Blavatsky H.P. - Strange Manifestations: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{HPB-CW-header | item title = Strange Manifestations | item author = Blavatsky H.P. | volume = 4 | pages = 27 | publications = The Theosophist, Vol. III...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
Line 8: Line 8:
  | previous    = Blavatsky H.P. - Correct Definitions and Incorrect Insinuations
  | previous    = Blavatsky H.P. - Correct Definitions and Incorrect Insinuations
  | next        = Blavatsky H.P. - Whipped into Admission
  | next        = Blavatsky H.P. - Whipped into Admission
  | alternatives = [http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v4/y1882_026.htm KH]; [https://universaltheosophy.com/hpb/strange-manifestations/ UT]
  | alternatives = [https://universaltheosophy.com/hpb/strange-manifestations/ UT]
  | translations =  
  | translations =  
}}
}}
Line 15: Line 15:


{{Style P-Title|STRANGE MANIFESTATIONS}}
{{Style P-Title|STRANGE MANIFESTATIONS}}
{{HPB-CW-comment|view=center|[''The Theosophist'', Vol. III No. 6, March, 1882, pp. 162-163]}}
{{Vertical space|}}
{{Vertical space|}}


<center>To the Editor of The Theosophist.</center>
<center>To the Editor of The Theosophist.</center>


{{Style P-No indent|MADAME,}}
{{Style P-No indent|{{Style S-Small capitals|Madame,}}}}


On the last page of No. 4 of Psychic Notes, a correspondent is made to state that he, together with a few friends, “out of mere curiosity and for the fun of the thing,” arranged a series of séances. The first was unsuccessful, but the remaining ones were productive of proofs innumerable. And yet none of the parties present was a “conjurer, mesmerist, medium or spiritualist”!
On the last page of No. 4 of ''Psychic Notes'', a correspondent is made to state that he, together with a few friends, “''out of mere curiosity and for the fun of the thing'',” arranged a series of ''séances''. The first was unsuccessful, but the remaining ones were productive of ''proofs innumerable''. And yet none of the parties present was a “conjurer, mesmerist, medium or spiritualist”!


Is this possible? I always thought that the presence of a medium at seances was a necessary condition of manifestations. Or can it be that some one at the séances in question was—if that were possible—an unconscious medium?
Is this possible? I always thought that the presence of a medium at ''seances'' was a necessary condition of manifestations. Or can it be that some one at the ''séances'' in question was—if that were possible—an ''unconscious'' medium?


Your opinion will be highly valued by
Your opinion will be highly valued by
{{Style P-Signature|Yours obediently,
{{Style P-Align right|Yours obediently,}}
H.}}
{{Style P-Signature in capitals|H.}}


The possible explanation of such manifestations can be found only in one of the following three hypotheses:
The possible explanation of such manifestations can be found only in one of the following three hypotheses: