned so severely the {{Style S-Italic|mantic frenzy}} in Pagan priests and Pythiæ, were not above applying it to their own uses. The Montanists, who took their name from Montanus, a bishop of Phrygia, who was considered divinely inspired, rivalled with the {{Style S-Italic|manteis}} or prophets. “Tertullian, Augustine, and the martyrs of Carthage, were of the number,” says the author of {{Style S-Italic|Prophecy, Ancient and Modern.}} “The Montanists seem to have resembled the {{Style S-Italic|Bacchantes}} in the wild enthusiasm that characterized their orgies,” he adds. There is a diversity of opinion as to the origin of the word {{Style S-Italic|Manticism.}} There was the famous Mantis the Seer, in the days of Melampus and Prœtus, King of Argos; and there was Manto, the daughter of the prophet of Thebes, herself a prophetess. Cicero describes prophecy and mantic frenzy by saying that “in the inner recesses of the mind is divine prophecy hidden and confined, a divine impulse, which when it burns more vividly is called furor” (frenzy, madness).}}

+

But there is still another etymology possible for the word {{Style S-Italic|mantis,}} and to which we doubt if the attention of the philologists was ever drawn. The mantic frenzy may, perchance, have a still earlier origin. The two sacrificial cups of the Soma-mystery used during the religious rites, and generally known as grahas, are respectively called {{Style S-Italic|Sukra}} and {{Style S-Italic|Manti}}.{{Footnote mark|*|fn40}}

+

It is in the latter manti or manthi cup that Brahma is said to be “stirred up.” While the initiate drinks (albeit sparingly) of this sacred soma-juice, the Brahma, or rather his “spirit,” personified by the god Soma, enters into the man and takes {{Style S-Italic|possession}} of him. Hence, ecstatic vision, clairvoyance, and the gift of prophecy. Both kinds of divination—the natural and the artificial—are aroused by the Soma. The {{Style S-Italic|Sukra-}}cup awakens that which is given to every man by nature. It unites both spirit and soul, and these, from their own nature and essence, which are divine, have a foreknowledge of future things, as dreams, unexpected visions, and presentiments, well prove. The contents of the other cup, the manti, which “stirs the Brahma,” put thereby the soul in communication not only with the minor gods—the well-informed but not omniscient spirits—but actually with the highest divine essence itself. The soul receives a direct illumination from the presence of its “god;” but as it is not allowed to remember certain things, well known only in heaven, the initiated person is generally seized with a kind of sacred frenzy, and upon recovering from it, only remembers that which is allowed to him. As to the other kind of seers and diviners—those who make a

+

{{Footnote return|*|fn40}} See “Aytareya Brahmanan,” 3, I.

+

{{Style P-No indent|profession of and a living by it—they are usually held to be possessed by a {{Style S-Italic|gandharva,}} a deity which is nowhere so little honored as in India.}}

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Mantra}}.—A {{Style S-Italic|Sanskrit}} word conveying the same idea as the “Ineffable Name.” Some mantras, when pronounced according to magical formula taught in the {{Style S-Italic|Atharva-Veda,}} produce an instantaneous and wonderful effect. In its general sense, though, a mantra is either simply a prayer to the gods and powers of heaven, as taught by the Brahmanical books, and especially Manu, or else a magical charm. In its esoteric sense, the “word” of the mantra, or mystic speech, is called by the Brahmans {{Style S-Italic|Vâch.}} It resides in the mantra, which literally means those parts of the sacred books which are considered as the {{Style S-Italic|Sruti,}} or direct divine revelation.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Marabut}}.—A Mahometan pilgrim who has been to Mekka; a saint, after whose death his body is placed in an open sepulchre built on the surface, like other buildings, but in the middle of the streets and public places of populated cities. Placed inside the small and only room of the tomb (and several such public sarcophagi of brick and mortar may be seen to this day in the streets and squares of Cairo), the devotion of the wayfarers keeps a lamp ever burning at his head. The tombs of some of these marabuts have a great fame for the miracles they are alleged to perform.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Materialization}}.—A word employed by spiritualists to indicate the phenomenon of “a spirit clothing himself with a material form.” The far less objectionable term, “form-manifestation,” has been recently suggested by Mr. Stainton-Moses, of London. When the real nature of these apparitions is better comprehended, a still more appropriate name will doubtless be adopted. To call them materialized spirits is inadmissible, for they are not spirits but animated portrait-statues.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Mazdeans}}, from (Ahura) Mazda. (See Spiegel’s {{Style S-Italic|Yasna,}} xl.) They were the ancient Persian nobles who worshipped Ormazd, and, rejecting images, inspired the Jews with the same horror for every concrete representation of the Deity. “They seem in Herodotus’s time to have been superseded by the Magian religionists. The Parsis and Ghebers {{Style S-Italic|geberim,}} mighty men, of {{Style S-Italic|Genesis}} vi. and x. 8) appear to be Magian religionists. . . . By a curious muddling of ideas, Zoro-Aster ({{Style S-Italic|Zero}}, a circle, a son or priest, Aster, Ishtar, or Astarte—in Aryan dialect, a star), the title of the head of the Magians and fire-worshippers, or Surya-ishtara, the sun-worshipper, is often confounded in modern times with Zara-tustra, the reputed Mazdean apostle” (Zoroaster).

