HPB-SB-8-182: Difference between revisions

From Teopedia
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
  | notes =
  | notes =
}}
}}
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued |Buddhism and Spiritualism Vindicated;|8-181}}
{{Style P-HPB SB. Title continued |Buddhism and Spiritualism Vindicated;|8-181}}


Line 14: Line 15:
  | item = 1
  | item = 1
  | type = correspondence
  | type = correspondence
  | status = wanted
  | status = proofread
  | continues =
  | continues =
  | author = Scrutator
  | author = Scrutator
  | title = Madame Blavatsky
  | title = Madame Blavatsky
  | subtitle = Sir,- I have cut...
  | subtitle =  
  | untitled =
  | untitled =
  | source title = Spiritualist, The
  | source title = London Spiritualist,
  | source details = London, Friday, March 28, 1879
  | source details = No. 344, March 28, 1879, p. 154
  | publication date = 1879-03-28
  | publication date = 1879-03-28
  | original date =
  | original date =
Line 28: Line 29:
}}
}}


...
{{Style S-Small capitals|Sir}},—I have cut out a passage from the ''Revue Spirite ''of October, 1878, which is referred to by Madame Blavatsky in her letter to yon of March 21st, and I have appended the cutting to this page, by which you will see that Madame Blavatsky’s words, as published in the ''Revue, ''were ''“Je n’ai pas ‘passe plus de trente ans dans l’Inde,’ C’est justement mon age,—quoique fort respectable tel qu’il est,—il s’oppose violemment a cette chronologic,” ''&c., which I translated thus, “I have not ‘passed more than thirty years in India.’ It is exactly my age—although very respectable such as it is—it is in violent opposition to this chronology,” &c. In this last letter to you Madame Blavatsky tells you that the words were ''“C’est justement mon age—quoique fort respectable tel qu'il est—qui s’oppose violemment a cette chronologic,” ''&c. Madame Blavatsky adds, “I reproduce the sentence exactly as it appears, with the sole exception of restoring the period after ‘''l’Inde.' ''in place of the comma, which is simply a typographical mistake.” Madame Blavatsky will pardon me, I hope, for saying that her sentence does not appear in her letter to you as it did in the ''Revise; ''for, as you will see, in the ''Revue ''itself her words were ''“il s’oppose,” ''while in her letter to yon they are ''“qui s’oppose,” ''which substitution of the word ''qui ''for the world ''il ''makes all the difference to the translator. After this it is a little strange for Madame Blavatsky to send me to study French on account of her own error. It is also rather severe to accuse me of an error of punctuation, which I actually amended in my translation by putting a full stop after the word “India,” instead of the comma after “''l’Inde.” ''That error, whose ever it was, was not mine, as any one could easily see by referring to my letter of January 31st.
 
It pains me to be regarded as a Nemesis. I would rather be looked on as one who, like others, upholds principles in which he believes. With regard to masking my face, I only wish that circumstances would allow me to show it a little oftener than I do; and with regard to my humble name, as I have before intimated to the Editor, I do not wish it to be concealed either from Madame Blavatsky or from any other person with whom I am in conference in ''The Spiritualist.''
 
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|Scrutator}}.


{{HPB-SB-item
{{HPB-SB-item
Line 47: Line 52:


{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}
{{HPB-SB-footer-sources}}
<gallery widths=300px heights=300px>
london_spiritualist_n.344_1879-03-28.pdf|page=12|London Spiritualist, No. 344, March 28, 1879, p. 154
</gallery>

Latest revision as of 10:43, 11 August 2024

vol. 8, p. 182
from Adyar archives of the International Theosophical Society
vol. 8 (September 1878 - September 1879)

Legend

  • HPB note
  • HPB highlighted
  • HPB underlined
  • HPB crossed out
  • <Editors note>
  • <Archivist note>
  • Lost or unclear
  • Restored

<<     >>
engрус


< Buddhism and Spiritualism Vindicated; (continued from page 8-181) >

...

Madame Blavatsky

Sir,—I have cut out a passage from the Revue Spirite of October, 1878, which is referred to by Madame Blavatsky in her letter to yon of March 21st, and I have appended the cutting to this page, by which you will see that Madame Blavatsky’s words, as published in the Revue, were “Je n’ai pas ‘passe plus de trente ans dans l’Inde,’ C’est justement mon age,—quoique fort respectable tel qu’il est,—il s’oppose violemment a cette chronologic,” &c., which I translated thus, “I have not ‘passed more than thirty years in India.’ It is exactly my age—although very respectable such as it is—it is in violent opposition to this chronology,” &c. In this last letter to you Madame Blavatsky tells you that the words were “C’est justement mon age—quoique fort respectable tel qu'il est—qui s’oppose violemment a cette chronologic,” &c. Madame Blavatsky adds, “I reproduce the sentence exactly as it appears, with the sole exception of restoring the period after ‘l’Inde.' in place of the comma, which is simply a typographical mistake.” Madame Blavatsky will pardon me, I hope, for saying that her sentence does not appear in her letter to you as it did in the Revise; for, as you will see, in the Revue itself her words were “il s’oppose,” while in her letter to yon they are “qui s’oppose,” which substitution of the word qui for the world il makes all the difference to the translator. After this it is a little strange for Madame Blavatsky to send me to study French on account of her own error. It is also rather severe to accuse me of an error of punctuation, which I actually amended in my translation by putting a full stop after the word “India,” instead of the comma after “l’Inde.” That error, whose ever it was, was not mine, as any one could easily see by referring to my letter of January 31st.

It pains me to be regarded as a Nemesis. I would rather be looked on as one who, like others, upholds principles in which he believes. With regard to masking my face, I only wish that circumstances would allow me to show it a little oftener than I do; and with regard to my humble name, as I have before intimated to the Editor, I do not wish it to be concealed either from Madame Blavatsky or from any other person with whom I am in conference in The Spiritualist.

Scrutator
.


Editor's notes

  1. Madame Blavatsky by Scrutator, London Spiritualist,, No. 344, March 28, 1879, p. 154
  2. image by unknown author



Sources