Jump to content

HPB-SB-11-148: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 34: Line 34:
  | type = article
  | type = article
  | status = proofread
  | status = proofread
  | continues =
  | continues =173
  | author = C.C.M.
  | author = C.C.M.
  | title = Adeptship versus Mediumship
  | title = Adeptship versus Mediumship
Line 49: Line 49:
{{Style S-Small capitals| Sir}},—With reference to your note to my last week’s letter, I will endeavour to supplement the latter, as you think I should do, by some further remarks.
{{Style S-Small capitals| Sir}},—With reference to your note to my last week’s letter, I will endeavour to supplement the latter, as you think I should do, by some further remarks.


No phenomenon has ever been recorded as occurring in Madame Blavatsky’s presence, which was not in direct pursuance with her previously declared intention, or for a directly practical purpose. This fact alone proves that the forces employed are either under control, or by some “pre-established harmony, never obtrude themselves when they are not wanted.” You will, perhaps, refer, to the “signal calls” (bell sounds), which are sometimes heard, though not expected, and will say that we are not entitled to accept her explanation, that these are telegraphic calls for her attention, by her invisible adept correspondents. But I submit that when I find a phenomenon perfectly appropriate to its alleged purpose, I am entitled to classify it as occurring for that purpose. Take any medium, or number of mediums, at their strongest power. True it is that the agencies operating, when able, are also sometimes willing to oblige the sitters, and carry out their wishes, though more often the desired test is evaded, and something quite unlooked for, though perhaps as remarkable, is done. Take ''all ''the facts in Mr. Sinnett’s book; you will find none superfluous, none disorderly, but always just that done which is in response to an intelligent exigency. I do not say confidently that any one single phenomenon mentioned in this book ''could ''not occur {{Style S-HPB SB. Restored|through a passive medium, though I doubt whether a long-lost article has ever been thus recovered at request, or a permanent duplication of another article (not an ''apport) ''effected. Have these and similar useful feats ever been performed by spirits, three or four such in a single alter noon, by request, in the light, without any of the usual conditions of a ''stance? ''I think not. But that is not my point, which is, that when all is consistent with the alleged control, and nothing inconsistent, an essential distinction is established between these facts, and the manifestations of mediumship, wherein independent, free agency is ''always ''apparent, and the more apparent, the stronger the force, notwithstanding that the wishes of the medium may sometimes be complied with. I quite agree that in mediumship there is an observable connection between the manifestations and the disposition of the medium; and I am far from saying that a medium may not learn to control some minor phenomena consciously which are commonly accordant with his or her conscious or unconscious desires. That is another question.}}
No phenomenon has ever been recorded as occurring in Madame Blavatsky’s presence, which was not in direct pursuance with her previously declared intention, or for a directly practical purpose. This fact alone proves that the forces employed are either under control, or by some “pre-established harmony, never obtrude themselves when they are not wanted.” You will, perhaps, refer, to the “signal calls” (bell sounds), which are sometimes heard, though not expected, and will say that we are not entitled to accept her explanation, that these are telegraphic calls for her attention, by her invisible adept correspondents. But I submit that when I find a phenomenon perfectly appropriate to its alleged purpose, I am entitled to classify it as occurring for that purpose. Take any medium, or number of mediums, at their strongest power. True it is that the agencies operating, when able, are also sometimes willing to oblige the sitters, and carry out their wishes, though more often the desired test is evaded, and something quite unlooked for, though perhaps as remarkable, is done. Take ''all ''the facts in Mr. Sinnett’s book; you will find none superfluous, none disorderly, but always just that done which is in response to an intelligent exigency. I do not say confidently that any one single phenomenon mentioned in this book ''could ''not occur {{Style S-HPB SB. Continues on|11-173}}  
 
{{Style P-HPB SB. Restored}}
You will, I hope, see now why I decline to select this case or that from Mr. Sinnett’s book as establishing a decisive distinction. As I said before, the book, or great part of it, must itself be studied, if the whole force of the distinction is to be apparent. Further discussion on this subject I must leave to others, unless anything especially requiring notice from myself should be said.
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|C. C. M.}}
 
8th July, 1881.
{{Close div}}


{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}