Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
11,090
edits
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
{{Page|3|proem.}} | {{Page|3|proem.}} | ||
phenomenon in Nature. * Intra-Cosmic motion is eternal and ceaseless; cosmic motion (the visible, or that which is subject to perception) is finite and periodical. As an eternal abstraction it is the {{Style S-Small capitals|ever-present}}; as a manifestation, it is finite both in the coming direction and the opposite, the two being the alpha and omega of successive reconstructions. Kosmos — the {{Style S-Small capitals|noumenon}}—has nought to do with the causal relations of the phenomenal World. It is only with reference to the intra-cosmic soul, the ideal Kosmos in the immutable Divine Thought, that we may say : “ It never had a beginning nor will it have an end.” With regard to its body or Cosmic organization, though it cannot be said that it had a first, or will ever have a last construction, yet at each new Manvantara, its organization may be regarded as the first and the last of its kind, as it evolutes every time on a higher plane . . . . | {{Style P-No indent|phenomenon in Nature. * Intra-Cosmic motion is eternal and ceaseless; cosmic motion (the visible, or that which is subject to perception) is finite and periodical. As an eternal abstraction it is the {{Style S-Small capitals|ever-present}}; as a manifestation, it is finite both in the coming direction and the opposite, the two being the alpha and omega of successive reconstructions. Kosmos — the {{Style S-Small capitals|noumenon}}—has nought to do with the causal relations of the phenomenal World. It is only with reference to the intra-cosmic soul, the ideal Kosmos in the immutable Divine Thought, that we may say : “ It never had a beginning nor will it have an end.” With regard to its body or Cosmic organization, though it cannot be said that it had a first, or will ever have a last construction, yet at each new Manvantara, its organization may be regarded as the first and the last of its kind, as it evolutes every time on a higher plane . . . .}} | ||
A few years ago only, it was stated that: — | A few years ago only, it was stated that: — | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
{{Page|4|the secret doctrine.}} | {{Page|4|the secret doctrine.}} | ||
{{Style P-Quote|two are able to understand the profound logic of their philosophy. The former will allow of no other God than the personified secondary powers which have worked out the visible universe, and which became with them the anthropomorphic God of the Christians — the male Jehovah, roaring amid thunder and lightning. In its turn, rationalistic science greets the Buddhists and the Svabhâvikas as the “ positivists ” of the archaic ages. If we take a onesided view of the philosophy of the latter, our materialists may be right in their own way. The Buddhists maintained that there is no Creator, but an infinitude of creative powers, which collectively form the one eternal substance, the essence of which is inscrutable — hence not a subject for speculation for any true philosopher. Socrates invariably refused to argue upon the mystery of universal being, yet no one would ever have thought of charging him with atheism, except those who were bent upon his destruction. Upon inaugurating an active period, says the Secret Doctrine, an expansion of this Divine essence from without inwardly and from within outwardly, occurs in obedience to eternal and immutable law, and the phenomenal or visible universe is the ultimate result of the long chain of cosmical forces thus progressively set in motion. In like manner, when the passive condition is resumed, a contraction of the Divine essence takes place, and the previous work of creation is gradually and progressively undone. The visible universe becomes disintegrated, its material dispersed ; and ‘ darkness ’ solitary and alone, broods once more over the face of the ‘deep.’ To use a Metaphor from the Secret Books, which will convey the idea still more clearly, an out- breathing of the ‘ unknown essence ’ produces the world ; and an inhalation causes it to disappear. This process has been going on from all eternity, and our present universe is but one of an infinite series, which had no beginning and will have no end.” —(''See'' “ ''Isis Unveiled;'' ” ''also'' “ ''The Days and Nights of Brahmâ'' ” ''in Part II.'')}} | {{Style P-Quote|{{Style P-No indent|two are able to understand the profound logic of their philosophy. The former will allow of no other God than the personified secondary powers which have worked out the visible universe, and which became with them the anthropomorphic God of the Christians — the male Jehovah, roaring amid thunder and lightning. In its turn, rationalistic science greets the Buddhists and the Svabhâvikas as the “ positivists ” of the archaic ages. If we take a onesided view of the philosophy of the latter, our materialists may be right in their own way. The Buddhists maintained that there is no Creator, but an infinitude of creative powers, which collectively form the one eternal substance, the essence of which is inscrutable — hence not a subject for speculation for any true philosopher. Socrates invariably refused to argue upon the mystery of universal being, yet no one would ever have thought of charging him with atheism, except those who were bent upon his destruction. Upon inaugurating an active period, says the Secret Doctrine, an expansion of this Divine essence from without inwardly and from within outwardly, occurs in obedience to eternal and immutable law, and the phenomenal or visible universe is the ultimate result of the long chain of cosmical forces thus progressively set in motion. In like manner, when the passive condition is resumed, a contraction of the Divine essence takes place, and the previous work of creation is gradually and progressively undone. The visible universe becomes disintegrated, its material dispersed ; and ‘ darkness ’ solitary and alone, broods once more over the face of the ‘deep.’ To use a Metaphor from the Secret Books, which will convey the idea still more clearly, an out- breathing of the ‘ unknown essence ’ produces the world ; and an inhalation causes it to disappear. This process has been going on from all eternity, and our present universe is but one of an infinite series, which had no beginning and will have no end.” —(''See'' “ ''Isis Unveiled;'' ” ''also'' “ ''The Days and Nights of Brahmâ'' ” ''in Part II.'')}}}} | ||
This passage will be explained, as far as it is possible, in the present work. Though, as it now stands, it contains nothing new to the Orientalist, its esoteric interpretation may contain a good deal which has hitherto remained entirely unknown to the Western student. | This passage will be explained, as far as it is possible, in the present work. Though, as it now stands, it contains nothing new to the Orientalist, its esoteric interpretation may contain a good deal which has hitherto remained entirely unknown to the Western student. | ||
The first illustration being a plain disc [[File:Sd-circle.jpg|x25px]], the second one in the Archaic symbol shows [[File:sd-circle_with_dot.jpg|x25px]], a disc with a point in it — the first differentiation in the periodical manifestations of the ever-eternal nature, sexless and infinite “ Aditi in {{Style S-Small capitals|that}} ” (Rig Veda), the point in the disc, or potential Space within abstract Space. In its third stage the point | The first illustration being a plain disc [[File:Sd-circle.jpg|x25px]], the second one in the Archaic symbol shows [[File:sd-circle_with_dot.jpg|x25px]], a disc with a point in it — the first differentiation in the periodical manifestations of the ever-eternal nature, sexless and infinite “ Aditi in {{Style S-Small capitals|that}} ” (Rig Veda), the point in the disc, or potential Space within abstract Space. In its third stage the point is transformed into a diameter, thus [[File:sd-circle_with_horizontal_diameter.jpg|x25px]] it now symbolises a divine immaculate Mother-Nature within the all-embracing absolute Infinitude. | ||
