Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
10,278
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: − + − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
}}
}}
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued|(Text in Devanagari)|5-55}}
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued|The High Court of Bombay |5-54}}
...
{{Style P-No indent|So, the decision of the High Court is hereby confirmed.}}
{{HPB-SB-item
| volume = 5
| page = 56
| item = 1
| type = other
| status = wanted
| continues =
| author =
| author signed =
| title = The High Court of Allahabad
| subtitle =
| untitled =
| source title =
| source details =
| publication date =
| original date = 1879-02-05
| translator = Dhananjay Joshi
| notes = The High Court of Allahabad record in Marathi
| categories = Text in Marathi
}}
<center>Judgment Date: February 5 and 13, 1878</center>
<center>Before Hon. Justice Pearson</center>
Chakravartini ... versus ... Ramadheen and others
Penal Code of 1860 Act No. 45 Sections: 71, 146, 319, 323 – Multiple criminal offenses – Causing Riot and Battery.
'''Facts of the Case:''' The appellant prisoners (8 people) for some ulterior motive had a fight with 7 other inmates. Individuals from both parties got physically hurt in the fight. The lower court pronounced the appellants guilty under sections 147 and 323 of the penal code and gave them a sentence accordingly. The Sessions court upheld the decision of the lower court in the appeal. Now the matter is before this High Court.
Judgment of the Hon. High Court: The appellants have submitted the decision from Chakravartini versus Kalachand case but the said decision has considered rioting and battery have been considered as separate offences. Therefore there are separate punishments pronounced. Also Chakravartini versus Hargovind is
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}