Fragments of Occult Truth: Difference between revisions

From Teopedia
(BCW 4 Appendix: sourced summary, full quotation and bilingual metadata)
 
(BCW volume 3: reviewed material from B. de Zirkoff’s compiler notes)
Line 3: Line 3:
|person=No
|person=No
|description=Series in ''The Theosophist'': Zirkoff attributes the first three instalments (October 1881, March and September 1882) to A. O. Hume and the later contributions signed “Lay Chela” to A. P. Sinnett; he finds no evidence for attributing them to Blavatsky or Subba Row. {{ctd-source|BCW|4|647-648}}.
|description=Series in ''The Theosophist'': Zirkoff attributes the first three instalments (October 1881, March and September 1882) to A. O. Hume and the later contributions signed “Lay Chela” to A. P. Sinnett; he finds no evidence for attributing them to Blavatsky or Subba Row. {{ctd-source|BCW|4|647-648}}.
{{ctd-source|BCW|3|322}} {{ctd-source|BCW|3|384}}
|ctd rus=Фрагменты оккультной истины
|ctd rus=Фрагменты оккультной истины
|quotes=Zirkoff, Boris
|quotes=Zirkoff, Boris
|tsw en=Fragments of Occult Truth (article)
|tsw en=Fragments of Occult Truth (article)
}}
}}

Revision as of 02:09, 17 October 2026

Terms (+) • Literature (+) • Persons (+) • Periodicals (+) • Sources
H A L P S

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Fragments of Occult Truth
Series in The Theosophist: Zirkoff attributes the first three instalments (October 1881, March and September 1882) to A. O. Hume and the later contributions signed “Lay Chela” to A. P. Sinnett; he finds no evidence for attributing them to Blavatsky or Subba Row. (BCW 4:647-648). (BCW 3:322) (BCW 3:384)


Some links:


DATA

To show: ; sortable: Fragments of Occult Truth
Lifetime:
Shortly: Series in The Theosophist: Zirkoff attributes the first three instalments (October 1881, March a...