HPB-SB-1-125: Difference between revisions

From Teopedia
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 91: Line 91:
  | item = 4
  | item = 4
  | type = article
  | type = article
  | status = wanted
  | status = proofread
  | continues =  
  | continues =  
  | author =  
  | author =  
Line 97: Line 97:
  | subtitle =  
  | subtitle =  
  | untitled =  
  | untitled =  
  | source title =  
  | source title = Spiritual Scientist
  | source details =  
  | source details = v. 3, No. 26, March 2, 1876, p. 303
  | publication date = 1876-03-02
  | publication date = 1876-03-02
  | original date =  
  | original date =  
Line 104: Line 104:
  | categories =  
  | categories =  
}}
}}
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|March. 2. 1776|center}}
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|March. 2. 1876|center}}


...
{{Style S-Small capitals|Says}} a correspondent of the London Spiritualist, “In my view, the use of the word ‘spirit’ to designate the spirit body is erroneous. In scriptual psychology, and in that of the Greek fathers, the spirit-body is termed the ''soul (psyche anima'', and perhaps ''nephesh''). Justin Martyr says: ’The body is the house of the soul, and the soul is the house of the spirit.’ St. Paul says: ‘I pray God your whole spirit, and soul, and body may be preserved blameless.' That ‘by virtue of the possession of which man is immortal’ should properly, I think, be termed ''spirit (pneuma, sfiritus'', and perhaps, ''ruach'') The question may be merely one of the correct, or conventional, use of terms. In the dichotomy of the Latin fathers, which, until comparatively recently, prevailed in the modern churches, the word soul seems to include both the ''pneuma'' and the ''psyche''; and the proper distinction between spirit and soul has been very generally lost sight of. We talk of seeing ‘spirits’ in the same way as we speak of so many ‘souls’ perishing at sea, or elsewhere. What the clairvoyant medium sees are spirit-bodies, or ''souls''; and what perish at sea are bodies.”


{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|<nowiki>#</nowiki> His “Spirit <u>guides</u>” have you see ordered him to {{Style S-Lost|real}} the memory of a poor, honest {{Style S-Lost|died man}} who can not defend himself!! What kind of “Spirits” must they be!}}
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|<nowiki>#</nowiki> His “Spirit <u>guides</u>” have you see ordered him to {{Style S-Lost|real}} the memory of a poor, honest {{Style S-Lost|died man}} who can not defend himself!! What kind of “Spirits” must they be!}}
Line 112: Line 112:


{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}
{{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}}
{{HPB-SB-footer-sources}}
<gallery widths=300px heights=300px>
spiritual_scientist_v.03_n.26_1876-03-02.pdf|page=3|Spiritual Scientist, v. 3, No. 26, March 2, 1876, p. 303
</gallery>

Revision as of 21:14, 16 April 2023

vol. 1, p. 125
from Adyar archives of the International Theosophical Society
vol. 1 (1874-1876)

Legend

  • HPB note
  • HPB highlighted
  • HPB underlined
  • HPB crossed out
  • <Editors note>
  • <Archivist note>
  • Lost or unclear
  • Restored

<<     >>
engрус


<Untitled> (The pusillanimity of the men)

...


<Untitled> (Another Batch of Facts)

Another Batch of Facts & Opinions from D. D. Home–Buguet, Leymarie, Eliphas Levi, etc.

...

... that trial.<*>

...

Did you have the best of them this time, O, manure, of the odoriferous “Angel World” on sweet mediumistic dung?.. I think not... Try again.

<*> Oh the dirty, mean ... !


_______
SPIRITUAL SCIENTIST
March 9, 1876.

Dr. Bloede, D.D.Home, Madame Blavatsky, and Col. Olcott

...


Soul not Spirit

March. 2. 1876

Says a correspondent of the London Spiritualist, “In my view, the use of the word ‘spirit’ to designate the spirit body is erroneous. In scriptual psychology, and in that of the Greek fathers, the spirit-body is termed the soul (psyche anima, and perhaps nephesh). Justin Martyr says: ’The body is the house of the soul, and the soul is the house of the spirit.’ St. Paul says: ‘I pray God your whole spirit, and soul, and body may be preserved blameless.' That ‘by virtue of the possession of which man is immortal’ should properly, I think, be termed spirit (pneuma, sfiritus, and perhaps, ruach) The question may be merely one of the correct, or conventional, use of terms. In the dichotomy of the Latin fathers, which, until comparatively recently, prevailed in the modern churches, the word soul seems to include both the pneuma and the psyche; and the proper distinction between spirit and soul has been very generally lost sight of. We talk of seeing ‘spirits’ in the same way as we speak of so many ‘souls’ perishing at sea, or elsewhere. What the clairvoyant medium sees are spirit-bodies, or souls; and what perish at sea are bodies.”

# His “Spirit guides” have you see ordered him to real the memory of a poor, honest died man who can not defend himself!! What kind of “Spirits” must they be!


Editor's notes

  1. The pusillanimity of the men by unknown author
  2. Another Batch of Facts by unknown author
  3. Dr. Bloede, D.D.Home, Madame Blavatsky, and Col. Olcott by unknown author, Spiritual Scientist
  4. Soul not Spirit by unknown author, Spiritual Scientist, v. 3, No. 26, March 2, 1876, p. 303



Sources