is transformed into a diameter, thus [[File:sd-circle_with_horizontal_diameter.jpg|x25px]] it now symbolises a divine immaculate Mother-Nature within the all-embracing absolute Infinitude. | |||
{{Page|5|proem.}} | {{Page|5|proem.}} | ||
When the diameter line is crossed by a vertical one [[File:sd-circle_with_cross.jpg|x25px]], it becomes the mundane cross. Humanity has reached its third root-race ; it is the sign for the origin of human life to begin. When the circumference disappears and leaves only the [[File:sd-cross.jpg|x25px]] it is a sign that the fall of man into matter is accomplished, and the {{Style S-Small capitals|fourth }}race begins. The Cross within a circle symbolises pure Pantheism ; when the Cross was left uninscribed, it became phallic. It had the same and yet other meanings as a {{Style S-Small capitals|tau}} inscribed within a circle [[File:sd-circle_with_tau.jpg|x25px]] or as a “ Thor’s hammer,” the Jaina cross, so-called, or simply Svastica within a circle [[File:sd-circle_with_svastika.jpg|x25px]] | {{Style P-No indent|When the diameter line is crossed by a vertical one [[File:sd-circle_with_cross.jpg|x25px]], it becomes the mundane cross. Humanity has reached its third root-race ; it is the sign for the origin of human life to begin. When the circumference disappears and leaves only the [[File:sd-cross.jpg|x25px]] it is a sign that the fall of man into matter is accomplished, and the {{Style S-Small capitals|fourth }}race begins. The Cross within a circle symbolises pure Pantheism ; when the Cross was left uninscribed, it became phallic. It had the same and yet other meanings as a {{Style S-Small capitals|tau}} inscribed within a circle [[File:sd-circle_with_tau.jpg|x25px]] or as a “ Thor’s hammer,” the Jaina cross, so-called, or simply Svastica within a circle [[File:sd-circle_with_svastika.jpg|x25px]]}} | ||
By the third symbol — the circle divided in two by the horizontal line of the diameter — the first manifestation of creative (still passive, because feminine) Nature was meant. The first shadowy perception of man connected with procreation is feminine, because man knows his mother more than his father. Hence female deities were more sacred than the male. Nature is therefore feminine, and, to a degree, objective and tangible, and the spirit Principle which fructifies it is concealed. By adding to the circle with the horizontal line in it, a perpendicular line, the tau was formed — [[File:sd-tau.jpg|x25px]] — the oldest form of the letter. It was the glyph of the third root-race to the day of its symbolical Fall — ''i.e.'', when the separation of sexes by natural evolution took place — when the figure became [[File:sd-circle_with_vertical_diameter.jpg|x25px]], the circle, or sexless life modified or separated — a double glyph or symbol. With the races of our Fifth Race it became in symbology the sacr’, and in Hebrew n’cabvah, of the first-formed races; * then it changed into the Egyptian [[File:sd-ankh.jpg|x25px]] (emblem of life), and still later into the sign of Venus [[File:sd-venus.jpg|x25px]], Then comes the Svastica (Thor’s hammer, or the “ Hermetic Cross ” now), entirely separated from its Circle, thus becoming purely phallic. The esoteric symbol of Kali Yuga is the five-pointed star reversed, thus [[File:sd-star_down.jpg|x25px]] — the sign of human sorcery, with its two points (horns) turned heavenward, a position every | By the third symbol — the circle divided in two by the horizontal line of the diameter — the first manifestation of creative (still passive, because feminine) Nature was meant. The first shadowy perception of man connected with procreation is feminine, because man knows his mother more than his father. Hence female deities were more sacred than the male. Nature is therefore feminine, and, to a degree, objective and tangible, and the spirit Principle which fructifies it is concealed. By adding to the circle with the horizontal line in it, a perpendicular line, the tau was formed — [[File:sd-tau.jpg|x25px]] — the oldest form of the letter. It was the glyph of the third root-race to the day of its symbolical Fall — ''i.e.'', when the separation of sexes by natural evolution took place — when the figure became [[File:sd-circle_with_vertical_diameter.jpg|x25px]], the circle, or sexless life modified or separated — a double glyph or symbol. With the races of our Fifth Race it became in symbology the sacr’, and in Hebrew n’cabvah, of the first-formed races; * then it changed into the Egyptian [[File:sd-ankh.jpg|x25px]] (emblem of life), and still later into the sign of Venus [[File:sd-venus.jpg|x25px]], Then comes the Svastica (Thor’s hammer, or the “ Hermetic Cross ” now), entirely separated from its Circle, thus becoming purely phallic. The esoteric symbol of Kali Yuga is the five-pointed star reversed, thus [[File:sd-star_down.jpg|x25px]] — the sign of human sorcery, with its two points (horns) turned heavenward, a position every | ||
Line 73: | Line 71: | ||
{{Page|6|the secret doctrine.}} | {{Page|6|the secret doctrine.}} | ||
Occultist will recognise as one of the “ left-hand,” and used in ceremonial magic. * | {{Style P-No indent|Occultist will recognise as one of the “ left-hand,” and used in ceremonial magic. *}} | ||
It is hoped that during the perusal of this work the erroneous ideas of the public in general with regard to Pantheism will be modified. It is wrong and unjust to regard the Buddhists and Advaitee Occultists as atheists. If not all of them philosophers, they are, at any rate, all logicians, their objections and arguments being based on strict reasoning. Indeed, if the Parabrahmam of the Hindus may be taken as a representative of the hidden and nameless deities of other nations, this absolute Principle will be found to be the prototype from which all the others were copied. Parabrahm is not “ God,” because It is not ''a ''God. “ It is that which is supreme, and not supreme (paravara),” explains Mandukya Upanishad (2.28). {{Style S-Small capitals|It}} is “ Supreme ” as {{Style S-Small capitals|cause}}, not supreme as effect. Parabrahm is simply, as a “ Secondless Reality,” the allinclusive Kosmos — or, rather, the infinite Cosmic Space — in the highest spiritual sense, of course. Brahma (neuter) being the unchanging, pure, free, undecaying supreme Root, “ the {{Style S-Small capitals|one}} true Existence, Paramarthika,” and the absolute Chit and Chaitanya (intelligence, consciousness) cannot be a cogniser, “ for {{Style S-Small capitals|that}} can have no subject of cognition.” Can the flame be called the essence of Fire ? This Essence is “ the {{Style S-Small capitals|life}} and {{Style S-Small capitals|light}} of the Universe, the visible fire and flame are destruction, death, and evil.” “ Fire and Flame destroy the body of an Arhat, their essence makes him immortal.” ''(Bodhi-mur, Book II.)'' “ The knowledge of the absolute Spirit, like the effulgence of the sun, or like heat in fire, is naught else than the absolute Essence itself,” says Sankaracharya. IT — is “ the Spirit of the Fire,” not fire itself ; therefore, “ the attributes of the latter, heat or flame, are not the attributes of the Spirit, but of that of which that Spirit is the unconscious cause.” Is not the above sentence the true key-note of later Rosicrucian | It is hoped that during the perusal of this work the erroneous ideas of the