Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, trusted
10,278
edits
Changes
no edit summary
}}
}}
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued|The High Court of Bombay |5-54}}
{{Page|192|Transaction Collection.}}
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued|The High Court of Bombay |5-55}}
{{Style P-No indent|So, the decision of the High Court is hereby confirmed.}}
{{Style P-No indent|So, the decision of the High Court is hereby confirmed.}}
| item = 1
| item = 1
| type = other
| type = other
| status = wanted
| status = ok
| continues =
| continues =
| author =
| author =
| publication date =
| publication date =
| original date = 1879-02-05
| original date = 1879-02-05
| language = Marathi
| translator = Dhananjay Joshi
| translator = Dhananjay Joshi
| notes = The High Court of Allahabad record in Marathi
| notes = The High Court of Allahabad record in Marathi
| categories = Text in Marathi
| categories =
}}
}}
<center>Judgment Date: February 5 and 13, 1878</center>
<center>Judgment Date: February 5 and 13, 1878</center>
<center>Before Hon. Justice Pearson</center>
<center>Before Hon. Justice Pearson</center>
<center>Chakravartini ... v/s ... Ramadheen and others</center>
Chakravartini ... versus ... Ramadheen and others
Penal Code of 1860 Act No. 45 Sections: 71, 146, 319, 323 – Multiple criminal offenses – Causing Riot and Battery.
Penal Code of 1860 Act No. 45 Sections: 71, 146, 319, 323 – Multiple criminal offenses – Causing Riot and Battery.
'''Facts of the Case:''' The appellant prisoners (8 people) for some ulterior motive had a fight with 7 other inmates. Individuals from both parties got physically hurt in the fight. The lower court pronounced the appellants guilty under sections 147 and 323 of the penal code and gave them a sentence accordingly. The Sessions court upheld the decision of the lower court in the appeal. Now the matter is before this High Court.
'''Facts of the Case:''' The appellant prisoners (8 people) for some ulterior motive had a fight with 7 other inmates. Individuals from both parties got physically hurt in the fight. The lower court pronounced the appellants guilty under sections 147 and 323 of the penal code and gave them a sentence accordingly. The Sessions court upheld the decision of the lower court in the appeal. Now the matter is before this High Court.
Judgment of the Hon. High Court: The appellants have submitted the decision from Chakravartini versus Kalachand case but the said decision has considered rioting and battery have been considered as separate offences. Therefore there are separate punishments pronounced. Also Chakravartini versus Hargovind is
'''Judgment of the Hon. High Court:''' The appellants have submitted the decision from Chakravartini v/s Kalachand (1) case but the said decision has considered rioting and battery have been considered as separate offences. Therefore there are separate punishments pronounced. Also Chakravartini versus Hargovind (2) is
{{Footnotes start}}
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Han. La. Ri. Allahabad Series. Waĺ., 2, Page 139.
(1) Weekly Report, Case 7, Page 60
(2) High Court Report, Case Info. Article., 3, Page 174.
{{Footnotes end}}
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}