HPB-SB-5-56: Difference between revisions

From Teopedia
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
  | publication date =  
  | publication date =  
  | original date = 1879-02-05
  | original date = 1879-02-05
| language = Marathi
  | translator = Dhananjay Joshi
  | translator = Dhananjay Joshi
  | notes = The High Court of Allahabad record in Marathi
  | notes = The High Court of Allahabad record in Marathi

Revision as of 11:53, 14 April 2023

vol. 5, p. 56
from Adyar archives of the International Theosophical Society
vol. 5 (1875-1878). Miscellaneous Scraps from January 1st 1878

Legend

  • HPB note
  • HPB highlighted
  • HPB underlined
  • HPB crossed out
  • <Editors note>
  • <Archivist note>
  • Lost or unclear
  • Restored

<<     >>
engрус


< The High Court of Bombay (continued from page 5-54) >

So, the decision of the High Court is hereby confirmed.


The High Court of Allahabad

Judgment Date: February 5 and 13, 1878
Before Hon. Justice Pearson

Chakravartini ... versus ... Ramadheen and others

Penal Code of 1860 Act No. 45 Sections: 71, 146, 319, 323 – Multiple criminal offenses – Causing Riot and Battery.

Facts of the Case: The appellant prisoners (8 people) for some ulterior motive had a fight with 7 other inmates. Individuals from both parties got physically hurt in the fight. The lower court pronounced the appellants guilty under sections 147 and 323 of the penal code and gave them a sentence accordingly. The Sessions court upheld the decision of the lower court in the appeal. Now the matter is before this High Court.

Judgment of the Hon. High Court: The appellants have submitted the decision from Chakravartini versus Kalachand case but the said decision has considered rioting and battery have been considered as separate offences. Therefore there are separate punishments pronounced. Also Chakravartini versus Hargovind is


Editor's notes

  1. The High Court of Allahabad by unknown author. Translated from Marathi by Dhananjay Joshi. The High Court of Allahabad record in Marathi