public in general with regard to Pantheism will be modified. It is wrong and unjust to regard the Buddhists and Advaitee Occultists as atheists. If not all of them philosophers, they are, at any rate, all logicians, their objections and arguments being based on strict reasoning. Indeed, if the Parabrahmam of the Hindus may be taken as a representative of the hidden and nameless deities of other nations, this absolute Principle will be found to be the prototype from which all the others were copied. Parabrahm is not “ God,” because It is not ''a ''God. “ It is that which is supreme, and not supreme (paravara),” explains Mandukya Upanishad (2.28). {{Style S-Small capitals|It}} is “ Supreme ” as {{Style S-Small capitals|cause}}, not supreme as effect. Parabrahm is simply, as a “ Secondless Reality,” the allinclusive Kosmos — or, rather, the infinite Cosmic Space — in the highest spiritual sense, of course. Brahma (neuter) being the unchanging, pure, free, undecaying supreme Root, “ the {{Style S-Small capitals|one}} true Existence, Paramarthika,” and the absolute Chit and Chaitanya (intelligence, consciousness) cannot be a cogniser, “ for {{Style S-Small capitals|that}} can have no subject of cognition.” Can the flame be called the essence of Fire ? This Essence is “ the {{Style S-Small capitals|life}} and {{Style S-Small capitals|light}} of the Universe, the visible fire and flame are destruction, death, and evil.” “ Fire and Flame destroy the body of an Arhat, their essence makes him immortal.” ''(Bodhi-mur, Book II.)'' “ The knowledge of the absolute Spirit, like the effulgence of the sun, or like heat in fire, is naught else than the absolute Essence itself,” says Sankaracharya. IT — is “ the Spirit of the Fire,” not fire itself ; therefore, “ the attributes of the latter, heat or flame, are not the attributes of the Spirit, but of that of which that Spirit is the unconscious cause.” Is not the above sentence the true key-note of later Rosicrucian | ||
Line 83: | Line 81: | ||
{{Page|7|proem.}} | {{Page|7|proem.}} | ||
philosophy ? Parabrahm is, in short, the collective aggregate of Kosmos in its infinity and eternity, the “ {{Style S-Small capitals|that}} ” and “ {{Style S-Small capitals|this}} ” to which distributive aggregates can not be applied. * “ In the beginning {{Style S-Small capitals|this}} was the Self, one only ” ''(Aitareya Upanishad) ;'' the great Sankaracharya explains that “ {{Style S-Small capitals|this}} ” referred to the Universe (Jagat); the sense of the words, “ In the beginning,” meaning before the reproduction of the phenomenal Universe. | {{Style P-No indent|philosophy ? Parabrahm is, in short, the collective aggregate of Kosmos in its infinity and eternity, the “ {{Style S-Small capitals|that}} ” and “ {{Style S-Small capitals|this}} ” to which distributive aggregates can not be applied. * “ In the beginning {{Style S-Small capitals|this}} was the Self, one only ” ''(Aitareya Upanishad) ;'' the great Sankaracharya explains that “ {{Style S-Small capitals|this}} ” referred to the Universe (Jagat); the sense of the words, “ In the beginning,” meaning before the reproduction of the phenomenal Universe.}} | ||
Therefore, when the Pantheists echo the Upanishads, which state, as in the Secret Doctrine, that “ this ” cannot create, they do not deny a Creator, or rather a ''collective aggregate'' of creators, but only refuse, very logically, to attribute “ creation ” and especially formation, something finite, to an Infinite Principle. With them, Parabrahmam is a passive because an Absolute Cause, the unconditioned ''Mukta.'' It is only limited Omniscience and Omnipotence that are refused to the latter, because these are still attributes (as reflected in man’s perceptions) ; and because Parabrahm, being the “ Supreme {{Style S-Small capitals|all}},” the ever invisible spirit and Soul of Nature, changeless and eternal, can have no attributes ; absoluteness very naturally precluding any idea of the finite or conditioned from being connected with it. And if the Vedantin postulates attributes as belonging simply to its emanation, calling it “ Iswara ''plus'' Maya,” and Avidya (Agnosticism and Nescience rather than ignorance), it is difficult to find any Atheism in this conception. † Since there can be neither two {{Style S-Small capitals|infinites}} nor two {{Style S-Small capitals|absolutes}} in a Universe supposed to be Boundless, this Self-Existence can hardly be conceived of as creating personally. In the sense and perceptions of finite “ Beings,” {{Style S-Small capitals|that}} is Non-“ being,” in the sense that it is the one {{Style S-Small capitals|be-ness}} ; for, in this {{Style S-Small capitals|all}} lies concealed its coeternal and coeval emanation or inherent radiation, which, upon becoming periodically Brahma (the male-female Potency) becomes or expands itself into the manifested Universe. Narayana moving on the (abstract) waters of Space, is transformed into the Waters of concrete substance moved by him, who now becomes the manifested {{Style S-Small capitals|word}} or Logos. | Therefore, when the Pantheists echo the Upanishads, which state, as in the Secret Doctrine, that “ this ” cannot create, they do not deny a Creator, or rather a ''collective aggregate'' of creators, but only refuse, very logically, to attribute “ creation ” and especially formation, something finite, to an Infinite Principle. With them, Parabrahmam is a passive because an Absolute Cause, the unconditioned ''Mukta.'' It is only limited Omniscience and Omnipotence that are refused to the latter, because these are still attributes (as reflected in man’s perceptions) ; and because Parabrahm, being the “ Supreme {{Style S-Small capitals|all}},” the ever invisible spirit and Soul of Nature, changeless and eternal, can have no attributes ; absoluteness very naturally precluding any idea of the finite or conditioned from being connected with it. And if the Vedantin postulates attributes as belonging simply to its emanation, calling it “ Iswara ''plus'' Maya,” and Avidya (Agnosticism and Nescience rather than ignorance), it is difficult to find any Atheism in this conception. † Since there can be neither two {{Style S-Small capitals|infinites}} nor two {{Style S-Small capitals|absolutes}} in a Universe supposed to be Boundless, this Self-Existence can hardly be conceived of as creating personally. In the sense and perceptions of finite “ Beings,” {{Style S-Small capitals|that}} is Non-“ being,” in the sense that it is the one {{Style S-Small capitals|be-ness}} ; for, in this {{Style S-Small capitals|all}} lies concealed its coeternal and coeval emanation or inherent radiation, which, upon becoming periodically Brahma (the male-female Potency) becomes or expands itself into the manifested Universe. Narayana moving on the (abstract) waters of Space, is transformed into the Waters of concrete substance moved by him, who now becomes the manifested {{Style S-Small capitals|word}} or Logos. | ||
Line 108: | Line 106: | ||
{{Page|9|proem.}} | {{Page|9|proem.}} | ||
return to, Brahma (Brahmâ): ” for Brahma (neuter), the unmanifested, is that Universe ''in abscondito,'' and Brahma, the manifested, is the Logos, made male-female * in the symbolical orthodox dogmas. The God of the Apostle-Initiate and of the Rishi being both the Unseen and the Visible {{Style S-Small capitals|space}}. Space is called in the esoteric symbolism “ the SevenSkinned Eternal Mother-Father.” It is composed from its undifferentiated to its differentiated surface of seven layers. | {{Style P-No indent|return to, Brahma (Brahmâ): ” for Brahma (neuter), the unmanifested, is that Universe ''in abscondito,'' and Brahma, the manifested, is the Logos, made male-female * in the symbolical orthodox dogmas. The God of the Apostle-Initiate and of the Rishi being both the Unseen and the Visible {{Style S-Small capitals|space}}. Space is called in the esoteric symbolism “ the SevenSkinned Eternal Mother-Father.” It is composed from its undifferentiated to its differentiated surface of seven layers.}} | ||