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Metempsychosis}}.—The progress of the soul from one stage of existence to another. Symbolized and vulgarly believed to be rebirths in animal bodies. A term generally misunderstood by every class of European and

+

{{Style P-No indent|American society, including many scientists. The kabalistic axiom, “A stone becomes a plant, a plant an animal, an animal a man, a man a spirit, and a spirit a god,” receives an explanation in Manu’s {{Style S-Italic|Manava-Dharma-Sastra,}} and other Brahmanical books.}}

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Mysteries}}.—Greek {{Style S-Italic|teletai,}} or finishings, as analogous to {{Style S-Italic|teleuteia}} or death. They were observances, generally kept secret from the profane and uninitiated, in which were taught by dramatic representation and other methods, the origin of things, the nature of the human spirit, its relations to the body, and the method of its purification and restoration to higher life. Physical science, medicine, the laws of music, divination, were all taught in the same manner. The Hippocratic oath was but a mystic obligation. Hippocrates was a priest of Asklepios, some of whose writings chanced to become public. But the Asklepiades were initiates of the Æsculapian serpent-worship, as the Bacchantes were of the Dionysia; and both rites were eventually incorporated with the Eleusinia. We will treat of the Mysteries fully in the subsequent chapters.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Mystics}}.—Those initiated. But in the mediæval and later periods the term was applied to men like Bœhmén the Theosophist, Molinos the Quietist, Nicholas of Basle, and others who believed in a direct interior communion with God, analogous to the inspiration of the prophets.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Nabia}}.—Seership, soothsaying. This oldest and most respected of mystic phenomena, is the name given to prophecy in the {{Style S-Italic|Bible,}} and is correctly included among the spiritual powers, such as divination, clairvoyant visions, trance-conditions, and oracles. But while enchanters, diviners, and even astrologers are strictly condemned in the Mosaic books, prophecy, seership, and nabia appear as the special gifts of heaven. In early ages they were all termed {{Style S-Italic|Epoptai,}} the Greek word for seers, clairvoyants; after which they were designated as {{Style S-Italic|Nebim,}} “the plural of Nebo, the Babylonian god of wisdom.” The kabalist distinguishes between the {{Style S-Italic|seer}} and the {{Style S-Italic|magician;}} one is passive, the other active; {{Style S-Italic|Nebirah,}} is one who looks into futurity and a clairvoyant; {{Style S-Italic|Nebi-poel,}} he who possesses {{Style S-Italic|magic powers.}} We notice that Elijah and Apollonius resorted to the same means to isolate themselves from the disturbing influences of the outer world, viz.: wrapping their heads entirely in a woolen mantle; from its being an electric non-conductor we must suppose.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Occultist}}.—One who studies the various branches of occult science. The term is used by the French kabalists (See Eliphas Levi’s works). Occultism embraces the whole range of psychological, physiological, cosmical, physical, and spiritual phenomena. From the word {{Style S-Italic|occult,}} hidden or secret; applying therefore to the study of the {{Style S-Italic|Kabala,}} astrology, alchemy, and all arcane sciences.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Pagan Gods}}.—This term gods is erroneously understood by most of the reading public, to mean idols. The idea attached to them is {{Style S-Italic|not}} that of something objective or anthropomorphical. With the exception of occasions when “gods” mean either divine planetary entities (angels), or disembodied spirits of pure men, the term simply conveys to the mind of the mystic—whether Hindu Hotar, Mazdean Mage, Egyptian hierophant, or disciple of the Greek philosophers—the idea of a visible or cognized manifestation of an invisible potency of nature. And such occult potencies are invoked under the appellation of various gods, who, for the time being, are personating these powers. Thus every one of the numberless deities of the Hindu, Greek, and Egyptian Pantheons, are simply Powers of the “Unseen Universe.” When the officiating Brahman invokes Aditya—who, in her cosmic character, is the goddess-sun—he simply {{Style S-Italic|commands}} that potency (personified in some god), which, as he asserts, “resides in the Mantra, as the sacred {{Style S-Italic|Vâch}}.” These god-powers are allegorically regarded as the divine {{Style S-Italic|Hotars}} of the Supreme One; while the priest (Brahman) is the human Hotar who officiates on earth, and representing that particular Power becomes, ambassador-like, invested with the very potency which he personates.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Pitris}}.—It is generally believed that the Hindu term {{Style S-Italic|Pitris}} means the spirits of our direct ancestors; of disembodied people. Hence the argument of some spiritualists that fakirs, and other Eastern wonder-workers, are {{Style S-Italic|mediums;}} that they themselves confess to being unable to produce anything without the help of the {{Style S-Italic|Pitris,}} of whom they are the obedient instruments. This is in more than one sense erroneous. The {{Style S-Italic|Pitris}} are not the ancestors of the present living men, but those of the human kind or Adamic race; the spirits of {{Style S-Italic|human}} races which, on the great scale of descending evolution, preceded our races of men, and were physically, as well as spiritually, far superior to our modern pigmies. In {{Style S-Italic|Manava-Dharma-Sastra}} they are called the {{Style S-Italic|Lunar}} ancestors.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Pythia}}, or Pythoness.—Webster dismisses the word very briefly by saying that it was the name of one who delivered the oracles at the Temple of Delphi, and “any female supposed to have the spirit of divination in her—{{Style S-Italic|a witch,”}} which is neither complimentary, exact, nor just. A Pythia, upon the authority of Plutarch, Iamblichus, Lamprias, and others, was a nervous sensitive; she was chosen from among the poorest class, young and pure. Attached to the temple, within whose precincts she had a room, secluded from every other, and to which no one but the priest, or seer, had admittance, she had no communications with the outside world, and her life was more strict and ascetic than that of a Catholic nun. Sitting on a tripod of brass placed over a fissure in the ground, through which arose intoxicating vapors, these subterranean

