Changes

Jump to: navigation, search
m
image link fixed
Now do I deny the presence of Esoterism & of the <u>universal language</u>, the {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">one lip</span>}} of the 4<sup>th</sup> Race – in the Old Testament? {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">Never</span>}}. I say it is there. And as you have shown it is also in New T. and this proves that the Initiates who wrote the Synopties & St. John – were of the same school of initiates as the Essenes, the Egyptians, the Greeks, especially as St. Paul was. That the history of Jesus is not his life or biography, not even the history of three or four years of his life, but simply the allegorical rendering of years of probation, Initiation, trials & final glorification of the Initiate of any country whether to be called Visva Karma, Apollonius of Tyana, Osiris, Wittoba or Sallivana, or Jesus. What I say, again, is, that while the Jews & the early Christians, remodeled or made their Scripture to fit in with the original archaic tradition & the universal astro-cosmic {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">Initiation</span>}} by adapting it only to the astronomical & purely physiological materialistic myths – they left the metaphysical, cosmic and theological portions of it untouched; for, pretending to monotheism they would avoid the purely pagan, philosophical views of the Universe. They have done this in most ingenious & clever way imaginable, & have succeeded thereby to blind long series of generations into the idea that they (the Jews) were the “chosen people” of Jehovah & Christians an improvement on that {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">chosen</span>}} people. But, I say it again – they have, neither of them, given anything new or original whatever, in the real esoteric meaning – not to the Hindus, at any rate, now the only people on Earth who have preserved the original {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">Archaic</span>}} doctrines.
This takes nothing away from your independent discovery, which is of great importance to the world. Its greatest merit is for the Western World, since you have put it so clearly, in such scientific <u>mathematical</u> language – hence made your discovery & proofs <u>inattackable</u>. But all you say is known to Eastern occultism and you may find more than one thing in <u>Isis</u>, vague & hazy & put in my flapdoodle pigeon English 4, still the spirit of it is there, but you have created a tangible, <u>objective body</u> for that which in my work may be regarded as a shadowy phantom of imagination. But if you add Eastern philosophy to your own independent research you will have to give up your ideas of the holiness of the Hebrew scrolls about which you are so enthusiastic. The Jews have never & at no time been monotheists – not as the word is understood in the West; though they may have been as some Hindu sects now who choose s favorite god among the <u>Devas</u> and make the rest subservient to that creature. The early Jews were Pantheists as we are, & the later – {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">humbugs</span>}}. The gentiles were too philosophical to create unto themselves<u> one</u>, <u>personal</u>, <u>anthropomorphic</u> god & call him <u>infinite</u> while showing his relation to men & things – finite; to call him {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">absolute</span>}}, yet to make him concerned with conditioned subjects; {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">Noumenal</span>}} Perfect Eternal – yet subject to passions. All this is an absurdity in logic as in philosophy. You may consider me an <u>atheist</u>. I say <u>I am not</u>. I believe in a Boundless, Eternal Infinite <u>Abstract</u> Principle (<u>abstract</u> to any limited understanding); in a <u>Causeless</u> Cause, a Rootless <u>Root</u> of all that exists – your <u>Circle</u>, in short, as you defined it & which no man can know. You call its diameter the {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">One</span>}}, so do we – but what you think of or how you define it <u>finally</u> is not yet clear to me. But in Part I of my S. D. I give the various circles, differentiating from the first race to the last. It is ⵔ – precosmic <u>aspect</u>; ⨀ – at the dawn of Manvantara; ⊖ – the first <u>manifested</u> Cosmis plane; Mother-Chaos or Nature appearing across the infinite Circle at its reawakening. Then and when the 1<sup>st</sup> Race of mankind (<u>collective</u> Adam) was projected on the seven zones of the Earth by the Progenitors or <u>Pitris</u>, from within themselves – it became [[File:ЕПБ - Письмо Скиннеру 17.02.1887, cимвол пи.png]] (or ⧍ ∣ □ − ☆ within & around the circle). Because the 7 hosts of the “Septenary” had, by <u>dedoubling</u> themselves, so to say, become 14. These 7 septenary groups are called the <u>49 Fires</u> of life of Being – the divine Spirit of the Earth. You will find the same idea in <u>Divine Pymander</u> of <u>Hermes Trismegistus</u> in his “7 governors” & Nature building or forming <u>Seven</u> there simultaneously on the Seven Centres of the Universe. Then – the 2<sup>d</sup> Race has [[File:ЕПБ - Письмо Скиннеру 17.02.1887, cимвол 2-й расы.png]] the “egg-evolving” & bisexual Race following the <u>Sexless</u> which, had evolved in its turn, the Second Race by <u>dedoubling</u> as their progenitors did – only more physical though still <u>boneless</u>. This egg-business is hinted at by the Greek mythos of Leda & the Swan& their progeny Castor & Pollux. Then, the 3<sup>d</sup></u> Race has in its beginning ⑧, the glyph of the androgyne & ends by ⦶the <u>phallic</u> & <u>yoni</u> separation. Where I get “my authority from”? From the <u>Book of Dzyan</u> (Wisdom)& {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">Masters</span>}} in whom you have hitherto declared to believe, only, perhaps because {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">They</span>}} are living & mortal men. I am curious to know what you make of the [[ФайлFile:Свастика в круге 2.png]] <u>Svastika</u> within the circle which became the “sacred Sign” with the Atlanteans & by being transformed into 卐 (minus its circle) thus became the first phallic sign of the accursed materialistic Race – the <u>Fouth</u>, & of our own – the Fifth. I make of it the Hebrew (?) א <u>aleph</u> – the {{#tag:span|<span style="text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-style:double">Bull</span>}} (the male aspect of the Hindu <u>Cow</u>). Tell me if you believe me right or wrong.
These are the most archaic signs & glyphs. From this point 卐– henceforward, I leave you full sway. You have studied thoroughly & comprehend sexual symbols to perfection, better than I do, for I am not for physiological but for the metaphysical.

Navigation menu