Jump to content

Blavatsky H.P. - Madame Blavatsky on Fakirs: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:


You may object to the act of disembowelling, which I am compelled to affirm I have seen performed. It is, as you say, “remarkable”; but still not miraculous. Your suggestion that Dr. Hammond should go and see it is a good one. Science would be the gainer, and your humble correspondent be justified. Are you, however, in a position to guarantee that he would furnish the world of skeptics with an example of “veracious reporting,” if his observation should tend to overthrow the pet theories of what we loosely call science?
You may object to the act of disembowelling, which I am compelled to affirm I have seen performed. It is, as you say, “remarkable”; but still not miraculous. Your suggestion that Dr. Hammond should go and see it is a good one. Science would be the gainer, and your humble correspondent be justified. Are you, however, in a position to guarantee that he would furnish the world of skeptics with an example of “veracious reporting,” if his observation should tend to overthrow the pet theories of what we loosely call science?
Yours very respectfully,
 
::::::::Yours very respectfully,
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|H. P. BLAVATSKY.}}
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|H. P. BLAVATSKY.}}
{{Style P-No indent|''New York, March'' 28th, 1877.}}
{{Style P-No indent|''New York, March'' 28th, 1877.}}