HPB-SB-4-174: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| image = SB-04-174.jpg | | image = SB-04-174.jpg | ||
| notes = | | notes = | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{HPB-SB-item | {{HPB-SB-item | ||
| volume =4 | | volume = 4 | ||
| page = 174 | | page = 174 | ||
| item =1 | | item = 1 | ||
| type = | | type = article | ||
| status = wanted | | status = wanted | ||
| author = | | continues = | ||
| title = | | author = Stevens, E. Wincherster | ||
| untitled = | | author signed = | ||
| | | title = Leadership | ||
| | | subtitle = | ||
| | | untitled = | ||
| source title = | |||
| source details = | |||
| publication date = | |||
| original date = | |||
| notes = | |||
| categories = | |||
}} | }} | ||
... | |||
{{HPB-SB-item | {{HPB-SB-item | ||
Line 28: | Line 33: | ||
| page = 174 | | page = 174 | ||
| item =2 | | item =2 | ||
| type = | | type = image | ||
| | | file = SB-04-174-2.jpg | ||
| | | image size = 150px | ||
| status = ok | |||
| author = | | author = | ||
| title = | | title = | ||
| untitled = yes | |||
| untitled =yes | | notes = | ||
| notes = | |||
| categories = | | categories = | ||
| hide = yes | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Style S-HPB SB. HPB note|An irascible Rooster – {{Style S-Lost|}} <u>thinks for himself</u>, – does he?|center}} | |||
{{HPB-SB-item | {{HPB-SB-item | ||
Line 50: | Line 52: | ||
| item =3 | | item =3 | ||
| type = article | | type = article | ||
| status = | | status = proofread | ||
| continues = | | continues = 175 | ||
| author =Blavatsky | | author =Blavatsky H.P. | ||
| title =The Author of "Isis Unveiled" Defends the Validity of her Masonic Patent | | title =The Author of "Isis Unveiled" Defends the Validity of her Masonic Patent | ||
| subtitle = | | subtitle = | ||
| untitled = | | untitled = | ||
| source title = | | source title = Franklin Register | ||
| source details = | | source details = Friday, February 8, 1878 | ||
| publication date = | | publication date = 1878-02-08 | ||
| original date = | | original date = | ||
| notes = | | notes = | ||
| archivist notes = This is pub. in "A Modern Panarion," p. 128, as H. P. Blavatsky's Masonic Patent" | |||
| categories = | | categories = | ||
}} | }} | ||
... | We are gratified to be able to present to the readers of the Register this week, the following highly-characteristic letter, prepared expressly for our Paper by Madame M. P. Blavatsky, the authoress of ''Isis Unveiled''. In this letter the lady defends the validity of her diploma as a Mason reference to which was had in our issue of January 18th. The immediate cause of the letter from Madame B. was the multiplication of attacks upon her claim to that distinguished honour both before and since the publication mentioned. | ||
The field is open for a rejoinder; and we trust that a champion will appear, to defend that which she so vigorously and bravely assails. | |||
That the subject-matter in controversy may be seen at a glance by those who may not be regular readers of our paper, we again print the text of her diploma. | |||
''To the Editor of The Franklin Register. –'' | |||
{{Style S-Small capitals|Dear Sir}}: – I am obliged to correct certain errors in your highly complimentary editorial in The Register of January 18th. You say that I have taken “the regular degrees in Masonic Lodges” and attained high dignity in the order, and further add: “Upon Madame B. has recently been conferred the diploma of the thirty-third Masonic Degree, from the oldest Masonic body in the world.” | |||
If you will kindly refer to my ''Isis Unveiled'' (Vol. II, p. 394), you will find me saying: “We are under neither promise, obligation, nor oath, and therefore violate no confidence”—reference being made to ''Western'' masonry, to the criticism of which the chapter is devoted; and full assurance is given that I have never taken “the regular degrees” in any ''Western'' masonic lodge. Of course, therefore, having taken no such degree, I am not a thirty-third degree Mason. In a private note, also in your most recent editorial, you state that you find yourself taken to task by various Masons, among them one who has taken thirty-three degrees—which include the “Ineffable”—for what you said about me. My Masonic experience—if you will so term membership in several Eastern masonic frater-{{Style S-HPB SB. Continues on |4-175}} | |||
{{ | {{HPB-SB-footer-footnotes}} |
Revision as of 16:50, 9 December 2022
Legend
Leadership
...
The Author of "Isis Unveiled" Defends the Validity of her Masonic Patent
We are gratified to be able to present to the readers of the Register this week, the following highly-characteristic letter, prepared expressly for our Paper by Madame M. P. Blavatsky, the authoress of Isis Unveiled. In this letter the lady defends the validity of her diploma as a Mason reference to which was had in our issue of January 18th. The immediate cause of the letter from Madame B. was the multiplication of attacks upon her claim to that distinguished honour both before and since the publication mentioned.
The field is open for a rejoinder; and we trust that a champion will appear, to defend that which she so vigorously and bravely assails.
That the subject-matter in controversy may be seen at a glance by those who may not be regular readers of our paper, we again print the text of her diploma.
To the Editor of The Franklin Register. –
Dear Sir: – I am obliged to correct certain errors in your highly complimentary editorial in The Register of January 18th. You say that I have taken “the regular degrees in Masonic Lodges” and attained high dignity in the order, and further add: “Upon Madame B. has recently been conferred the diploma of the thirty-third Masonic Degree, from the oldest Masonic body in the world.”
If you will kindly refer to my Isis Unveiled (Vol. II, p. 394), you will find me saying: “We are under neither promise, obligation, nor oath, and therefore violate no confidence”—reference being made to Western masonry, to the criticism of which the chapter is devoted; and full assurance is given that I have never taken “the regular degrees” in any Western masonic lodge. Of course, therefore, having taken no such degree, I am not a thirty-third degree Mason. In a private note, also in your most recent editorial, you state that you find yourself taken to task by various Masons, among them one who has taken thirty-three degrees—which include the “Ineffable”—for what you said about me. My Masonic experience—if you will so term membership in several Eastern masonic frater-<... continues on page 4-175 >
Editor's notes