“ What is that which was, is, and will be, whether there is a Universe or not ; whether there be gods or none ? ” asks the esoteric Senzar Catechism. And the answer made is — {{Style S-Small capitals|space}}. | “ What is that which was, is, and will be, whether there is a Universe or not ; whether there be gods or none ? ” asks the esoteric Senzar Catechism. And the answer made is — {{Style S-Small capitals|space}}. | ||
Line 124: | Line 122: | ||
{{Footnotes end}} | {{Footnotes end}} | ||
{{Page| | {{Page|10|proem.}} | ||
accepts revelation as coming from divine yet still finite Beings, the manifested lives, never from the Unmanifestable {{Style S-Small capitals|one life}}; from those entities, called Primordial Man, Dhyani-Buddhas, or Dhyan-Chohans, the “ Rishi-Prajâpati ” of the Hindus, the Elohim or “ Sons of God,” the Planetary Spirits of all nations, who have become Gods for men. He also regards the Adi-Sakti — the direct emanation of Mulaprakriti, the eternal Root of {{Style S-Small capitals|that}}, and the female aspect of the Creative Cause Brahma, in her A’kásic form of the Universal Soul — as philosophically a Maya, and cause of human Maya. But this view does not prevent him from believing in its existence so long as it lasts, to wit, for one Maha- manvantara; nor from applying A’kâśa, the radiation of Mulaprakriti, * to practical purposes, connected as the World-Soul is with all natural phenomena, known or unknown to science. | {{Style P-No indent|accepts revelation as coming from divine yet still finite Beings, the manifested lives, never from the Unmanifestable {{Style S-Small capitals|one life}}; from those entities, called Primordial Man, Dhyani-Buddhas, or Dhyan-Chohans, the “ Rishi-Prajâpati ” of the Hindus, the Elohim or “ Sons of God,” the Planetary Spirits of all nations, who have become Gods for men. He also regards the Adi-Sakti — the direct emanation of Mulaprakriti, the eternal Root of {{Style S-Small capitals|that}}, and the female aspect of the Creative Cause Brahma, in her A’kásic form of the Universal Soul — as philosophically a Maya, and cause of human Maya. But this view does not prevent him from believing in its existence so long as it lasts, to wit, for one Maha- manvantara; nor from applying A’kâśa, the radiation of Mulaprakriti, * to practical purposes, connected as the World-Soul is with all natural phenomena, known or unknown to science.}} | ||
The oldest religions of the world—exoterically, for the esoteric root or foundation is one — are the Indian, the Mazdean, and the Egyptian. Then comes the Chaldean, the outcome of these — entirely lost to the world now, except in its disfigured Sabeanism as at present rendered by the archeologists; then, passing over a number of religions that will be mentioned later, comes the Jewish, esoterically, as in the Kabala, following in the line of Babylonian Magism; exoterically, as in Genesis and the Pentateuch, a collection of allegorical legends. Read by the light of the Zohar, the initial four chapters of Genesis are the fragment | The oldest religions of the world—exoterically, for the esoteric root or foundation is one — are the Indian, the Mazdean, and the Egyptian. Then comes the Chaldean, the outcome of these — entirely lost to the world now, except in its disfigured Sabeanism as at present rendered by the archeologists; then, passing over a number of religions that will be mentioned later, comes the Jewish, esoterically, as in the Kabala, following in the line of Babylonian Magism; exoterically, as in Genesis and the Pentateuch, a collection of allegorical legends. Read by the light of the Zohar, the initial four chapters of Genesis are the fragment | ||
Line 138: | Line 136: | ||
{{Page|11|proem.}} | {{Page|11|proem.}} | ||
of a highly philosophical page in the World’s Cosmogony. (''See'' Book III., ''Gupta Vidya and the Zohar.)'' Left in their symbolical disguise, they are a nursery tale, an ugly thorn in the side of science and logic, an evident effect of Karma. To have let them serve as a prologue to Christianity was a cruel revenge on the part of the Rabbis, who knew better what their Pentateuch meant. It was a silent protest against their spoliation, and the Jews have certainly now the better of their traditional persecutors. The above-named exoteric creeds will be explained in the light of the Universal doctrine as we proceed with it. | {{Style P-No indent|of a highly philosophical page in the World’s Cosmogony. (''See'' Book III., ''Gupta Vidya and the Zohar.)'' Left in their symbolical disguise, they are a nursery tale, an ugly thorn in the side of science and logic, an evident effect of Karma. To have let them serve as a prologue to Christianity was a cruel revenge on the part of the Rabbis, who knew better what their Pentateuch meant. It was a silent protest against their spoliation, and the Jews have certainly now the better of their traditional persecutors. The above-named exoteric creeds will be explained in the light of the Universal doctrine as we proceed with it.}} | ||
The Occult Catechism contains the following questions and answers: | The Occult Catechism contains the following questions and answers: | ||
Line 156: | Line 154: | ||
{{Page|12|the secret doctrine.}} | {{Page|12|the secret doctrine.}} | ||
{{Style P-Quote|''contracts ''(''exhalation and inhalation'')''. When it expands the mother diffuses and scatters; when it contracts, the mother draws back and ingathers. This produces the periods of Evolution and Dissolution, Manwantara and Pralaya. The Germ is invisible and fiery; the Root ''(''the plane of the circle'')'' is cool '';'' but during Evolution and Manwantara her garment is cold and radiant. Hot Breath is the Father who devours the progeny of the many-faced Element ''(''heterogeneous'')'' ; and leaves the single-faced ones ''(''homogeneous'')''. Cool Breath is the Mother, who conceives, forms, brings forth, and receives them back into her bosom, to reform them at the Dawn ''(''of the Day of Brahma, or Manvantara'')''. . . . .”}} | {{Style P-Quote|{{Style P-No indent|''contracts ''(''exhalation and inhalation'')''. When it expands the mother diffuses and scatters; when it contracts, the mother draws back and ingathers. This produces the periods of Evolution and Dissolution, Manwantara and Pralaya. The Germ is invisible and fiery; the Root ''(''the plane of the circle'')'' is cool '';'' but during Evolution and Manwantara her garment is cold and radiant. Hot Breath is the Father who devours the progeny of the many-faced Element ''(''heterogeneous'')'' ; and leaves the single-faced ones ''(''homogeneous'')''. Cool Breath is the Mother, who conceives, forms, brings forth, and receives them back into her bosom, to reform them at the Dawn ''(''of the Day of Brahma, or Manvantara'')''. . . . .”}}}} | ||
For clearer understanding on the part of the general reader, it must be stated that Occult Science recognises ''Seven'' Cosmical Elements — four entirely physical, and the fifth (Ether) semi-material, as it will become visible in the air towards the end of our Fourth Round, to reign supreme over the others during the whole of the Fifth. The remaining two are as yet absolutely beyond the range of human perception. These latter will, however, appear as presentments during the 6th and 7th Races of this Round, and will become known in the 6th and 7th Rounds respectively. * These seven elements with their numberless Sub-Elements | For clearer understanding on the part of the general reader, it must be stated that Occult Science recognises ''Seven'' Cosmical Elements — four entirely physical, and the fifth (Ether) semi-material, as it will become visible in the air towards the end of our Fourth Round, to reign supreme over the others during the whole of the Fifth. The remaining two are as yet absolutely beyond the range of human perception. These latter will, however, appear as presentments during the 6th and 7th Races of this Round, and will become known in the 6th and 7th Rounds respectively. * These seven elements with their numberless Sub-Elements | ||