+

{{Style P-No indent|exhalations penetrating her whole system produced the prophetic mania. In this abnormal state she delivered oracles. She was sometimes called {{Style S-Italic|ventriloqua vates,}}{{Footnote mark|*|fn41}} the ventriloquist-prophetess.}}

+

The ancients placed the astral soul of man, ψυχη, or his self-consciousness, in the pit of the stomach. The Brahmans shared this belief with Plato and other philosophers. Thus we find in the fourth verse of the second {{Style S-Italic|Nabhânedishtha Hymn}} it is said: “Hear, O sons of the gods (spirits) one who speaks through his navel (nâbhâ) for he hails you in your dwellings!”

+

Many of the Sanscrit scholars agree that this belief is one of the most ancient among the Hindus. The modern fakirs, as well as the ancient gymnosophists, unite themselves with their Âtman and the Deity by remaining motionless in contemplation and concentrating their whole thought on their navel. As in modern somnambulic phenomena, the navel was regarded as “the circle of the sun,” the seat of internal divine light.{{Footnote mark|†|fn42}} Is the fact of a number of modern somnambulists being enabled to read letters, hear, smell, and see, through that part of their body to be regarded again as a simple “coincidence,” or shall we admit at last that the old sages knew something more of physiological and psychological mysteries than our modern Academicians? In modern Persia, when a “magician” (often simply a mesmerizer) is consulted upon occasions of theft and other puzzling occurrences, he makes his manipulations over the pit of his stomach, and so brings himself into a state of clairvoyance. Among the modern Parsis, remarks a translator of the {{Style S-Italic|Rig-vedas,}} there exists a belief up to the present day that their adepts have a flame in their navel, which enlightens to them all darkness and discloses the spiritual world, as well as all things unseen, or at a distance. They call it the lamp of {{Style S-Italic|the Deshtur,}} or high priest; the light of the Dikshita (the initiate), and otherwise designate it by many other names.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Samothraces}}.—A designation of the Fane-gods worshipped at Samothracia in the Mysteries. They are considered as identical with the Kabeiri, Dioskuri, and Korybantes. Their names were mystical—denoting Pluto, Ceres or Proserpina, Bacchus, and Æsculapius or Hermes.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Shamans}}, or Samaneans.—An order of Buddhists among the Tartars, especially those of Siberia. They are possibly akin to the philosophers

+

{{Footnote return|*|fn41}} See Pantheon: “Myths,” p. 31; also Aristophanes in “Vœstas,” i., reg. 28.

