Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
12,204
edits
(Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Strange Manifestations | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 4 | pages = 27 | publications = The Theosophist, Vol. III...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Correct Definitions and Incorrect Insinuations | | previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Correct Definitions and Incorrect Insinuations | ||
| next = Blavatsky H.P. - Whipped into Admission | | next = Blavatsky H.P. - Whipped into Admission | ||
| alternatives = | | alternatives = [https://universaltheosophy.com/hpb/strange-manifestations/ UT] | ||
| translations = | | translations = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
{{Style P-Title|STRANGE MANIFESTATIONS}} | {{Style P-Title|STRANGE MANIFESTATIONS}} | ||
{{HPB-CW-comment|view=center|[''The Theosophist'', Vol. III No. 6, March, 1882, pp. 162-163]}} | |||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
<center>To the Editor of The Theosophist.</center> | <center>To the Editor of The Theosophist.</center> | ||
{{Style P-No indent| | {{Style P-No indent|{{Style S-Small capitals|Madame,}}}} | ||
On the last page of No. 4 of Psychic Notes, a correspondent is made to state that he, together with a few friends, | On the last page of No. 4 of ''Psychic Notes'', a correspondent is made to state that he, together with a few friends, “''out of mere curiosity and for the fun of the thing'',” arranged a series of ''séances''. The first was unsuccessful, but the remaining ones were productive of ''proofs innumerable''. And yet none of the parties present was a “conjurer, mesmerist, medium or spiritualist”! | ||
Is this possible? I always thought that the presence of a medium at seances was a necessary condition of manifestations. Or can it be that some one at the séances in question was—if that were possible—an unconscious medium? | Is this possible? I always thought that the presence of a medium at ''seances'' was a necessary condition of manifestations. Or can it be that some one at the ''séances'' in question was—if that were possible—an ''unconscious'' medium? | ||
Your opinion will be highly valued by | Your opinion will be highly valued by | ||
{{Style P- | {{Style P-Align right|Yours obediently,}} | ||
H.}} | {{Style P-Signature in capitals|H.}} | ||
The possible explanation of such manifestations can be found only in one of the following three hypotheses: | The possible explanation of such manifestations can be found only in one of the following three hypotheses: | ||