Changes

2,613 bytes added ,  17:14, 24 October 2023
m
no edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:  
  | volume = 3
 
  | volume = 3
 
  | page = 143
 
  | page = 143
  | item =1
+
  | item = 1
 
  | type = article
 
  | type = article
 
  | status = wanted
 
  | status = wanted
 
  | continues =
 
  | continues =
 
  | author = Olcott, H. S.
 
  | author = Olcott, H. S.
  | title =“From the Other World”
+
  | title = “From the Other World”
 
  | subtitle =
 
  | subtitle =
 
  | untitled =
 
  | untitled =
Line 40: Line 40:  
  | volume = 3
 
  | volume = 3
 
  | page = 143
 
  | page = 143
  | item =2
+
  | item = 2
 
  | type = article
 
  | type = article
  | status = wanted
+
  | status = proofread
 
  | continues =
 
  | continues =
 
  | author =
 
  | author =
  | title =Apotheosis of Mrs. Conant
+
  | title = Apotheosis of Mrs. Conant
 
  | subtitle =
 
  | subtitle =
 
  | untitled =
 
  | untitled =
  | source title =
+
  | source title = Spiritual Scientist
  | source details =
+
  | source details = v. 2, No. 25, August 26, 1875, p. 295
  | publication date =
+
  | publication date = 1875-08-26
 
  | original date =
 
  | original date =
 
  | notes =
 
  | notes =
Line 56: Line 56:  
}}
 
}}
   −
...
+
Under this startling caption our contemporaries of the Banner of Light, publish some of the laudatory notices of the late Mrs. Conant. Good gracious! What next? Is a new religion to be instituted? Must Spiritualists be called upon to worship Mrs. Conant as a divinity? The Pope contents himself with the mere {{Style S-Small capitals|canonization}} of a devout brother or sister; he or she is made a simple {{Style S-Small capitals|saint}}; Catholics have not ventured further than this; but the Banner wants an ''apotheosis! ''It would have us make of Mrs. Conant a goddess! How would that dear, good lady have recoiled from adulation like this! An apotheosis! Does the Banner really know what it means? Let Noah Webster explain; ''“Apotheosis ''(from ''apo, ''from, and ''theos, ''god.) The act of elevating a mortal to the rank, and placing him among the number, of the gods; deification, consecration.” It is bombast like this that makes Spiritualism the laughing-stock of the cultivated classes. But the Banner’s blunder is of a piece with many of the utterances through Mrs. Conant, claiming to be scientific. What wonder that Spiritualism has been mistrusted and laughed at? Is it not time for a little wholesome competition?
      Line 62: Line 62:  
  | volume = 3
 
  | volume = 3
 
  | page = 143
 
  | page = 143
  | item =3
+
  | item = 3
  | type = article
+
  | type = proofread
 
  | status = wanted
 
  | status = wanted
 
  | continues =
 
  | continues =
  | author =J.C.R.
+
  | author = J.C.R.
 
  | title = Only One Kind of Matter in the Universe
 
  | title = Only One Kind of Matter in the Universe
 
  | subtitle =
 
  | subtitle =
 
  | untitled =
 
  | untitled =
 
  | source title = Spiritual Scientist
 
  | source title = Spiritual Scientist
  | source details =
+
  | source details = v. 4, No. 26, August 31, 1876, p. 305
  | publication date =
+
  | publication date = 1876-08-31
 
  | original date = 1876-08-16
 
  | original date = 1876-08-16
 
  | notes =
 
  | notes =
Line 78: Line 78:  
}}
 
}}
   −
...
+
''To the Editor of the Spiritual Scientist:''
 +
 
 +
There are many eminent chemists. Prof. Cooke among the number, who believe, that, instead of there being sixty-four elements, there is but one. That this one universal element assumes more than sixty different forms (according to the velocity with which the atom moves), which constitute the molecules, or their arrangement or number, it not more wonderful than the changes which some of our so-called elemental bodies suffer in their allotropic modifications — ''Scientific American.''
 +
 
 +
What a sublime simplification of the “elements” of nature the foregoing suggests! bringing us within a step of the universal atom of matter, the ''macrocosmic atom, ''save that it is pulseless and inert!
 +
 
 +
But the atom lives and moves. Whence its life and motion? Whence force? Is it not of God? Is it not “God”?
 +
 
 +
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|J.C.R.}}
 +
 
 +
{{Style P-No indent|Mt. Vernon, N.Y. Aug 16, 1876.}}
      Line 84: Line 94:  
  | volume = 3
 
  | volume = 3
 
  | page = 143
 
  | page = 143
  | item =4
+
  | item = 4
 
  | type = article
 
  | type = article
 
  | status = wanted
 
  | status = wanted
 
  | continues = 144
 
  | continues = 144
 
  | author =
 
  | author =
  | title =Our Rogues Gallery
+
  | title = Our Rogues Gallery
 
  | subtitle =
 
  | subtitle =
 
  | untitled =
 
  | untitled =
Line 106: Line 116:     
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}
 
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}
 +
 +
{{HPB-SB-footer-sources}}
 +
<gallery widths=300px heights=300px>
 +
spiritual_scientist_v.02_n.25_1875-08-26.pdf|page=7|Spiritual Scientist, v. 2, No. 25, August 26, 1875, p. 295
 +
spiritual_scientist_v.04_n.26_1876-08-31.pdf|page=5|Spiritual Scientist, v. 4, No. 26, August 31, 1876, p. 305
 +
</gallery>