+

{{Footnote return|†|fn42}} The oracle of Apollo was at Delphos, the city of the δελφυς, womb or abdomen; the place of the temple was denominated the {{Style S-Italic|omphalos}} or navel. The symbols are female and lunary; reminding us that the Arcadians were called Proseleni, pre-Hellenic or more ancient than the period when Ionian and Olympian lunar worship was introduced.

+

{{Style P-No indent|anciently known as {{Style S-Italic|Brachmanes,}} mistaken sometimes for Brahmans.{{Footnote mark|*|fn43}} They are all {{Style S-Italic|magicians,}} or rather sensitives or mediums artificially developed. At present those who act as priests among the Tartars are generally very ignorant, and far below the fakirs in knowledge and education. Both men and women may be Shamans.}}

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Soma}}.—This Hindu sacred beverage answers to the Greek ambrosia or nectar, drunk by the gods of Olympus. A cup of kykeon was also quaffed by the mysta at the Eleusinian initiation. He who drinks it easily reaches {{Style S-Italic|Bradhna}}, or place of splendor (Heaven). The soma-drink known to Europeans is not the {{Style S-Italic|genuine}} beverage, but its substitute; for the initiated priests alone can taste of the real soma; and even kings and rajas, when sacrificing, receive the substitute. Haug shows by his own confession, in his {{Style S-Italic|Aytareya Brahmanan}}, that it was not the Soma that he tasted and found nasty, but the juice from the roots of the Nyagradha, a plant or bush which grows on the hills of Poona. We were positively informed that the majority of the sacrificial priests of the Dekkan have lost the secret of the true soma. It can be found neither in the ritual books nor through oral information. The true followers of the primitive Vedic religion are very few; these are the alleged descendants from the {{Style S-Italic|Rishis}}, the real Agnihôtris, the initiates of the great Mysteries. The soma-drink is also commemorated in the Hindu Pantheon, for it is called the King-Soma. He who drinks of it is made to participate in the heavenly king, because he becomes filled with it, as the Christian apostles and their converts became filled with the Holy Ghost, and purified of their sins. The soma makes a new man of the initiate; he is reborn and transformed, and his spiritual nature overcomes the physical; it gives the divine power of inspiration, and develops the clairvoyant faculty to the utmost. According to the exoteric explanation the soma is a plant, but, at the same time it is an angel. It forcibly connects the {{Style S-Italic|inner}}, highest “spirit” of man, which spirit is an angel like the mystical soma, with his “irrational soul,” or astral body, and thus united by the power of the magic drink, they soar together above physical nature, and participate during life in the beatitude and ineffable glories of Heaven.

+

Thus the Hindu soma is mystically, and in all respects the same that the Eucharistic supper is to the Christian. The idea is similar. By

+

{{Footnote return|*|fn43}} From the accounts of Strabo and Megasthenes, who visited Palibothras, it would seem that the persons termed by him Samanean, or Brachmane priests, were simply Buddhists. “The singularly subtile replies of the Samanean or Brahman philosophers, in their interview with the conqueror, will be found to contain the spirit of the Buddhist doctrine,” remarks Upham. (See the “History and Doctrine of Buddhism;” and Hale’s “Chronology,” vol. iii, p. 238.)

