HPB-SB-1-111

From Teopedia library
Jump to: navigation, search
vol. 1, p. 111
H.P.Blavatsky Scrapbooks
from Adyar arhives of the International Theosophical Society
vol. 1 (1874-1876)
 
Legend
There are some special styles used in text.
Move over the names to get more information
or click DT to see all design templates
  • HPB note
  • HPB underlined
  • HPB crossed out
  • <Editors note>
  • <Archivist note>
  • Lost
<<     >>
engрус



Colonel Olcott on Psychological Phenomena
<continued from page 1-110>

what he says generally is) about the cause of the lying communications given by spirits. He puts this query. “Why was this? Was it that the messages came from very inferior beings, who surrounded particular individuals?" And he truthfully adds— “circumstances such as these very much opposed the progress of Spiritualism.” No more pertinent question has been asked; no truer assertion made. It is high time that this question should be pondered by every intelligent person interested in the subject. We have gone on for nearly thirty years, receiving communications and viewing phenomena, and taking it for granted that all those which are genuine are made by disembodied human spirits. This has caused all the trouble, and made all the odium.

But the Eastern people make no such mistakes. They do not believe that all their communications are from departed friends, nor all their physical phenomena produced by them. They know better. There is not a hungry fakir or tattered sheikh who could not have taught us where to seek for the truth. They could have shown us how to produce slate writing ourselves, or any other form of physical manifestation, by controlling the currents of the “Universal Ether” by will power, and calling in the help of the elementary beings who exist in its bosom. They could have taught us what a direful calamity it is to yield to physical mediumship to the extent of perfect passivity—which is the same as saying to give oneself over as the helpless slave of the “elementaries.” Let us hope that when men of such character as Mr. Jencken formulate questions like that which I have quoted above they will be pondered over.

A few of us in this country have organised the Theosophical Society for the express purpose of looking into the science which, so far as we can discover, is alone competent to afford us this desired knowledge.

One would suppose that the inquiry was a proper one, and that, if we could prove to Spiritualists that these “very inferior beings” of Mr. Jencken’s do surround certain individuals—individuals known as physical mediums—and made them lie, and cheat, and indulge in immoral practices, we should be doing a very great service. But no sooner did I broach the idea that the “elementaries” of the Theosophists, the “Dwellers of the Threshold” of Bulwer, and these “inferior beings’’ were identical, than I was set upon and gibed at by every noisy creature who could handle a quill and gain access to the Spiritualist papers. Worse than that; I, who had been thickly besmeared with praise for my previous writings, was openly charged with conspiracy to cheat a virtuous public; and some of these dogs—for their behavior shames the human species—fell to slandering good people, and circulating all sorts of calumnies about their private characters. But I, at least, am not the man to be turned aside from the accomplishment of a lawful purpose by any such means; and now that we have begun our investigations, we mean to pursue them until we get at the truth which lies at the bottom of this filthy well. We look to the brave and true souls in Great Britain, in France, in Russia, and all over the world, for sympathy and help. We want you, above all, as representing the better portion of English Spiritualism, to feel that not one of us has the slightest sympathy with Free Love or Free Lovers, that we have no selfish ends to promote, no dogmas to inculcate; that while we have deep sympathy for the misfortunes of the unhappy people who are under the dominion of “ inferior beings,” we neither consult them as guides to philosophy nor as oracles of our departed friends. We study their cases as the physician his patient; their phenomena as the scientific observer any other manifestation of natural law. Our bread is cast upon the waters: will you send it back to us after many days?

Henry S. Olcott.

The Theosophical Society,
Mott Memorial Hall, 64, Madison-avenue, New York.

_______
SPIRITUAL SCIENTIST.
JANUARY 27.


What Col. Olcott believes.[1] <wanted>

The given value "What Col. Olcott believes.[1]" contains strip markers and therefore it cannot be parsed sufficiently.

...in the existence of [2] Cause, the source...

_______
JANUARY 15, 1876.


Col. Olcott and the "Elementaries". <wanted>


...requisite apparatus !”[3]

...


Footnotes


  1. Nota Bene. This is Col. Olcott’s personal belief and has nothing to do with belief of other Theosophists.
  2. an Eternal
  3. And Mr. Felt has done it in the presence of nine persons in all.