Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
12,599
edits
Blavatsky H.P. - Is the Moon Immersed in Matter: Difference between revisions
Blavatsky H.P. - Is the Moon Immersed in Matter (view source)
Revision as of 06:02, 10 October 2025
, 10 October 2025no edit summary
m (Pavel Malakhov moved page Blavatsky H.P. - Is the Moon Immersed in Matter? to Blavatsky H.P. - Is the Moon Immersed in Matter) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Are the Great Nations to be Swept Away in an Hour? | | previous = Blavatsky H.P. - Are the Great Nations to be Swept Away in an Hour? | ||
| next = Blavatsky H.P. - About the Mineral Monad | | next = Blavatsky H.P. - About the Mineral Monad | ||
| alternatives = | | alternatives = [https://universaltheosophy.com/anon/is-the-moon-immersed-in-matter/ UT] | ||
| translations = | | translations = | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Page aside continues|171}} | {{Page aside continues|171}} | ||
{{Style P-Title|QUESTION IV.}} | {{Style P-Title|QUESTION IV.}} | ||
{{Style P-Subtitle|IS THE MOON IMMERSED IN MATTER?}} | |||
{{Vertical space|}} | {{Vertical space|}} | ||
No “Adept,” so far as the writers know, has ever given to “Lay Chela” his “views of the moon,” for publication. With Selenography, modern science is far better acquainted than any humble Asiatic ascetic may ever hope to become. It is to be feared the speculations on pp. 104 and 105 of Esoteric Buddhism, besides being hazy, are somewhat premature. Therefore, it may be as well to pass on to—[Reply No. 5] | No “Adept,” so far as the writers know, has ever given to “Lay Chela” his “views of the moon,” for publication. With Selenography, modern science is far better acquainted than any humble Asiatic ascetic may ever hope to become. It is to be feared the speculations on pp. 104 and 105 of ''Esoteric Buddhism'', besides being hazy, are somewhat premature. Therefore, it may be as well to pass on to—[Reply No. 5] | ||