+

{{Style P-No indent|means of the sacrificial prayers—the mantras—this liquor is supposed to be transformed on the spot into real soma—or the angel, and even into Brahma himself. Some missionaries have expressed themselves very indignantly about this ceremony, the more so, that, generally speaking, the Brahmans use a {{Style S-Italic|kind of spirituous liquor}} as a substitute. But do the Christians believe less fervently in the transubstantiation of the communion-wine into the blood of Christ, because this wine happens to be more or less spirituous? Is not the idea of the symbol attached to it the same? But the missionaries say that this hour of soma-drinking is the golden hour of Satan, who lurks at the bottom of the Hindu sacrificial cup.{{Footnote mark|*|fn44}}}}

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Spirit}}.—The lack of any mutual agreement between writers in the use of this word has resulted in dire confusion. It is commonly made synonymous with {{Style S-Italic|soul;}} and the lexicographers countenance the usage. This is the natural result of our ignorance of the other word, and repudiation of the classification adopted by the ancients. Elsewhere we attempt to make clear the distinction between the terms “spirit” and “soul.” There are no more important passages in this work. Meanwhile, we will only add that “spirit” is the νοῦς of Plato, the immortal, immaterial, and purely {{Style S-Italic|divine}} principle in man—the crown of the human {{Style S-Italic|Triad;}} whereas,

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Soul}} is the ψυχη, or the {{Style S-Italic|nephesh}} of the {{Style S-Italic|Bible;}} the vital principle, or the breath of life, which every animal, down to the infusoria, shares with man. In the translated {{Style S-Italic|Bible}} it stands indifferently for {{Style S-Italic|life}}, blood, and soul. “Let us {{Style S-Italic|not kill}} his nephesh,” says the original text: “let us not kill {{Style S-Italic|him}},” translate the Christians ({{Style S-Italic|Genesis}} xxxvii. 21), and so on.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Theosophists}}.—In the mediæval ages it was the name by which were known the disciples of Paracelsus of the sixteenth century, the so-called fire-philosophers or {{Style S-Italic|Philosophi per ignem.}} As well as the Platonists they regarded the soul (ψυχη) and the divine spirit, {{Style S-Italic|nous}} (νοῦς) as a particle of the great Archos—a fire taken from the eternal ocean of light.

+

The Theosophical Society, to which these volumes are dedicated by the author as a mark of affectionate regard, was organized at New York in 1875. The object of its founders was to experiment practically in the occult powers of Nature, and to collect and disseminate among Christians information about the Oriental religious philosophies. Later, it has determined to spread among the “poor benighted heathen” such evi-

+

{{Footnote return|*|fn44}} In their turn, the heathen may well ask the missionaries what sort of a spirit lurks at the bottom of the sacrificial beer-bottle. That evangelical New York journal, the “Independent,” says: “A late English traveller found a simple-minded Baptist mission church, in far-off Burmah, using for the communion service, and we doubt not with God’s blessing, Bass’s pale ale instead of wine.” Circumstances alter cases, it seems!

+

{{Style P-No indent|dences as to the practical results of Christianity as will at least give both sides of the story to the communities among which missionaries are at work. With this view it has established relations with associations and individuals throughout the East, to whom it furnishes authenticated reports of the ecclesiastical crimes and misdemeanors, schisms and heresies, controversies and litigations, doctrinal differences and biblical criticisms and revisions, with which the press of Christian Europe and America constantly teems. Christendom has been long and minutely informed of the degradation and brutishness into which Buddhism, Brahmanism, and Confucianism have plunged their deluded votaries, and many millions have been lavished upon foreign missions under such false representations. The Theosophical Society, seeing daily exemplifications of this very state of things as the sequence of Christian teaching and example—the latter especially—thought it simple justice to make the facts known in Palestine, India, Ceylon, Cashmere, Tartary, Thibet, China, and Japan, in all which countries it has influential correspondents. It may also in time have much to say about the conduct of the missionaries to those who contribute to their support.}}

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Theurgist}}.—From Θεος, god, and εργον, work. The first school of practical theurgy in the Christian period was founded by Iamblichus among the Alexandrian Platonists; but the priests attached to the temples of Egypt, Assyria, and Babylonia, and who took an active part in the evocations of the gods during the Sacred Mysteries, were known by this name from the earliest archaic period. The purpose of it was to make spirits visible to the eyes of mortals. A theurgist was one expert in the esoteric learning of the Sanctuaries of all the great countries. The Neoplatonists of the school of Iamblichus were called theurgists, for they performed the so-called “ceremonial magic,” and evoked the “spirits” of the departed heroes, “gods,” and Daimonia (δαιμονια, divine, spiritual entities). In the rare cases when the presence of a {{Style S-Italic|tangible}} and {{Style S-Italic|visible}} spirit was required, the theurgist had to furnish the weird apparition with a portion of his own flesh and blood—he had to perform the {{Style S-Italic|theopœa}}, or the “creation of gods,” by a mysterious process well known to the modern fakirs and initiated Brahmans of India. This is what is said in the {{Style S-Italic|Book of Evocations}} of the pagodas. It shows the perfect identity of rites and ceremonial between the oldest Brahmanic theurgy and that of the Alexandrian Platonists:

+

“The Brahman Grihasta (the evocator) must be in a state of complete purity before he ventures to call forth the Pitris.”