Line 168: | Line 166: | ||
{{Page|13|proem.}} | {{Page|13|proem.}} | ||
far more numerous than those known to Science) are simply ''conditional ''modifications and aspects of the {{Style S-Small capitals|one}} and only Element. This latter is not ''Ether'', * not even ''A’kâśa'' but the ''Source'' of these. The Fifth Element, now advocated quite freely by Science, is not the Ether hypothesised by Sir Isaac Newton — although he calls it by that name, having associated it in his mind probably with the Æther, “ Father-Mother ” of Antiquity. As Newton intuitionally says, “ Nature is a perpetual circulatory worker, generating fluids out of solids, fixed things out of volatile, and volatile out of fixed, subtile out of gross, and gross out of subtile. . . . . Thus, perhaps, may all things be originated from Ether,” (Hypoth, 1675). | {{Style P-No indent|far more numerous than those known to Science) are simply ''conditional ''modifications and aspects of the {{Style S-Small capitals|one}} and only Element. This latter is not ''Ether'', * not even ''A’kâśa'' but the ''Source'' of these. The Fifth Element, now advocated quite freely by Science, is not the Ether hypothesised by Sir Isaac Newton — although he calls it by that name, having associated it in his mind probably with the Æther, “ Father-Mother ” of Antiquity. As Newton intuitionally says, “ Nature is a perpetual circulatory worker, generating fluids out of solids, fixed things out of volatile, and volatile out of fixed, subtile out of gross, and gross out of subtile. . . . . Thus, perhaps, may all things be originated from Ether,” (Hypoth, 1675).}} | ||
The reader has to bear in mind that the Stanzas given treat only of the Cosmogony of our own planetary System and what is visible around it, after a Solar Pralaya. The secret teachings with regard to the Evolution of the Universal Kosmos cannot be given, since they could not be understood by the highest minds in this age, and there seem to be very few Initiates, even among the greatest, who are allowed to speculate upon this subject. Moreover the Teachers say openly that not even the highest Dhyani-Chohans have ever penetrated the mysteries beyond those boundaries that separate the milliards of Solar systems from the “ Central Sun,” as it is called. Therefore, that which is given, relates only to our visible Kosmos, after a “ Night of Brahmâ.” | The reader has to bear in mind that the Stanzas given treat only of the Cosmogony of our own planetary System and what is visible around it, after a Solar Pralaya. The secret teachings with regard to the Evolution of the Universal Kosmos cannot be given, since they could not be understood by the highest minds in this age, and there seem to be very few Initiates, even among the greatest, who are allowed to speculate upon this subject. Moreover the Teachers say openly that not even the highest Dhyani-Chohans have ever penetrated the mysteries beyond those boundaries that separate the milliards of Solar systems from the “ Central Sun,” as it is called. Therefore, that which is given, relates only to our visible Kosmos, after a “ Night of Brahmâ.” | ||
Line 198: | Line 196: | ||
{{Page|15|proem.}} | {{Page|15|proem.}} | ||
the Kosmos is the pure noumenon of thought. This advance on his part brings him very near to the esoteric and Vedantin tenet. * | {{Style P-No indent|the Kosmos is the pure noumenon of thought. This advance on his part brings him very near to the esoteric and Vedantin tenet. *}} | ||
Parabrahm (the One Reality, the Absolute) is the field of Absolute Consciousness, ''i.e.,'' that Essence which is out of all relation to conditioned existence, and of which conscious existence is a conditioned symbol. But once that we pass in thought from this (to us) Absolute Negation, duality supervenes in the contrast of Spirit (or consciousness) and Matter, Subject and Object. | Parabrahm (the One Reality, the Absolute) is the field of Absolute Consciousness, ''i.e.,'' that Essence which is out of all relation to conditioned existence, and of which conscious existence is a conditioned symbol. But once that we pass in thought from this (to us) Absolute Negation, duality supervenes in the contrast of Spirit (or consciousness) and Matter, Subject and Object. | ||
Line 222: | Line 220: | ||
{{Page|16|the secret doctrine.}} | {{Page|16|the secret doctrine.}} | ||
But just as the opposite poles of subject and object, spirit and matter, are but aspects of the One Unity in which they are synthesized, so, in the manifested Universe, there is “ that ” which links spirit to matter, subject to object. | {{Style P-No indent|But just as the opposite poles of subject and object, spirit and matter, are but aspects of the One Unity in which they are synthesized, so, in the manifested Universe, there is “ that ” which links spirit to matter, subject to object.}} | ||
This something, at present unknown to Western speculation, is called by the occultists Fohat. It is the “ bridge ” by which the “ Ideas ” existing in the “ Divine Thought ” are impressed on Cosmic substance as the “ laws of Nature.” Fohat is thus the dynamic energy of Cosmic Ideation; or, regarded from the other side, it is the intelligent medium, the guiding power of all manifestation, the “ Thought Divine ” transmitted and made manifest through the Dhyan Chohans, * the Architects of the visible World. Thus from Spirit, or Cosmic Ideation, comes our consciousness ; from Cosmic Substance the several vehicles in which that consciousness is individualised and attains to self — or reflective — consciousness; while Fohat, in its various manifestations, is the mysterious link between Mind and Matter, the animating principle electrifying every atom into life. | This something, at present unknown to Western speculation, is called by the occultists Fohat. It is the “ bridge ” by which the “ Ideas ” existing in the “ Divine Thought ” are impressed on Cosmic substance as the “ laws of Nature.” Fohat is thus the dynamic energy of Cosmic Ideation; or, regarded from the other side, it is the intelligent medium, the guiding power of all manifestation, the “ Thought Divine ” transmitted and made manifest through the Dhyan Chohans, * the Architects of the visible World. Thus from Spirit, or Cosmic Ideation, comes our consciousness ; from Cosmic Substance the several vehicles in which that consciousness is individualised and attains to self — or reflective — consciousness; while Fohat, in its various manifestations, is the mysterious link between Mind and Matter, the animating principle electrifying every atom into life. | ||
Line 250: | Line 248: | ||
{{Page|17|proem.}} | {{Page|17|proem.}} | ||
of the Eye of Self-Existence (Book of Dzyan.) “ The appearance and disappearance of Worlds is like a regular tidal ebb of flux and reflux.” (See Part II., “ Days and Nights of Brahmâ.”) | {{Style P-No indent|of the Eye of Self-Existence (Book of Dzyan.) “ The appearance and disappearance of Worlds is like a regular tidal ebb of flux and reflux.” (See Part II., “ Days and Nights of Brahmâ.”)}} | ||
