Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
12,552
edits
Blavatsky H.P. - Funeral Rites Among Savage Races: Difference between revisions
Blavatsky H.P. - Funeral Rites Among Savage Races (view source)
Revision as of 08:16, 9 October 2025
, 9 October 2025no edit summary
(Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Funeral Rites Among Savage Races | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 5 | pages = 104 | publications = The Theosophist...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - A Human Storage Battery | | previous = Blavatsky H.P. - A Human Storage Battery | ||
| next = Blavatsky H.P. - The Teachings of Allan Kardec | | next = Blavatsky H.P. - The Teachings of Allan Kardec | ||
| alternatives = | | alternatives = [https://universaltheosophy.com/hpb/funeral-rites-among-savage-races/ UT] | ||
| translations = | | translations = | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Page aside|104}} | {{Page aside|104}} | ||
{{Style P-Title|FUNERAL RITES AMONG SAVAGE RACES}} | |||
{{ | {{HPB-CW-comment|view=center|[''The Theosophist'', Vol. IV, No. 11(47), August, 1883, p. 281]}} | ||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
In your note to the letter on “The Efficacy of Funeral Ceremonies” (see The Theosophist, June 1883, p. 221), you remark “that very few among the so-called savage primitive races, had or have any funeral rites or ceremonies.” | In your note to the letter on “The Efficacy of Funeral Ceremonies” (see ''The Theosophist'', June 1883, p. 221), you remark “that very few among the so-called savage primitive races, had or have any funeral rites or ceremonies.” | ||
Allow me to point out that the aborigines of the Chota Nagpur plateau have a very ancient custom of erecting large blocks of unhewn stone in memory of their “departed dead.” | Allow me to point out that the aborigines of the Chota Nagpur plateau have a very ancient custom of erecting large blocks of unhewn stone in memory of their “departed dead.” | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
These pillars vary in height from 5 to 15 feet. | These pillars vary in height from 5 to 15 feet. | ||
I append hereto a rough copy of some at a village called Pokuria, 4 miles south of Chaibassa, the highest of which is 8 feet 4 inches above ground. Vide Col. Dalton’s Descriptive Ethnology of Bengal, p. 203. | I append hereto a rough copy of some at a village called Pokuria, 4 miles south of Chaibassa, the highest of which is 8 feet 4 inches above ground. ''Vide'' Col. Dalton’s ''Descriptive Ethnology of Bengal'', p. 203. | ||
{{Style P-Signature|W. D.}} | {{Style P-Signature in capitals|W. D.}} | ||
Editor’s Note.—We are sorry to be unable to reproduce the sketch of the said pillars. But we would observe to our amiable correspondent, that in saying that “very few among the savage primitive races had or have any funeral ceremonies,” we were not thinking of the monoliths, and memorial stones placed on their tombs. The latter cannot be classed with either “rites,” or “ceremonies,” but belong to the various modes of disposing of the dead, and preserving the memory of the seat where they were buried. They entail none of that extravagant expenditure lavished by the Hindus and Parsees as well as by the Roman Catholics and Greeks upon obsequial ceremonies in which human variety forces them to outvie each other in the eyes of their indifferent neighbours, and to satisfy the lucre of their Brahmans and priests, under the alleged penalty of offending their dead—a superstition worthy of, and pardonable in, savages, but wholly unworthy and as unpardonable in the XIXth century, and among civilized nations. | ''Editor’s Note''.—We are sorry to be unable to reproduce the sketch of the said pillars. But we would observe to our amiable correspondent, that in saying that “very few among the savage primitive races had or have any funeral ceremonies,” we were not thinking of the monoliths, and memorial stones placed on their tombs. The latter cannot be classed with either “rites,” or “ceremonies,” but belong to the various modes of disposing of the dead, and preserving the memory of the seat where they were buried. They entail none of that extravagant expenditure lavished by the Hindus and Parsees as well as by the Roman Catholics and Greeks upon obsequial ceremonies in which human variety forces them to outvie each other in the eyes of their indifferent neighbours, and to satisfy the lucre of their Brahmans and priests, under the alleged penalty of offending their dead—a superstition worthy of, and pardonable in, savages, but wholly unworthy and as unpardonable in the XIXth century, and among civilized nations. | ||