+

After having prepared a lamp, some sandal, incense, etc., and having traced the magic circles taught to him by the superior guru, in order to keep away {{Style S-Italic|bad}} spirits, he “ceases to breathe, and calls {{Style S-Italic|the fire}} to his

+

{{Style P-No indent|help to disperse his body.” He pronounces a certain number of times the sacred word, and “his soul escapes from his body, and his body disappears, and the soul of the evoked spirit descends into the {{Style S-Italic|double}} body and animates it.” Then “His (Grihasta’s) soul reënters into his body, whose subtile particles have again been aggregating, after having formed of their emanations an aërial body to the spirit he evoked.”}}

+

And now, that he has formed for the Pitri a body with the particles the most essential and pure of his own, the grihasta is allowed, after the ceremonial sacrifice is over, to “converse with the souls of the ancestors and the Pitris, and offer them questions on the mysteries of the {{Style S-Italic|Being}} and the transformations of the {{Style S-Italic|imperishable.”}}

+

“Then after having blown out his lamp he must light it again, and set at liberty the bad spirits shut out from the place by the magical circles, and leave the sanctuary of the Pitris.”{{Footnote mark|*|fn45}}

+

The school of Iamblichus was distinct from that of Plotinus and Porphyry, who were strongly against ceremonial magic and practical theurgy as dangerous, though these two eminent men firmly believed in both. “The {{Style S-Italic|theurgic}} or {{Style S-Italic|benevolent}} magic, the Goëtic, or dark and evil necromancy, were alike in preëminent repute {{Style S-Italic|during the first century}} of the Christian era.”{{Footnote mark|†|fn46}} But never have any of the highly moral and pious philosophers, whose fame has descended to us spotless of any evil deed, practiced any other kind of magic than the theurgic, or {{Style S-Italic|benevolent,}} as Bulwer-Lytton terms it. “Whoever is acquainted with the nature {{Style S-Italic|of divinely luminous appearances}} (φασματα) knows also on what account it is requisite to abstain from all birds (animal food), and especially for him who hastens to be liberated from terrestrial concerns and to be established with the celestial gods,” says Porphyry.{{Footnote mark|‡|fn47}}

+

Though he refused to practice theurgy himself, Porphyry, in his {{Style S-Italic|Life of Plotinus,}} mentions a priest of Egypt, who, “at the request of a certain friend of Plotinus (which friend was perhaps Porphyry himself, remarks T. Taylor), exhibited to Plotinus, in the temple of Isis at Rome, the familiar daimon, or, in modern language, the {{Style S-Italic|guardian angel}} of that philosopher.”{{Footnote mark|§|fn48}}

+

The popular, prevailing idea was that the theurgists, as well as the magicians, worked wonders, such as evoking the souls or shadows of the heroes and gods, and doing other thaumaturgic works by supernatural powers.

+

{{Style S-Small capitals|Yajna}}.—“The Yajna,” say the Brahmans, exists from eternity, for

+

{{Footnote return|*|fn45}} “Book of Brahmanical Evocations,” part iii.

+

{{Footnote return|†|fn46}} Bulwer-Lytton: “Last Days of Pompeii,” p. 147.

+

{{Footnote return|‡|fn47}} “Select Works,” p. 159.

+

{{Footnote return|§|fn48}} Ibid., p. 92.

+

{{Style P-No indent|it proceeded forth from the Supreme One, the {{Style S-Italic|Brahma-Prajapâti}}, in whom it lay dormant from “{{Style S-Italic|no}} beginning.” It is the key to the traividya, the thrice sacred science contained in the Rig verses, which teaches the Yagus or sacrificial mysteries. “The Yajna” exists as an invisible thing at all times; it is like the latent power of electricity in an electrifying machine, requiring only the operation of a suitable apparatus in order to be elicited. It is supposed to extend from the {{Style S-Italic|Ahavaniya}} or sacrificial fire to the heavens, forming a bridge or ladder by means of which the sacrificer can communicate with the world of gods and spirits, and even ascend when alive to their abodes.{{Footnote mark|*|fn49}}}}

+

This {{Style S-Italic|Yajna}} is again one of the forms of the Akâsa, and the mystic word calling it into existence and pronounced mentally by the initiated Priest is the {{Style S-Italic|Lost Word}} receiving impulse through {{Style S-Small capitals|will-power}}.