This second assertion of the Secret Doctrine is the absolute universality of that law of periodicity, of flux and reflux, ebb and flow, which physical science has observed and recorded in all departments of nature. An alternation such as that of Day and Night, Life and Death, Sleeping and Waking, is a fact so common, so perfectly universal and without exception, that it is easy to comprehend that in it we see one of the absolutely fundamental laws of the universe. | This second assertion of the Secret Doctrine is the absolute universality of that law of periodicity, of flux and reflux, ebb and flow, which physical science has observed and recorded in all departments of nature. An alternation such as that of Day and Night, Life and Death, Sleeping and Waking, is a fact so common, so perfectly universal and without exception, that it is easy to comprehend that in it we see one of the absolutely fundamental laws of the universe. | ||
Line 264: | Line 262: | ||
{{Page|18|the secret doctrine.}} | {{Page|18|the secret doctrine.}} | ||
antiphrasis as illusive and Mayavic. For although the root of every atom individually and of every form collectively, is that seventh principle or the one Reality, still, in its manifested phenomenal and temporary appearance, it is no better than an evanescent illusion of our senses. (See, for clearer definition, Addendum “ Gods, Monads and Atoms,” and also “ Theophania,” “ Bodhisatvas and Reincarnation,” etc., etc.) | {{Style P-No indent|antiphrasis as illusive and Mayavic. For although the root of every atom individually and of every form collectively, is that seventh principle or the one Reality, still, in its manifested phenomenal and temporary appearance, it is no better than an evanescent illusion of our senses. (See, for clearer definition, Addendum “ Gods, Monads and Atoms,” and also “ Theophania,” “ Bodhisatvas and Reincarnation,” etc., etc.)}} | ||
In its absoluteness, the One Principle under its two aspects (of Parabrahmam and Mulaprakriti) is sexless, unconditioned and eternal. Its periodical (manvantaric) emanation — or primal radiation — is also One, androgynous and phenomenally finite. When the radiation radiates in its turn, all its radiations are also androgynous, to become male and female principles in their lower aspects. After Pralaya, whether the great or the minor Pralaya (the latter leaving the worlds in ''statu quo'' *), the first that re-awakes to active life is the plastic A’kâśa, Father-Mother, the Spirit and Soul of Ether, or the plane on the surface of the Circle. Space is called the “ Mother ” before its Cosmic activity, and Father-Mother at the first stage of re-awakening. (See Comments, Stanza II.) In the Kabala it is also Father-Mother-Son. But whereas in the Eastern doctrine, these are the Seventh Principle of the manifested Universe, or its “ Atma-Buddhi-Manas ” (Spirit, Soul, Intelligence), the triad branching off and dividing into the seven cosmical and seven human principles, in the Western Kabala of the Christian mystics it is the Triad or Trinity, and with their occultists, the male-female Jehovah, Jah-Havah. In this lies the whole difference between the esoteric and the Christian trinities. The Mystics and the Philosophers, the Eastern and Western Pantheists, synthesize their pregenetic triad in the pure divine abstraction. The orthodox, anthropomorphize it. ''Hiranyagarbha, Hari,'' and ''Sankara'' — the three hypostases of the manifesting “ Spirit of the Supreme Spirit ” (by which title Prithivi — the Earth — greets Vishnu in his first Avatar) — are the purely metaphysical abstract qualities of formation, preservation, and destruction, and are the three divine Avasthas (lit. hypostases) of that which “ does | In its absoluteness, the One Principle under its two aspects (of Parabrahmam and Mulaprakriti) is sexless, unconditioned and eternal. Its periodical (manvantaric) emanation — or primal radiation — is also One, androgynous and phenomenally finite. When the radiation radiates in its turn, all its radiations are also androgynous, to become male and female principles in their lower aspects. After Pralaya, whether the great or the minor Pralaya (the latter leaving the worlds in ''statu quo'' *), the first that re-awakes to active life is the plastic A’kâśa, Father-Mother, the Spirit and Soul of Ether, or the plane on the surface of the Circle. Space is called the “ Mother ” before its Cosmic activity, and Father-Mother at the first stage of re-awakening. (See Comments, Stanza II.) In the Kabala it is also Father-Mother-Son. But whereas in the Eastern doctrine, these are the Seventh Principle of the manifested Universe, or its “ Atma-Buddhi-Manas ” (Spirit, Soul, Intelligence), the triad branching off and dividing into the seven cosmical and seven human principles, in the Western Kabala of the Christian mystics it is the Triad or Trinity, and with their occultists, the male-female Jehovah, Jah-Havah. In this lies the whole difference between the esoteric and the Christian trinities. The Mystics and the Philosophers, the Eastern and Western Pantheists, synthesize their pregenetic triad in the pure divine abstraction. The orthodox, anthropomorphize it. ''Hiranyagarbha, Hari,'' and ''Sankara'' — the three hypostases of the manifesting “ Spirit of the Supreme Spirit ” (by which title Prithivi — the Earth — greets Vishnu in his first Avatar) — are the purely metaphysical abstract qualities of formation, preservation, and destruction, and are the three divine Avasthas (lit. hypostases) of that which “ does | ||
Line 274: | Line 272: | ||
{{Page|19|proem.}} | {{Page|19|proem.}} | ||
not perish with created things ” (or Achyuta, a name of Vishnu) ; whereas the orthodox Christian separates his personal creative Deity into the three personages of the Trinity, and admits of no higher Deity. The latter, in Occultism, is the abstract Triangle ; with the orthodox, the perfect Cube. The creative god or the aggregate gods are regarded by the Eastern philosopher as ''Bhrantidarsanatah'' — “ false apprehension,” something “ conceived of, by reason of erroneous appearances, as a material form,” and explained as arising from the illusive conception of the Egotistic personal and human Soul (lower fifth principle). It is beautifully expressed in a new translation of Vishnu Purâna. “ That Brahmâ in its totality has essentially the aspect of Prakriti, both evolved and unevolved (Mulaprakriti), and also the aspect of Spirit and the aspect of Time. Spirit, O twice born, is the leading aspect of the Supreme Brahma. * The next is a twofold aspect, — Prakriti, both evolved and unevolved, and is the time last.” Kronos is shown in the Orphic theogony as being also a generated god or agent. | {{Style P-No indent|not perish with created things ” (or Achyuta, a name of Vishnu) ; whereas the orthodox Christian separates his personal creative Deity into the three personages of the Trinity, and admits of no higher Deity. The latter, in Occultism, is the abstract Triangle ; with the orthodox, the perfect Cube. The creative god or the aggregate gods are regarded by the Eastern philosopher as ''Bhrantidarsanatah'' — “ false apprehension,” something “ conceived of, by reason of erroneous appearances, as a material form,” and explained as arising from the illusive conception of the Egotistic personal and human Soul (lower fifth principle). It is beautifully expressed in a new translation of Vishnu Purâna. “ That Brahmâ in its totality has essentially the aspect of Prakriti, both evolved and unevolved (Mulaprakriti), and also the aspect of Spirit and the aspect of Time. Spirit, O twice born, is the leading aspect of the Supreme Brahma. * The next is a twofold aspect, — Prakriti, both evolved and unevolved, and is the time last.” Kronos is shown in the Orphic theogony as being also a generated god or agent.}} | ||
