Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
12,862
edits
Blavatsky H.P. - Footnote to The Church Congress and Spiritualism: Difference between revisions
Blavatsky H.P. - Footnote to The Church Congress and Spiritualism (view source)
Revision as of 05:28, 25 July 2025
, 25 July 2025no edit summary
m (Pavel Malakhov moved page Blavatsky H.P. - Footnote to “The Church Congress and Spiritualism” to Blavatsky H.P. - Footnote to The Church Congress and Spiritualism) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
{{Style P-Title|FOOTNOTE TO “THE CHURCH CONGRESS AND SPIRITUALISM”}} | {{Style P-Title|FOOTNOTE TO “THE CHURCH CONGRESS AND SPIRITUALISM”}} | ||
{{HPB-CW-comment|view=center|[''The Theosophist'', Vol. III, No. 3, December, 1881, p. 59]}} | |||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
{{HPB-CW-comment|[In an account of certain Spiritualistic phenomena, there occurs the following passage: “The Spirit came up to him and declared most emphatically that it was his brother. Very happily he had not lost a brother. In pursuance of a little plot he had arranged, he squirted over the Spirit some liquid cochineal. . . . At the close of the séance they found that the medium was covered with liquid cochineal. This proved that the Spirit and the medium were one and the same person.” H. P. B. says:]}} | {{HPB-CW-comment|[In an account of certain Spiritualistic phenomena, there occurs the following passage: “The Spirit came up to him and declared most emphatically that it was his brother. Very happily he had not lost a brother. In pursuance of a little plot he had arranged, he squirted over the Spirit some liquid cochineal. . . . At the close of the séance they found that the medium was covered with liquid cochineal. This proved that the Spirit and the medium were one and the same person.” H. P. B. says:]}} | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | |||
It proves nothing of the kind; but simply, that the “animal soul” or the Kama-rupa, the living inner man of the medium, has more to do with the “materializations” than the spirits of “dead” men. | It proves nothing of the kind; but simply, that the “animal soul” or the ''Kama-rupa'', the ''living inner'' man of the medium, has more to do with the “materializations” than the spirits of “dead” men. | ||