+

To complete the list, we will now add that in the course of the following chapters, whenever we use the term {{Style S-Italic|Archaic,}} we mean before the time of Pythagoras; when {{Style S-Italic|Ancient,}} before the time of Mahomet; and when {{Style S-Italic|Mediæval,}} the period between Mahomet and Martin Luther. It will only be necessary to infringe the rule when from time to time we may have to speak of nations of a pre-Pythagorean antiquity, and will adopt the common custom of calling them “ancient.”

+

+

Before closing this initial chapter, we venture to say a few words in explanation of the plan of this work. Its object is not to force upon the public the personal views or theories of its author; nor has it the pretensions of a scientific work, which aims at creating a revolution in some department of thought. It is rather a brief summary of the religions, philosophies, and universal traditions of human kind, and the exegesis of the same, in the spirit of those secret doctrines, of which none—thanks to prejudice and bigotry—have reached Christendom in so unmutilated a form, as to secure it a fair judgment. Since the days of the unlucky mediæval philosophers, the last to write upon these secret doctrines of which they were the depositaries, few men have dared to brave persecution and prejudice by placing their knowledge upon record. And these few have never, as a rule, written for the public, but only for those of their own and succeeding times who possessed the key to their jargon. The multitude, not understanding them or their doctrines, have been accustomed to regard them {{Style S-Italic|en masse}} as either charlatans or dreamers. Hence the unmerited contempt into which the study of the noblest of sciences—that of the spiritual man—has gradually fallen.

+

{{Footnote return|*|fn49}} “Aitareya Brahmanan,” Introduction.

+

In undertaking to inquire into the assumed infallibility of Modern Science and Theology, the author has been forced, even at the risk of being thought discursive, to make constant comparison of the ideas, achievements, and pretensions of their representatives, with those of the ancient philosophers and religious teachers. Things the most widely separated as to time, have thus been brought into immediate juxtaposition, for only thus could the priority and parentage of discoveries and dogmas be determined. In discussing the merits of our scientific contemporaries, their own confessions of failure in experimental research, of baffling mysteries, of missing links in their chains of theory, of inability to comprehend natural phenomena, of ignorance of the laws of the causal world, have furnished the basis for the present study. Especially (since Psychology has been so much neglected, and the East is so far away that few of our investigators will ever get there to study that science where alone it is understood), we will review the speculations and policy of noted authorities in connection with those modern psychological phenomena which began at Rochester and have now overspread the world. {{Style S-Italic|We wish to show how inevitable were their innumerable failures, and how they must continue until these pretended authorities of the West go to the Brahmans and Lamaists of the far Orient, and respectfully ask them to impart the alphabet of true science.}} We have laid no charge against scientists that is not supported by their own published admissions, and if our citations from the records of antiquity rob some of what they have hitherto viewed as well-earned laurels, the fault is not ours but Truth’s. No man worthy of the name of philosopher would care to wear honors that rightfully belong to another.

+

Deeply sensible of the Titanic struggle that is now in progress between materialism and the spiritual aspirations of mankind, our constant endeavor has been to gather into our several chapters, like weapons into armories, every fact and argument that can be used to aid the latter in defeating the former. Sickly and deformed child as it now is, the materialism of To-Day is born of the brutal Yesterday. Unless its growth is arrested, it may become our master. It is the bastard progeny of the French Revolution and its reaction against ages of religious bigotry and repression. To prevent the crushing of these spiritual aspirations, the blighting of these hopes, and the deadening of that intuition which teaches us of a God and a hereafter, we must show our false theologies in their naked deformity, and distinguish between divine religion and human dogmas. Our voice is raised for spiritual freedom, and our plea made for enfranchisement from all tyranny, whether of {{Style S-Small capitals|Science or Theology}}.

Pavel Malakhov

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted

10,275

edits

Changes

Blavatsky H.P. - Isis Unveiled (view source)

Revision as of 07:47, 10 March 2024

Navigation menu

Search