At this stage of the re-awakening of the Universe, the sacred symbolism represents it as a perfect Circle with the (root) point in the Centre. This sign was universal, therefore we find it in the Kabala also. The Western Kabala, however, now in the hands of Christian mystics, ignores it altogether, though it is plainly shown in the Zohar. These sectarians begin at the end, and show as the symbol of pregenetic Kosmos this sign [[File:sd-circle_with_cross.jpg|x25px]], calling it “ the Union of the Rose and Cross,” the great mystery of occult generation, from whence the name — Rosicrucians (Rose Cross) ! | At this stage of the re-awakening of the Universe, the sacred symbolism represents it as a perfect Circle with the (root) point in the Centre. This sign was universal, therefore we find it in the Kabala also. The Western Kabala, however, now in the hands of Christian mystics, ignores it altogether, though it is plainly shown in the Zohar. These sectarians begin at the end, and show as the symbol of pregenetic Kosmos this sign [[File:sd-circle_with_cross.jpg|x25px]], calling it “ the Union of the Rose and Cross,” the great mystery of occult generation, from whence the name — Rosicrucians (Rose Cross) ! | ||
Line 286: | Line 284: | ||
{{Page|20|the secret doctrine.}} | {{Page|20|the secret doctrine.}} | ||
Secret Doctrine. Brahma (neuter) is called Kalahansa, meaning, as explained by Western Orientalists, the Eternal Swan or goose (see Stanza 111., Comment. 8), and so is Brahmâ, the Creator. A great mistake is thus brought under notice ; it is Brahma (neuter) who ought to be referred to as Hansa-vahana (He who uses the swan as his Vehicle) and not Brahmâ the Creator, who is the real Kalahansa, while Brahma (neuter) is hamsa, and “ A-hamsa,” as will be explained in the Commentary. Let it be understood that the terms Brahmâ and Para-brahmam are not used here because they belong to our Esoteric nomenclature, but simply because they are more familiar to the students in the West. Both are the perfect equivalents of our one, three, and seven vowelled terms, which stand for the {{Style S-Small capitals|One All}}, and the One “ All in all.” | {{Style P-No indent|Secret Doctrine. Brahma (neuter) is called Kalahansa, meaning, as explained by Western Orientalists, the Eternal Swan or goose (see Stanza 111., Comment. 8), and so is Brahmâ, the Creator. A great mistake is thus brought under notice ; it is Brahma (neuter) who ought to be referred to as Hansa-vahana (He who uses the swan as his Vehicle) and not Brahmâ the Creator, who is the real Kalahansa, while Brahma (neuter) is hamsa, and “ A-hamsa,” as will be explained in the Commentary. Let it be understood that the terms Brahmâ and Para-brahmam are not used here because they belong to our Esoteric nomenclature, but simply because they are more familiar to the students in the West. Both are the perfect equivalents of our one, three, and seven vowelled terms, which stand for the {{Style S-Small capitals|One All}}, and the One “ All in all.”}} | ||
Such are the basic conceptions on which the Secret Doctrine rests. | Such are the basic conceptions on which the Secret Doctrine rests. | ||
Line 301: | Line 299: | ||
{{Page|21|proem.}} | {{Page|21|proem.}} | ||
that of the chain of planets of which that earth forms one, to the solar Universe to which that chain belongs, and so on, in an ascending scale, till the mind reels and is exhausted in the effort. | {{Style P-No indent|that of the chain of planets of which that earth forms one, to the solar Universe to which that chain belongs, and so on, in an ascending scale, till the mind reels and is exhausted in the effort.}} | ||
The seven Stanzas given in this volume represent the seven terms of this abstract formula. They refer to, and describe the seven great stages of the evolutionary process, which are spoken of in the Puranas as the “ Seven Creations,” and in the Bible as the “ Days ” of Creation. | The seven Stanzas given in this volume represent the seven terms of this abstract formula. They refer to, and describe the seven great stages of the evolutionary process, which are spoken of in the Puranas as the “ Seven Creations,” and in the Bible as the “ Days ” of Creation. | ||
Line 311: | Line 309: | ||
A moment’s thought shows that such a state can only be symbolised; to describe it is impossible. Nor can it be symbolised except in negatives; for, since it is the state of Absoluteness ''per se,'' it can possess none of those specific attributes which serve us to describe objects in positive terms. Hence that state can only be suggested by the negatives of all those most abstract attributes which men feel rather than conceive, as the remotest limits attainable by their power of conception. | A moment’s thought shows that such a state can only be symbolised; to describe it is impossible. Nor can it be symbolised except in negatives; for, since it is the state of Absoluteness ''per se,'' it can possess none of those specific attributes which serve us to describe objects in positive terms. Hence that state can only be suggested by the negatives of all those most abstract attributes which men feel rather than conceive, as the remotest limits attainable by their power of conception. | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | |||
The stage described in Stanza II. is, to a western mind, so nearly identical with that mentioned in the first Stanza, that to express the idea of its difference would require a treatise in itself. Hence it must be left to the intuition and the higher faculties of the reader to grasp, as far as he can, the meaning of the allegorical phrases used. Indeed it must be remembered that all these Stanzas appeal to the inner faculties rather than to the ordinary comprehension of the physical brain. | The stage described in Stanza II. is, to a western mind, so nearly identical with that mentioned in the first Stanza, that to express the idea of its difference would require a treatise in itself. Hence it must be left to the intuition and the higher faculties of the reader to grasp, as far as he can, the meaning of the allegorical phrases used. Indeed it must be remembered that all these Stanzas appeal to the inner faculties rather than to the ordinary comprehension of the physical brain. | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | |||
Stanza III. describes the Re-awakening of the Universe to life after Pralaya. It depicts the emergence of the “ Monads ” from thei state of absorption within the one ; the earliest and highest stage in the formation of “ Worlds,” the term Monad being one which may apply equally to the vastest Solar System or the tiniest atom. | Stanza III. describes the Re-awakening of the Universe to life after Pralaya. It depicts the emergence of the “ Monads ” from thei state of absorption within the one ; the earliest and highest stage in the formation of “ Worlds,” the term Monad being one which may apply equally to the vastest Solar System or the tiniest atom. | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | |||
Stanza IV. shows the differentiation of the “ Germ ” of the Universe | Stanza IV. shows the differentiation of the “ Germ ” of the Universe | ||
{{Page|22|the secret doctrine.}} | {{Page|22|the secret doctrine.}} | ||
