Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
34 bytes added ,  01:40, 14 December 2022
+image
Line 4: Line 4:  
  | image = SB-04-063.jpg
 
  | image = SB-04-063.jpg
 
  | notes =
 
  | notes =
| prev =62
+
 
| next =64
   
}}
 
}}
   Line 18: Line 17:  
  | item =1
 
  | item =1
 
  | type = image
 
  | type = image
  | file =
+
  | file = SB-04-063-1.jpg
  | status = wanted
+
| image size = 70px
 +
  | status = ok
 
  | author =
 
  | author =
 
  | title =
 
  | title =
Line 37: Line 37:  
  | status = proofread
 
  | status = proofread
 
  | continues = 64
 
  | continues = 64
  | author =
+
  | author = Blavatsky H.P.
 
  | title = Buddhism in America
 
  | title = Buddhism in America
 
  | subtitle = Some Philological and Theological Remarks from Mme. Blavatsky
 
  | subtitle = Some Philological and Theological Remarks from Mme. Blavatsky
Line 46: Line 46:  
  | original date =
 
  | original date =
 
  | notes =  
 
  | notes =  
 +
| archivist notes = This is published in "A Modern Panarion," p. 112, under its own title.
 
  | categories =
 
  | categories =
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|<u>My answer.</u>|center}}
 
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|<u>My answer.</u>|center}}
{{Style S-HPB SB. Archivist note|This is published in "A Modern Panarion," p. 112, under its own title.|center}}
      
{{Style S-Small capitals|To the Editor of The Sun}} – ''Sir :'' As, in your leading article of May 6th, I am at one moment given credit for knowing something about the religion of the Brahmans and Buddhists, and, anon, of being a pretender of the class of Jacolliot, and even his plagiarist, you will not wonder at my again knocking at your doors for hospitality. This time I write over my own signature, and am responsible, as I am not under other circumstances.
 
{{Style S-Small capitals|To the Editor of The Sun}} – ''Sir :'' As, in your leading article of May 6th, I am at one moment given credit for knowing something about the religion of the Brahmans and Buddhists, and, anon, of being a pretender of the class of Jacolliot, and even his plagiarist, you will not wonder at my again knocking at your doors for hospitality. This time I write over my own signature, and am responsible, as I am not under other circumstances.
Line 62: Line 62:     
M. Textor de Ravisi, a French Catholic Orientalist, and for ten years Governor of Karikal (India), Jacolliot’s bitterest opponent in religious conclusions, fully appreciated the situation. He would have the name spelt Krishna, because (1) most of the statues of this god are black, and Krishna means black; and (2) because the real name of Christna “was Kaneya, or Caneya.” Very well; but black is Krishna. And if not only Jacolliot, but the Brahmans themselves, are not to be allowed to know as much as their European critics, we will call in the aid of Volney and other Orientalists, who show that the Hindu deity’s name is formed from the radical ''Chris'', meaning sacred, as Jacolliot shows {{Style S-HPB SB. Continues on|4-64}}
 
M. Textor de Ravisi, a French Catholic Orientalist, and for ten years Governor of Karikal (India), Jacolliot’s bitterest opponent in religious conclusions, fully appreciated the situation. He would have the name spelt Krishna, because (1) most of the statues of this god are black, and Krishna means black; and (2) because the real name of Christna “was Kaneya, or Caneya.” Very well; but black is Krishna. And if not only Jacolliot, but the Brahmans themselves, are not to be allowed to know as much as their European critics, we will call in the aid of Volney and other Orientalists, who show that the Hindu deity’s name is formed from the radical ''Chris'', meaning sacred, as Jacolliot shows {{Style S-HPB SB. Continues on|4-64}}
 +
 +
 +
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}

Navigation menu