Jump to content

Blavatsky H.P. - The Crucifixion of Man: Difference between revisions

Blavatsky H.P. - The Crucifixion of Man (view source)

Revision as of 09:41, 30 January 2026

17 bytes removed ,  30 January
m
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = The Crucifixion of Man | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 9 | pages = 264-275 | publications = Lucifer, Vol. II, No....")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
  | previous    = Blavatsky H.P. - Footnotes to “The Sraddha”
  | previous    = Blavatsky H.P. - Footnotes to “The Sraddha”
  | next        = Blavatsky H.P. - Is this an Error? (August, 1888)
  | next        = Blavatsky H.P. - Is this an Error? (August, 1888)
  | alternatives = [https://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v9/y1888_038.htm KH]
  | alternatives =  
  | translations = [https://ru.teopedia.org/lib/Блаватская_Е.П._-_Распятие_человека Russian]
  | translations = [https://ru.teopedia.org/lib/Блаватская_Е.П._-_Распятие_человека Russian]
}}
}}
Line 15: Line 15:


{{Style P-Title|THE CRUCIFIXION OF MAN}}
{{Style P-Title|THE CRUCIFIXION OF MAN}}
{{Vertical space|}}


<center>[Lucifer, Vol. II, No. 9, May, 1888, pp. 243-250]</center>
{{HPB-CW-comment|view=center|[''Lucifer'', Vol. II, No. 9, May, 1888, pp. 243-250]}}
{{Vertical space|}}
{{Vertical space|}}


{{Style P-Align right|“Prometheus is the impersonated representative of Idea, or of the same power as Jove, but contemplated as independent, and not immersed in the product,—as law minus the productive energy.”
{{Style P-Epigraph |“Prometheus is the impersonated representative of Idea, or of the same power as Jove, but contemplated as independent, and not immersed in the product,—as law minus the productive energy.”
{{Style P-Signature|—S. T. COLERIDGE.}}}}
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|—S. T. Coleridge.}}}}
{{Vertical space|}}
{{Vertical space|}}


{{Style P-Align right|“In abstracten wie im concreten Monismus ist es Gott selbst, der als absolutes Subject in den eingeschränkten Subjecten das Weltleid trägt, wobei er sich dann auf den Satz berufen kann: Volenti non fit injuria.”
{{Style P-Epigraph |“In abstracten wie im concreten Monismus ist es Gott selbst, der als absolutes Subject in den eingeschränkten Subjecten das Weltleid trägt, wobei er sich dann auf den Satz berufen kann: Volenti non fit injuria.”
{{Style P-Signature|—VON HARTMANN.}}}}
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|—Von Hartmann.}}}}
{{Vertical space|}}
{{Vertical space|}}


{{Style P-Align right|“I know that I hung on a wind-rocked tree, nine whole nights with a spear wounded, and to Odin offered,—myself to myself,—on that tree of which no one knows from what root it springs.”
{{Style P-Epigraph |“I know that I hung on a wind-rocked tree, nine whole nights with a spear wounded, and to Odin offered,—myself to myself,—on that tree of which no one knows from what root it springs.”
{{Style P-Signature|—Odin’s Rune-Song, Edda.<ref>[Hovamol—The Ballad of the High One—Stanza 139.]</ref>}}}}
{{Style P-Align right|—Odin’s Rune-Song, ''Edda''.<ref>{{HPB-CW-comment|[''Hovamol''—The Ballad of the High One—Stanza 139.]}}</ref>}}}}
{{Vertical space|}}
{{Vertical space|}}


Line 109: Line 108:
Where Love is.”
Where Love is.”


{{Style P-Signature|A.J. C.}}
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|A.J. C.}}
{{Style P-No indent|Lucerne, 1 885.}}}}
{{Style P-No indent|Lucerne, 1885.}}}}


{{Vertical space|}}
{{Vertical space|}}
Retrieved from "https://en.teopedia.org/lib/Special:MobileDiff/33716"