Absoluteness: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{ETG article |term=Absoluteness |person=No |description=When predicated of the UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLE, it denotes an abstract noun, which is more correct and logical than to app...") |
(Switch from ETG article to CTD article template; move full text to Quotes page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{CTD article | ||
|term=Absoluteness | |term=Absoluteness | ||
|person=No | |person=No | ||
|description=When predicated of the UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLE, it denotes an abstract noun, which is more correct and logical than to apply the adjective “absolute ” to that which has neither attributes nor limitations, nor can IT have any. {{ | |description=When predicated of the UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLE, it denotes an abstract noun, which is more correct and logical than to apply the adjective “absolute ” to that which has neither attributes nor limitations, nor can IT have any. {{ctd-source|TG}}. | ||
|quotes=H. P. Blavatsky | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:50, 6 October 2026
Absoluteness
When predicated of the UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLE, it denotes an abstract noun, which is more correct and logical than to apply the adjective “absolute ” to that which has neither attributes nor limitations, nor can IT have any. (TG).
Some links:
- Quotes: H. P. Blavatsky
DATA
To show: ; sortable: Absoluteness
Lifetime:
Shortly: When predicated of the UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLE, it denotes an abstract noun, which is more correct and l...