into the septenary hierarchy of conscious Divine Powers, who are the active manifestations of the One Supreme Energy. They are the framers, shapers, and ultimately the creators of all the manifested Universe, in the only sense in which the name “ Creator ” is intelligible ; they inform and guide it ; they are the intelligent Beings who adjust and control evolution, embodying in themselves those manifestations of the one law, which we know as “ The Laws of Nature.” | {{Style P-No indent|into the septenary hierarchy of conscious Divine Powers, who are the active manifestations of the One Supreme Energy. They are the framers, shapers, and ultimately the creators of all the manifested Universe, in the only sense in which the name “ Creator ” is intelligible ; they inform and guide it ; they are the intelligent Beings who adjust and control evolution, embodying in themselves those manifestations of the one law, which we know as “ The Laws of Nature.”}} | ||
Generically, they are known as the Dhyan Chohans, though each of the various groups has its own designation in the Secret Doctrine. | Generically, they are known as the Dhyan Chohans, though each of the various groups has its own designation in the Secret Doctrine. | ||
Line 328: | Line 326: | ||
This stage of evolution is spoken of in Hindu mythology as the “ Creation ” of the Gods. | This stage of evolution is spoken of in Hindu mythology as the “ Creation ” of the Gods. | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | |||
In Stanza V. the process of world-formation is described : — First, diffused Cosmic Matter, then the fiery “ whirlwind,” the first stage in the formation of a nebula. That nebula condenses, and after passing through various transformations, forms a Solar Universe, a planetary chain, or a single planet, as the case may be. | In Stanza V. the process of world-formation is described : — First, diffused Cosmic Matter, then the fiery “ whirlwind,” the first stage in the formation of a nebula. That nebula condenses, and after passing through various transformations, forms a Solar Universe, a planetary chain, or a single planet, as the case may be. | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | |||
The subsequent stages in the formation of a “ World ” are indicated in Stanza VI., which brings the evolution of such a world down to its fourth great period, corresponding to the period in which we are now living. | The subsequent stages in the formation of a “ World ” are indicated in Stanza VI., which brings the evolution of such a world down to its fourth great period, corresponding to the period in which we are now living. | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | |||
Stanza VII. continues the history, tracing the descent of life down to the appearance of Man ; and thus closes the first Book of the Secret Doctrine. | Stanza VII. continues the history, tracing the descent of life down to the appearance of Man ; and thus closes the first Book of the Secret Doctrine. | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | |||
The development of “ Man ” from his first appearance on this earth in this Round to the state in which we now find him will form the subject of Book II. | The development of “ Man ” from his first appearance on this earth in this Round to the state in which we now find him will form the subject of Book II. | ||
Line 348: | Line 346: | ||
{{Page|23|proem.}} | {{Page|23|proem.}} | ||
than useless to make the subject still more difficult by introducing the archaic phraseology of the original, with its puzzling style and words. Extracts are given from the Chinese Thibetan and Sanskrit translations of the original Senzar Commentaries and Glosses on the Book of {{Style S-Small capitals|Dzyan}} — these being now rendered for the first time into a European language. It is almost unnecessary to state that only portions of the seven Stanzas are here given. Were they published complete they would remain incomprehensible to all save the few higher occultists. Nor is there any need to assure the reader that, no more than most of the profane, does the writer, or rather the humble recorder, understand those forbidden passages. To facilitate the reading, and to avoid the too frequent reference to foot-notes, it was thought best to blend together texts and glosses, using the Sanskrit and Tibetan proper names whenever those cannot be avoided, in preference to giving the originals. The more so as the said terms are all accepted synonyms, the former only being used between a Master and his chelas (or disciples). | {{Style P-No indent|than useless to make the subject still more difficult by introducing the archaic phraseology of the original, with its puzzling style and words. Extracts are given from the Chinese Thibetan and Sanskrit translations of the original Senzar Commentaries and Glosses on the Book of {{Style S-Small capitals|Dzyan}} — these being now rendered for the first time into a European language. It is almost unnecessary to state that only portions of the seven Stanzas are here given. Were they published complete they would remain incomprehensible to all save the few higher occultists. Nor is there any need to assure the reader that, no more than most of the profane, does the writer, or rather the humble recorder, understand those forbidden passages. To facilitate the reading, and to avoid the too frequent reference to foot-notes, it was thought best to blend together texts and glosses, using the Sanskrit and Tibetan proper names whenever those cannot be avoided, in preference to giving the originals. The more so as the said terms are all accepted synonyms, the former only being used between a Master and his chelas (or disciples).}} | ||
Thus, were one to translate into English, using only the substantives and technical terms as employed in one of the Tibetan and Senzar versions, Verse 1 would read as follows: — “ Tho-ag in Zhi-gyu slept seven Khorlo. Zodmanas zhiba. All Nyug bosom. Konch-hog not; Thyan- Kam not ; Lha-Chohan not ; Tenbrel Chugnyi not ; Dharmakaya ceased ; Tgenchang not become ; Barnang and Ssa in Ngovonyidj ; alone Tho-og Yinsin in night of Sun-chan and Yong-grub (Parinishpanna), &c., &c.,” which would sound like pure ''Abracadabra.'' | Thus, were one to translate into English, using only the substantives and technical terms as employed in one of the Tibetan and Senzar versions, Verse 1 would read as follows: — “ Tho-ag in Zhi-gyu slept seven Khorlo. Zodmanas zhiba. All Nyug bosom. Konch-hog not; Thyan- Kam not ; Lha-Chohan not ; Tenbrel Chugnyi not ; Dharmakaya ceased ; Tgenchang not become ; Barnang and Ssa in Ngovonyidj ; alone Tho-og Yinsin in night of Sun-chan and Yong-grub (Parinishpanna), &c., &c.,” which would sound like pure ''Abracadabra.'' | ||
Line 356: | Line 354: | ||
{{Page|24|the secret doctrine.}} | {{Page|24|the secret doctrine.}} | ||
''dreamers;'' and, at the worst, as an additional hypothesis to the many Scientific hypotheses past, present and future, some exploded, others still lingering. It is not in any sense worse than are many of the so called Scientific theories ; and it is in every case more philosophical and probable. | {{Style P-No indent|''dreamers;'' and, at the worst, as an additional hypothesis to the many Scientific hypotheses past, present and future, some exploded, others still lingering. It is not in any sense worse than are many of the so called Scientific theories ; and it is in every case more philosophical and probable.}} | ||
In view of the abundant comments and explanations required, the references to the footnotes are given in the usual way, while the sentences to be commented upon are marked with figures. Additional matter will be found in the Chapters on Symbolism forming Part II., as well as in Part III., these being often more full of information than the text. | In view of the abundant comments and explanations required, the references to the footnotes are given in the usual way, while the sentences to be commented upon are marked with figures. Additional matter will be found in the Chapters on Symbolism forming Part II., as well as in Part III., these being often more full of information than the text. | ||
<center>–––––––</center> |